Public Eye
February 14, 2006 1:12 PM

A Notebook Moment

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Mega-Media Trends
Finally, proof that Dick Cheney and Howard Dean aren't so different after all.

You remember the Dean scream, right? After a disappointing third place showing in the Iowa caucuses in January 2004, Howard Dean's speech before his supporters included a yelp – well, a yeeeeeeeearrrrrrhhhhh, really – that the press corps and late night comics seized on as evidence that Dean is an angry hothead, a presidential candidate "with the personality of a hockey dad," in the words of David Letterman. It didn't matter that the ill advised yelp, which really wasn't all that bad in the first place, was hardly evidence of presidential competence, or lack thereof. The scream helped kill Dean's candidacy because it gave reporters and commentators a chance to unload all of their suspicions about the surprise frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, suspicions they hadn't been able to tie to a story previously. It allowed them to empty out their notebooks – to tie a campaign's worth of misgivings about the candidate to one seminal moment.

Dick Cheney, six years into his vice presidential tenure, is now experiencing much the same phenomenon. The Cheney shooting would have been big news no matter what, of course: In case you're forgotten, the vice president of the United States shot a 78-year-old man in the face. But the coverage of what seems to have been, ultimately, a pretty routine hunting accident has been nothing less than overwhelming. Front page play in the Washington Post and New York Times yesterday, along with multiple stories in each today; top story treatment on last night's CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News; and prominent play on the cable news networks and news Web sites.

The poor handling of the event by the White House didn't help matters. In a comment he jokingly admitted was in "terrible taste," Howard Kurtz pointed out that "the White House shot itself in the foot" by not immediately releasing the news and offering up its own spin. (It opted instead to leave the task to a private citizen.) "Seriously," Kurtz wrote, "[w]hat were they thinking?...the administration essentially thumbed its nose at the national press."

But while the news was handled badly, not informing the national press about the shooting for nearly a day was, while irresponsible, a fairly minor transgression in the grand scheme of things. This was not, after all, a case of misrepresenting intelligence or denying sexual relations with "that woman." It was neglecting to take the proper public relations strategy in the immediate wake of a hunting accident. Nonetheless, yesterday's heated press briefing had the makings of a public flogging, though the victim was a mere proxy. "[White House Press Secretary Scott] McClellan was left twisting in the wind," says CBS News White House correspondent Bill Plante. "He was in the unfortunate position of being hung out to dry by the vice president."

But Cheney isn't going to get off easy either. For one thing, outrage, as McClellan intimated yesterday in an insulting exchange with NBC's David Gregory, is in season for reporters these days. But more importantly, the press corps now has its notebook moment – its chance to tie all of its distrust of and bitterness towards the vice president to a seminal moment, just as it did with the Dean scream. That's why the delay in sharing the story with the press is a significant blow to Cheney. Had this been a mere hunting accident, it surely still would have made great fodder for late night comedians, and it would have fed, albeit rather obliquely, into the notion that the vice president, with his neoconservative credentials, is the kind of guy who shoots before he's quite sure of the target. But withholding the information took the transgression to a much more damaging level, because it gave reporters a chance to say what they've been thinking for years: That Cheney simply isn't willing to level with the American people.

"[Cheney] clearly doesn't like doing things under the full scrutiny of the media," says Plante. "No other vice president in the White Houses I've covered has had the ability to write his own rules the way this one has. He operates in his own sphere, with the apparent acceptance of the president. That creates a certain frustration for the press."

And that frustration is now manifesting itself in the flurry of stories about the shooting and the lag in letting the press corps know about it. Cheney might be in for a hard year: Last week, his former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, told a grand jury that his "superiors" instructed him to leak classified information to the press. (Dean is suggesting Cheney should resign if he's the superior who did so.) The press corps' attitude towards the vice president is sure to impact Cheney's ability to keep any coming controversies under control. By giving reporters their notebook moment, he's handed them more leeway in pushing the story of his possible malfeasance to the public. The shooting and its aftermath may not come back to haunt Cheney, but even a politician as disdainful of the press as he is must know it's important not to give reporters an opening. If he doesn't, he might want to sit down with Howard Dean.

Add a Comment
by djman1142 February 17, 2006 1:23 AM EST
As Jeff Rosen noted in a recent blog, the WH Press Corps has become irrelevant and clowns like Gregory demonstrate what a joke the mainstream media is regarded NOT ONLY BY THE WHITE HOUSE. Cheney gave the WHPress the respect they deserve, which is none. He dissed them and had to pay a small price while they made fools of themselves on a daily basis. Not that these clueless cocoon-dwellers have a clue as to how silly a bunch of spoiled childish brats they appear to be. I guess the entitled legacy exempt media are as contemptible as they believe Bush & Cheney are. I don't blame Cheney for raising his disdain to the level of their contempt for him and the Bush Administration. By the way, the last time I saw Bill Plante he was publicly drunk in a Georgetown tavern. Hope he's on the wagon.
Reply to this comment
by islyeofskye February 15, 2006 12:52 PM EST
How much was the delay in reporting the event effect by the alcohol consumption of the hunters. Was Cheney drinking and shooting? Do we just take his word? It seems to me 24 hours and a lot of coffee covers him.
Reply to this comment
by starjonburch February 15, 2006 11:51 AM EST
i dont think he should be excused of what he did he shot another man and there is no justice being done why is that because he works in the white house, if that was someone else they would be trying to press charges and he doesnt have any what is really the deal in the white house i think there should be some type of consequences.
Reply to this comment
by mikezwolf February 14, 2006 6:03 PM EST
As usual, our cowardly and intimidated media, ever-fearful of being called 'liberal', provides fake 'balance' by perpetuating Republican smears against the DNC Chairman. The 'balance' goes like this: If there's a bad story for Democrats, you just report it straight, along with Republican 'response' to it. If there's a bad story for Republicans, you rush to simultaneously bring up some ancient story against Democrats, or to just make it up (see Abramoff). Anyone who was in the audience (or who bothers to, you know, check the facts) knows there was no 'scream'. Dean's 'yeah' was drowned in the noise from the crowd and was barely audible. The TV clip was a mendacious manipulation of what actually happened, thanks to some clever sound-work boosting up the volume from a directional microphone to isolate and ampliphy Dean's voice. Isn't it your job to know what is true and what is not? Even if for the sake of your fake 'balance' you decide to bring up the comparison to the fracas that followed Dean's speach, it's your obligation (especially given that Dean is now DNC Chairman) to note that that fracas was based on a non-existent event. Cheney's shooting of a man in the face and chest, on the other hand, is all too real.
Reply to this comment
by peterbaldwin-2009 February 14, 2006 5:18 PM EST
The White House can't stop lying. It doesn't appear that Mr. Whittington had a "minor heart attack", or myocardial infarction, at all. It just sounds better to say that because a heart attack might not be directly linked to the actual shooting. What he apparently has is something entirely different: an arrhythmia, which is a condition directly attributable to heart damage caused solely by being shot in the heart and nothing else.
Reply to this comment
by ronmwanga February 14, 2006 5:08 PM EST
Excellent summation (esp. drawing the parallels w?the Dean Scream). *&%? Cheney had a terrible week, going now into it's second installent. The Libby quote from the National Journal, and also the Robert Novak quote that the Vice President saw "no upside" to revealing everything on NSA wiretaps to the Senate. Now: this. I'll only add that there is history between the Press corps and McClellan, and it probably wasn't the best idea to let him end up as point-man.
Reply to this comment
by peterbaldwin-2009 February 14, 2006 4:51 PM EST
I apologize for the posting below. What has been dismissed as "being peppered", a superficial injury, is not what happened. Being shot in the heart is no laughing matter.
Reply to this comment
by peterbaldwin-2009 February 14, 2006 4:39 PM EST
Scot McClellan, White House press secretary who is not allowed to speak truthfully to the media, reports that the night before at the ranch there was a big pre-Mardi Gras masquerade party; everyone was dressed up, and Chaney (dressed up as a Republican Robin Hood who steals from poor children to give to the superrich) was three sheets to the wind. Waddington was dressed up in a silly Sesame Street Big Bird outfit, and Chaney was staring at him all night. The rest is history.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Public Eye

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook