Public Eye
By

Brian Montopoli /

CNET/ April 3, 2007, 3:09 PM

Group Criticizes "60 Minutes" Report On Drug Lobby

Sunday's "60 Minutes" report on the Medicare prescription drug bill and the lobbying and politics associated with it, which you can watch by clicking on the video box, has come in for criticism from a conservative group called The National Center For Public Policy Research.

In a press release, the Center criticizes "60 Minutes" for relying on a report (PDF) from the group Families USA. It claims the report falsely exaggerated Medicare drug prices because its data come from two relatively affluent counties.

"60 Minutes" producer Ira Rosen, who produced the segment, told me he stands by the story, saying that "Families USA data is represented nationally." I also spoke to Families USA Executive Director Ron Pollack. Pollack told me that "the major plans that are providing prescription drug coverage are national plans. And the price data are similar from one area to another. If we literally did every county, we'd never get a report out. So what we've done is taken areas that we thought are representative – and checked to make sure that was true."

"Whenever we issue information like this, we know very well that this is going to be examined carefully," he added. "The drug lobby – PhRMA – has not criticized our data at all." PhRMA has criticized Family USA's decision to use the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as a point of comparison, however, arguing that the VA system is fill of deficiencies. "60 Minutes" made the same comparison.

The Center also complained that "60 Minutes" identified Families USA as a non-partisan group, calling it "a left-wing organization with an agenda of increasing government involvement in health care."

"We are non-partisan – I want to be clear about that," said Pollack. "We have never supported or opposed any political candidate for any office, ever. I don't know how I could be more resolute about this. And indeed, our tax exempt status requires us to be." Pollack said that the vast majority of the group's finding comes from non-partisan foundations, though it has received a "tiny proportion of funding" from George Soros.
© 2007 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
6 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marie242 says:
According to the Borgen Project, in reality only .16% of our federal budget is spent on poverty reduction, the least among wealthy nations compared to the 50% we spend on defense. We should let our representatives know that we care about global poverty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baldozz says:
I followed the debate on the prescription drug bill and everything that 60 minutes reported on it is true.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cinemanetwork20 says:
Its not surprising that the party of moral values seems to always involved in deals that DO NOT BENIFIT THE AVERAGE MAN , but a few individuals in big buisness, or a few republicians. No bid contracts in Iraq, No bid contracts in New Orleans, and now Big Drug Companies and a handful of congressmen who just happen to get high paying jobs with said companies. And just what is BUsh getting?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mattcat25 says:
I%u2019m glad the GOP Congress forced all of us to be overcharged for needed prescription drugs, and I%u2019m sure all you right wing nuts are happy your elderly parents are confronted with the choice of either to pay for their medication, or eat.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
geno8808 says:
This just another example in a long history of gross malfeasance by the producers of 60 minutes. I never watch the show and don't know anyone who does.

Someone needs to clean house at CBS News. Only fools would believe a story put out by these hacks. Advertisers must not pay very much to reach the veiwers of this nonsense.

I call on the Management at CBS Corporation to issue an apology for this story and run a retraction. Then I call for the discharge all CBS News employees, and the cancellation of all the CBS News shows, the death penalty as it were. In a year or so when you have reconstituted the divsion you set to work righting all the wrongs you committed.

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bricko says:
Interesting, you called Families USA a "non-partisan health care watchdog group," but called the National Center for Public Policy Research "a conservative group called The National Center For Public Policy Research." The National Center is conservative, but it has the same tax status as Families USA -- and has an equal claim to be called "non-partisan" by CBS.

Families USA is a Left wing group pushing more government in Health care , makes not one whit of difference that they dont push a candidate. The things they push are far more dangerous than candidates, its their ideas that are dangerous.

But we are lucky in that the media is mostly functionally illiterate when it comes to statistics. They really need to hire some folks from outside the Columbia School of Journalism, and get some scientifically literate types and then teach them how to write a cogent sentence...might be easier and garner them more credibility.
reply