Public Eye
October 21, 2005 12:10 PM

Disarming Mike Wallace

By
Vaughn Ververs
Topics
CBS News Issues
There were some loose ends remaining when we last left the story of "60 Minutes" correspondent Mike Wallace and his appearance at a birthday party for columnist Art Buchwald -- a party that just so happened to also be a fundraiser for the Brady Center, a prominent advocate of gun control laws. We'll tie up those loose ends below.

First, some quick background. Wallace's appearance raised questions for CBS News from some quarters, most notably from Cam Edwards, host of the Cam and Company show on nranews.com. At issue were comments made by Wallace at the event and the fact he showed a 47-second video of a past "60 Minutes" segment that, by Wallace's own admission, cast former NRA President Charlton Heston in a less-than-favorable light.

We were asked what CBS News standards are on appearances such as these. Linda Mason, senior vice president for standards and special projects at CBS News at the time informed us that if a CBS correspondent becomes identifiable with one side of a controversial issue, that correspondent would no longer be allowed to cover that issue. When we asked if Wallace's appearance in this case made him "identifiable" on this issue, Mason said CBS was looking into the matter to determine that.

I spoke with Mason late yesterday and she told me how CBS News will deal with this issue in the future. Mason said that if Wallace "suggests a story that we feel is a potential conflict, we'll look at it and if we see a conflict, we'll turn it down." I take that to mean we won't be seeing Mr. Wallace doing any more stories involving Second Amendment issues.

When I first addressed this issue, it was with mixed feelings. I sympathized with Wallace and the explanation he provided me for his appearance. He emphasized what he saw as his humorous approach to his comments and his focus on his very good friend's 80th birthday party. But I also found the fact he had brought a video addressing the gun issue to be troubling.

I have since seen some of Wallace's remarks and am far less conflicted. In introducing the video, Wallace calls Heston the "self-righteous enemy of the Sarah and Jim Brady bunch." Coming out of the video, he mocks Heston's widely-seen comments that the government would take away his gun only from his "cold, dead hands." And he referenced, we assume, the relatively unknown position on gun control of Chief Justice John Roberts, calling him part of "the legions of the already convinced."

Wallace told me his appearance was "meant to be and was received as a joke." If so, it was one that was out of my range of humor. Others present at the event stressed to me the relative lack of discussion over gun control or the Second Amendment, saying the primary focus by far was Buchwald's birthday. I have not seen a tape of the entire event but have no reason to doubt that. Even so, Wallace did make reference to the gun debate in a way that made him identifiable with one side of this issue.

I trust Mason and CBS News to carry through with the pledge to turn down a Wallace story if there is a conflict involving his Brady Center appearance. It is the right thing to do. And I have no doubt that we'll hear about it if that does not happen.

Add a Comment
by brooklnpark June 23, 2011 5:16 PM EDT
Are you a Mike Wallace fan and would you like a picture of you added to kid car for Daytona? Upload photos of you, your family, dog, or whatever you'd like and have it added to the No. 1 Cowboys & Aliens Chevrolet Nascar! Upload here: http://******/lhWIFn
Reply to this comment
by ronmwanga October 22, 2005 6:22 PM EDT
Good job.
Reply to this comment
by twoconcepts October 22, 2005 12:35 PM EDT
OK, I\'m impressed. Compared to Mike Wallace, Judy Miller is a no-name mouse. Taking him on takes guts and deserves credit. And frankly the credit goes to CBS, not really to Public Eye and V-squared. I cans ee from the comments though the you\'ll get no credit from the right-wing blogosphere. They\'re going to pretend you don\'t exist because the need liberal bias to be a perpetual enemy. It\'s now a pillar of faith: in this evil we do believe... And, dude, here\'s the really, really bad news. The liberal are non-ideolgical blosgosphere will give you even LESS credit -- because you are a threat to their sanctimony. Now that Public Eye is getting tough with credibility on CBS, where does that leave the blogger priests. You think your pals liek Rosen or Jarvis or going to acknowledge Public v. Wallace? Dream on, now ay, ain\'t going to happen? You think Kausfiles or Schafer at Slate or Daily Kos or Romenesky will say something nice? Uh, no. But some of us who like reporting more than opining really appreciate that a real newsgathering organization would do something like this. Job well done
Reply to this comment
by ripclawe1 October 21, 2005 11:06 PM EDT
I got to admit I am shocked you are taking Mike Wallace to task like this. I had expected this site to be some sort of apologist for CBS news reports, but good work on so far proving me wrong.
Reply to this comment
by centralcal-2009 October 21, 2005 3:51 PM EDT
Vaughn: Thank you for the follow-up and candor. This is exactly what the public wants to see from journalists -- honesty and fairness. That in turn makes the journalist respected and trusted.
Reply to this comment
by mailpro56 October 21, 2005 3:33 PM EDT
What I meant in my last post..is what do you guys do all day? You have three Public Eye staffers...how many other people are supporting and investigating for this site? Maybe you can let us know what a typical day is for you and your staff...I would love to know. In the world of blogs..this site is kind of stagnat.
Reply to this comment
by mailpro56 October 21, 2005 3:22 PM EDT
Thanks Vaughn..that only took 8 days to clear up.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Public Eye

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook
  • Building You a Better Morning

  • CBS This Morning

    "CBS This Morning," anchored by Charlie Rose, Gayle King and Erica Hill, airs weekdays from 7 to 9 a.m. ET and at the same time in other time zones.
    Learn more...