By

Jill Schlesinger /

MoneyWatch/ February 22, 2013, 9:10 AM

The sequester: A Q&A

(MoneyWatch) The package of mandated federal spending cuts known as the "sequester" is only days away. Here's a primer on what that means and how it might affect you.

What is "sequestration"? By definition, sequestration is "a legal writ authorizing a sheriff or commissioner to take into custody the property of a defendant who is in contempt until the orders of a court are complied with." The word is derived from British law and amounts to the act of taking someone's property until a debt has been paid.

In the U.S., budget laws allow the executive branch to "undo" congressional appropriations with small, across-the-board spending cuts. In its current use, sequestration amounts to $1.2 trillion in across-the-board government spending cuts scheduled to occur over the next decade.

How did the spending cuts come about? In August 2011, lawmakers fought over raising the debt ceiling, which is the government's borrowing limit. Republicans would not agree to increase the debt ceiling unless there was a plan to immediately reduce the nation's debt.

To end the impasse, Congress and President Barack Obama agreed to the Budget Control Act (BCA), which allowed for an additional $2.4 trillion in borrowing in exchange for a similar amount of deficit reduction over the next decade. Of that amount, $900 billion was to be achieved through spending caps affecting all government functions outside of entitlement programs.

The balance of the cuts would be determined by the Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction, a bipartisan committee charged with finding a way to slash the nation's government spending by $1.2 trillion over the next ten years.

This so-called supecommittee had a big incentive to come up with a plan: If they could not come to an agreement, there would be a trigger: sequestration, or automatic $1.2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade coming equally from domestic and defense spending.

According to the Office of Management and Budget, "bipartisan majorities in both the House and Senate voted for the threat of sequestration as a mechanism to force Congress to act on further deficit reduction. The specter of harmful across-the-board cuts to defense and non-defense programs was intended to drive both sides to compromise. The sequestration itself was never intended to be implemented."

That threat didn't work. Because the supercommittee failed to reach an agreement, the automatic spending cuts were set to go into effect on Jan. 2, 2013. However, as part of the "fiscal cliff" negotiations, sequestration was delayed until March 1. There was hope that the cuts would be replaced by a more nuanced plan, but such a plan has yet to materialize.

How much will be cut in 2013? The sequester would cut government spending by an average of $109 billion over the next 10 years. But the last-minute fiscal cliff deal included cuts of $24 billion for 2013, so in the remaining seven months of this fiscal year the government must come up with $85 billion in cuts.

Where will the spending cuts occur? The cuts will occur in the Defense Department, which will see 13 percent cuts (uniformed military personnel would be exempt), and in "discretionary" programs (those that don't have earmarked funds), which will see cuts of roughly 9 percent. Under the rules of sequestration, cuts must be applied to all programs, without regard to whether a particular service is seen as essential.

In addition to government contractors and grant recipients, who will likely see cuts, here are are some examples of government employees who will be subject to a furlough and/or layoffs:

-- Most of the Pentagon's civilian personnel (800,000 employees) will give up one day a week for more than five months

-- Airport security screeners, customs agents and air traffic controllers would face a day of furlough every two weeks

-- FBI employees, including special agents

-- U.S. Agriculture Department food safety inspectors

-- Homeland Security border agents

-- Social Security temporary workers

Will Medicare be cut? Yes, the government-run health care program for seniors would face a 2 percent cut in Medicare payments to providers and insurance plans, which amounts to a reduction of $11 billion next year.

What programs won't be cut? Social Security, Medicaid, supplemental security income, refundable tax credits, the children's health insurance program, the food stamp program and veterans' benefits. Active-duty military personnel would be exempt from the cuts.

How will sequestration affect the economy? The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the cuts could reduce public- and private-sector employment by 750,000 jobs in 2013 and reduce GDP by 0.5 percent.

Where do the parties stand? While both Republicans and Democrats agree that sequestration is a bad way to run the nation's finances, for now there seems to little appetite for a new round of deal making before the March 1 deadline.

Republicans insist that a deal not raise taxes, even if such increases are offset by closing tax loopholes. GOP leaders would replace cuts in defense with other cuts to mandatory programs, like food stamps, children's health insurance and Medicaid.

Mr. Obama and the Democrats favor reducing the federal deficit with half the reduction coming from revenue increases and half from spending cuts. The president also has expressed support for reforming the personal and corporate tax code, mostly by eliminating deductions and tax credits claimed by the wealthiest Americans.

What's the next key deadline after sequestration takes effect? On paper, the government runs out of money March 27, although it has ways to continue funding itself beyond that date.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
  • Jill Schlesinger On Twitter » On Google+ »

    View all articles by Jill Schlesinger on CBS MoneyWatch »
    Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is a business analyst for CBS News. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Previously, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.

36 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhonmillire says:
Reverse mortgages are designed as financial assistance for people 62 years or older. The reverse mortgage works by allowing the homeowner access to the equity in their home without the issues of a monthly payment for the available funds.

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgages-pros-and-cons/
http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-calculator/
http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/hecm-reverse-mortgage/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uid_zero says:
Okay the cuts are on new spending. Isn't this like 1/16 of 1% of the budget?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
derukugi08 says:
I really enjoy reading your columns. Your factual no-political-spin method of writing about issues is refreshing. Thank you!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
StuntMattster says:
FIRE THEM ALL! I agree DANBUZZMAN. The current politians have very little fear of the American people. The decisions they make are not is what in the best interest for America but what is in their best interest to stay in office. Let's put the fear back into thier minds by cleaning house. Then the next set of pols will do what needs to get done to make America stronger.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jschaufele says:
As the Area Agency on Aging in the metropolitan area, the Denver Regional Council of Governments passes federal (and state) funds through to service providers to pay for services like Meals on Wheels and rides to and from medical appointments, shopping and more to help older adults live independently in their homes.

The sequester, however, will cut funds for meals and transportation for the next nine years. In our best estimate, ~25 percent of the older adults we serve will be forced into assisted living facilities and nursing homes because of their dependence on home-delivered meals and transportation. In most instances, these individuals will almost immediately start accessing Medicare and Medicaid. In doing so, the taxpayer subsidy in our region increases from an average of $350 per month to a whopping $4,200! Please also note Medicare and Medicaid are two of the fastest-growing segments of both the federal and state budgets.

I hear frequently how government ought to behave more like business. When businesses tighten their belts however, they don't take an ax to their budget. They cut strategically and if there's ever been a time where this approach is called for in Washington, it's now.

Please, contact your Congressional members and urge them to support a thoughtful, reasoned approach to reducing the nation's debt and maintaining programs that keep taxpayer costs down.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cas1849 says:
""What is "sequestration"? By definition, sequestration is "a legal writ authorizing a sheriff or commissioner to take into custody the property of a defendant who is in contempt until the orders of a court are complied with." The word is derived from British law and amounts to the act of taking someone's property until a debt has been paid.""

SO.........when is China going to take "property" until our debt to them has been paid off. What is being used as collateral?? Maybe the Dave Ramsey approach is needed?? Would be a shame for us, our children and grandchildren to lose United States of America to China for a debt owed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stevehamilton858 says:
The GOP is going to end up with more egg on its face over its poor handling of replacing sequestration cuts with cuts based on some analysis of intelligent options. There does not appear to be anyone in charge - like a CEO - of the party. Priebus is having a good day when his socks match. He has neither the leadership or managerial capabilities to run an organization with as many problems as the GOP has. Right now, the GOP reminds me of General Motors, just before it went bankrupt. The executives who are supposed to be running the organization are clueless.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
anebt says:
There are no spending cuts. There is only a cut in the never-ending increase of spending. It is a pittance. Much ado about nothing. Thee will be no apocalypse.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Trapperpk says:
The incompetence of leadership, the neglect for responsibility in governance is measured during a sequester. It is like an arm twisting transaction to make politicos whole again. However, the people will pay as the smug, smart, and cynical, applies new ways to extract citizens life blood of income away. So those in power can continue to play golf and not take blame. The "let them eat cake" era has arrived in the US 210 years later.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
melbatom says:
YOU CAN BET THIS IS A CUT SO BOTH PARTYS CAN AVOID THE BLAME. What a political game is being played with the citizens of the USA. Most have no concept what is going on. When you lose your pay check, saving account, home, property or what ever remember what has happened--you have beed suckered!
reply
See all 36 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right