Court backs $319M verdict vs. Disney over "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire"
LOS ANGELES A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $319 million verdict over profits from the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" and rejected Walt Disney Co.'s request for a new trial.
A jury decided in 2010 that Disney hid the show's profits from its creators, London-based Celador International. The ruling Monday by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found no issues with the verdict or with a judge's rulings in the case.
"I am pleased that justice has been done," Celador Chairman Paul Smith said in a statement.
Disney did not immediately comment on the decision.
The ruling comes more than two years after the jury ruled in Celador's favor after a lengthy trial that featured testimony from several top Disney executives. The company sued in 2004, claiming Disney was using creative accounting to hide profits from the show, which first ran in the United States from August 1999 to May 2002 and was a huge hit for ABC.
The jury found that Celador was owed $269.2 million, and a judge later added $50 million in interest to the judgment.
The appeals court determined the verdict was not "grossly excessive or monstrous" and that it was not based on speculation or guesswork.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- How to stop the mediocrity pandemic
- What homeowners should do before - and after - a tornado
- Top five 529 college plans
- LinkedIn: 3 tips for building a better profile
- Apple's Cook says company doesn't use "tax gimmicks"
- How to organize your job hunt
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
Sorry, Ganguandaland, there is no sarcasm in the original comment. You may recognize something in the remark other than sincerity, but it is not sarcasm. What's our educational system coming to?