Where's Clark Kent?

By: Matthew Felling
Topics: In The News

(AP)

"Nobody phones the paper expecting to find a hero anymore," according to the current New York Review of Books essay "Goodbye to Newspapers."

And yesterday's Harris Poll seconds that notion, as Editor and Publisher points out:

Hang down your head, journalist -- your fellow Americans don't think your career is much to be proud of.

The annual Harris Poll measuring public perceptions of 23 professions and occupations came out Wednesday -- and you can find journalists in the Bottom Ten.

It's conventional wisdom, of course, that journalism has truly taken a beating in terms of esteem and prestige in recent years. Journalists take a back seat to used car salesmen and ambulance-chasing lawyers nowadays, prompting a sigh from the ink-stained crowd as they order another brew and talk about the Good Ol' Days.

According to the data, only 13 percent of 2007 respondents consider journalists possessing "very great prestige." That's not surprising, given the stormy climate of MediaLand. Conventional wisdom has it that that the media has tanked, having endured several self-inflicted wounds in the past 5 or 10 years. But you'd think that back in the 1970s – after Watergate, the ultimate watchdog success story – reporting would be way way higher than that, right?

Not so much.

Back in 1977, the number of respondents who held journalists in high regard was … wait for it … 17 percent. So after decades of scandals and tarnished Pulitzers and name-calling and tabloid fixations, journalists have fallen a less-than-overwhelming 4 percent in the public's eyes.

The Harris Poll doesn't seem to go farther back than that – and calls for comment were not returned – but I suspect there was a time when journalists were seen better.

For example: What did Superman do in his spare time? He was a mild mannered reporter for the Daily Planet. We all know this. People used to see journalists more as watchdogs and social do-gooders, so it wasn't anywhere near a stretch to have America's greatest superhero working a news beat.

I've got three observations about the historical trend:

Journalists aren't the sorts to seek and cultivate public approval ratings, as their job is to find News. And News is, as the old phrase goes, "Something that someone, somewhere wants hidden." You don't make friends by rattling cages.
And …

Americans are a jaded and cynical bunch. All of the "prestige" ratings – but for two – have gone down in the past 30 years. We just don't think very highly of anything or anybody these days, it seems.
But …

The one silver lining in the study? The one profession that has seen the best increase in public perception? Teaching. By 25 percent. That's great news, period.

The Harris Poll results may look like news, but they're not. With journalism having devolved into one big battle royale of egos and brands and blowhards trying to outdo one another and belittle the competition – along with alternative media and bloggers blowing spitballs at mainstream reporters – that 13 percent mark may end up being the highest prestige rating we see for awhile. Part of that is the public mood, for sure. But let's face it: Journalism isn't a popularity contest; if it is, you're doing it wrong.

4 Comments Have Your Say
Email Story Send to a Friend
Share This Tell Your Friends
Tweet This Tweet This
More Share It

Add a Comment


by joycewest August 3, 2007 1:50 PM EDT: Yes, the hordes of journalists at big news events can leave the rest of us somewhat taken aback. However, the only reason there are hordes is because there is so much competition in journalism, generally considered a healthy thing in a free-market economy, but often a disturbing spectacle otherwise. What is the alternative to the horde? One lone reporter, two or three? Which ones get to have access? No one could agree on that. So then you see reporters making note of the numbers of reporters on the scene, in a sheepish acknowledgment that the descent of a swarm of reporters is news in itself.
There's always been a type of journalism despised for its intrusiveness, its callousness, its pandering to shallow celebrity. That probably hasn't changed in a hundred years. More recent is the resentment of big media, the swarm it creates, its access to those in power, its access to a public platform.
Things are changing, though. Now almost everyone has access to a public platform through the Internet. However, people still don't have access to those in power. When that changes, attitudes might change.; Reply to this comment


by brucesmall August 3, 2007 4:29 AM EDT: Journalism might do better if it could curb the apparently irresistible urge to stampede in a large herd to a site where there might be news, maybe. If a plane crashes there will be a horde of journalists at the airport interviewing relatives and asking how they feel. If there is a rumor somebody famous might say something there will be an equal horde of journalists camped out in the street and on lawns so they can yell a question, which will be ignored.; Reply to this comment


by memekiller August 2, 2007 9:56 PM EDT: The only people happy with "journalism" are the ones who watch FOX News because it toes the party line. Places like CNN are like the Joe Klein of news: Republican in practice, liberal by default, and pleasing no one being all things to all people.

You help FOX when you run BS to prove your loyalty to the cultist viewers, and you reinforce FOX's claims you aren't loyal if you ever, ever run anything that isn't FOX disingenuous. The cultists will always hate you, and everyone else loses respect when you're cowed.

You want credibility? Don't be liberal. Stop being 50% FOX and be 100% journalism.; Reply to this comment


by jimcyr-2009 August 2, 2007 5:39 PM EDT: You just can not deal with the truth:
Most people LOATHE the media today because of its DISHONESY. Sure, it's one thing for the media to be constanly trying to shove its liberal ideology down America's throats a million times a day (in ways subtle and not-so-subtle). But what really GALLS people is that the media always LIES about trying to do that! It just flat out lies about it. "We're not trying to do that!! You're crazy!"
THAT is why so many people can't stand the Old Media anymore.; Reply to this comment