CBS/AP/ March 19, 2013, 11:55 AM

Neiman Marcus "faux fur" not so fake after all

WASHINGTON The Federal Trade Commission says that a trio of retailers, including Neiman Marcus, have agreed to settle charges that they falsely claimed certain products were made of "faux'' fur, when they actually contained real fur.

In addition to the upscale department store operator, the retailers include DrJays.com Inc. and Eminent Inc., doing business as Revolve Clothing.

The FTC says the companies also violated federal laws by not naming the animal that the fur came from.

The FTC also charged that The Neiman Marcus Group Inc. falsely claimed that a rabbit fur product had mink fur, and failed to disclose the fur country of origin for three fur products.

Under the proposed settlement, the retailers would be prohibited from violating the laws for 20 years.

According to the FTC, Neiman Marcus's website misrepresented the fur content and failed to disclose the animal name and fur country of origin for three products: a Burberry Outerwear Jacket, a Stuart Weitzman Ballerina Flat shoe, and an Alice + Olivia Kyah Coat. Neiman Marcus also misrepresented the fur content of the shoe in its catalog, at bergdorfgoodman.com, and in ads mailed to consumers.

DrJays.com allegedly misrepresented the fur content and failed to disclose the animal name for three products: a Snorkel Jacket by Crown Holder with a fur-lined hood, a Fur/Leather Vest by Knoles & Carter with exterior fur, and a New York Subway Leather Bomber Jacket by United Face with fur lining.

Eminent Inc., doing business as Revolve Clothing, allegedly misrepresented the fur content and failed to disclose the animal name for four products: an Australia Luxe Collective Nordic Angel Short Boot with a fur-trimmed hood, a Mark Jacobs Runway Roebling Coat, a Dakota Xan Fur Poncho, and an Eryn Brinie Belted Faux Fur Vest.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
3 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KPeters_from_UK says:
I do own a gorgeous fur trimmed coat which I love but if I were to buy a coat that was falsely labeled as faux and it turn out not to be that's a huge problem.

For me the idea of making my own choices is paramount and when someone else starts screwing with my prerogative I get pi$$ed off.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
vissionquest says:
Sure does put a real scare into cheaters, when the punishment forbids them from cheating again --- this has got to be a joke.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tychicum says:
"Under the proposed settlement, the retailers would be prohibited from violating the laws for 20 years."

That is the nuttiest statement I have read in quite some time ...
reply