February 16, 2007 9:57 AM
- Text
Failing To Fast Forward

(AP)
This news has serious implications for broadcasters, who have long feared a DVR-enabled populace that skips commercials. (Those fears are part of the reason that advertising has increasingly been integrated into the programming itself – those Coke glasses don't show up on "American Idol" by accident.) The new data means that broadcasters could start charging advertisers for commercials viewed by DVR-users, something they have not been able to do thus far. It might also keep broadcasters from abandoning the traditional advertising model, an outcome some have said was inevitable once DVRs reached critical mass.
There are reasons to be skeptical about this study, however. The first is simple common sense: Why would people with the option of skipping commercials not bother to do so? I understand that many people tune into shows at the time they air, but that seems like learned behavior that will fade as DVR use grows. In addition, the Neilson Company is not exactly an unbiased player in all this, since their revenue is tied to their ability to measure television audiences. If broadcasters fundamentally alter their business model because ads are going unwatched, the company could be left out in the cold.
-
Brian Montopoli Brian Montopoli is the senior political reporter at CBSNews.com.
Follow on Twitter »
1 Comments +
Popular Now in CBSNews.com
- ISP: Online Sex Show
- Best. Journalism Quotes. Ever.
- The Story Behind The Story: Charles Robert Jenkins on "60 Minutes"
- ISP: Nudes on Ice
- What's Newsworthy
- Is The Media Hyping Global Warming?
- ISP: Russian Sex Bomb
- Media: An Early Warning System Or Hype Machine?
- E-Mailbag: Taking Aim At Mike Wallace And Guns
- The Buks Stops Here
- Known Knowns, Known Unknowns And Unknown Unknowns: A Retrospective
- What's New At School (1972)
- Public Eye: Abortion In 1965
- ISP: Sex Holiday
- ISP: Oral (Sex) History
- Edward R. Murrow On Air





