Across The Media Universe: The Result Are In Edition

By: Matthew Felling
Topics: Across The Media Universe

(Getty Images/David Hume Kennerly)

Bahgdad Diarist Legit: As reported in this space last week, a rapid-fire media controversy was brewing in blogistan over The New Republic's "Baghdad Diarist." A lot of people disputed the claims of the writer, which included playing with a skull and the mockery of a disfigured woman by soldiers. Well, the New Republic went into immediate damage control mode and investigated the complaints, with the Washington Post reporting their final verdict:

The New Republic said yesterday that it has corroborated each of the allegations in an essay written by an American soldier in Iraq by checking with other members of the man's unit.

With the exception of one "significant discrepancy," for which the magazine expressed regret, the New Republic is standing behind the account of Scott Thomas Beauchamp, an Army private whose reports of petty cruelty were aggressively challenged by conservative bloggers.

Reporting from the other side of the planet in a war zone is difficult enough. Trying to do so anonymously leaves a publication vulnerable to such charges.

L.A. Mayor's Girlfriend Suspended:Remember a while back when a Telemundo reporter was found to have been involved with the mayor of Los Angeles while he was still married? (The picture above shows her at work, interviewing Hizzoner.) Telemundo has conducted an internal investigation and meted out their version of justice, according to the AP:

A Los Angeles television anchor who reported on the mayor's marital problems without telling viewers she was "the other woman" has been suspended by her Spanish-language network.

However, Mirthala Salinas has only been suspended for two months without pay, and not fired, reports KCBS-TV.

Two months seems about par for the course, but who knows how much more she would've gotten if she'd been videotaped at the mayor's pool in a two-piece?

National Journal Votes "No" On Citizen Journalism: Even though the YouTube debate and this week's flood of CNN iReports has garnered a lot of attention on the populist possibilities of new media, National Journal media writer William Powers isn't so hot on it. He sarcastically writes:

Here's how it works: Next time you see news happening -- say, a jumbo jetliner crashes in your neighborhood, or you overhear a presidential candidate plotting dirty campaign tricks -- race to your keyboard and tap out a story. Throw in an image snapped with your mobile phone, upload it all to the Net, and -- voila! -- you're a journalist. Who needs the pros?

I've gotta agree with Powers on this one, but not in the 'media elite' sense. Just because you happen to be near something newsworthy, that doesn't make you a journalist. When I was a kid, we used to call those people 'witnesses.'

2 Comments Have Your Say
Email Story Send to a Friend
Share This Tell Your Friends
Tweet This Tweet This
More Share It

Add a Comment


by meander11 August 5, 2007 10:12 PM EDT: My goodness, what an amazing white washing of how things stand with the controvery over The New Republic's anonymos soldier correspondent. You are only sharing The New Republic's version and not even going into detail on the admitted "significant discrepency". It was that the soldier reporter originally claimed that his disgusting mocking of a disfigured female had happened in Iraq and was an example of how involvement in war distoys a person's decency. The New Republic originally said it had collaboration of the incident and stood behind the story. However, after it became apparent that the heinous mockery never took place in Iraq, the soldier reporter changed the locale for the heinous mocking to Kuwait where he was stationed before he ever got involved in battles in Iraq. So, his whole point about involvement in war coarsening regular sensibilities is a bunch of nonsense. You owed to your readers to be more forthcoming about the whole story. you are as deceptive as The New Republic. Shame!; Reply to this comment


by memekiller August 3, 2007 8:40 PM EDT: Thanks for following up on the Bagdhad diarist. Something most outlets never do when a story evaporates, though they should. I have yet to understand exactly why a pro-war publication would create a fake journalist to undermine the war effort, but hey, it beats admitting you screwed up.; Reply to this comment