By

CBSNews /

CBS/ AP/ April 17, 2009, 3:59 PM

GM, Chrysler Boost Aid Requests

General Motors and Chrysler asked the government for an additional $14 billion in aid, a dramatic acknowledgment that conditions in the U.S. auto industry have grown significantly worse in just two months.

GM presented a survival plan that also calls for cutting a total of 47,000 jobs globally and closing five more U.S. factories. That represents the largest work force reduction announced by a U.S. company in the economic downturn. Chrysler said it will cut 3,000 more jobs and stop producing three vehicle models.

Meanwhile, the United Auto Workers union said it has reached a tentative agreement with GM, Chrysler and Ford on modifications to labor contracts. Such concessions were also a condition of the government bailout.

But the union was unable to make a deal with the Big Three on funding for a trust fund that will take over retiree health care costs starting next year.

Terms of the deal were not announced, but they were expected to eliminate the jobs bank in which laid-off workers get most of their pay, as well as make work rule and other changes that the government loan terms set out so the companies' labor costs are competitive with their Japanese counterparts that have U.S. factories.

Union President Ron Gettelfinger said in a statement that discussions are continuing with all three companies about billions of cash payments into the trust funds, called voluntary employees beneficiary associations.

GM said it could need up to $30 billion from the Treasury Department, up from a previous estimate of $18 billion. That includes $13.4 billion previously allocated and $9.1 billion in new loans. The world's largest automaker said it could run out of money by March without new funds.

GM's request includes a credit line of $7.5 billion to be used if the downturn in the auto industry is more pronounced than expected. But the automaker claimed it could be profitable in two years and fully repay its loans by 2017.

CBS News correspondent Anthony Mason reports that GM's survival plan is to sell or shut down its Saturn and Hummer bands.

GM is also trying to get its bondholders to accept about 30 cents on the dollar for its $27 billion in outstanding debt, reports Mason.

"It's better than nothing," says auto analyst Rebecca Lindland. "And that's really the alternative that we're looking at is if GM and Chrysler go bankrupt, nobody gets anything."

Chrysler LLC requested $5 billion in new loans on top of the $4 billion it received in December. The company had said it might need an extra $3 billion.

If time is running out for Chrysler, you may not be able to tell at its company headquarters, reports Mason. The company removed most of the clocks to save $20,000 a year on batteries.

It's also removed half of the 80,000 light bulbs to save $400,000 a year and turned down the temperature in hallways by four degrees to save $70,000 a year, reports Mason.

Both requests were part of restructuring plans the two automakers owed the government in exchange for earlier loans.

Ford, which borrowed billions from private sources before credit markets tightened, has said it can make it through 2009 without government help.

The restructuring plans must be vetted by the Obama administration's new autos task force. In a sign the administration views the U.S. steel industry as a case study for revamping the auto industry, one of the task force's appointees played a key role in the reshaping of that industry earlier this decade.

President Barack Obama's top spokesman told reporters aboard Air Force One on Tuesday that he wouldn't rule out bankruptcy for the Detroit automakers.

To prove they can survive as viable companies, both Chrysler and GM need to sharply reduce costs, leading to both companies' job cut announcements.

The GM job cuts include 10,000 salaried and 37,000 blue-collar positions, amounting to 19 percent of its current global work force of 244,500. A total 26,000 of the cuts will come from outside the U.S. The cuts would take place by the end of this year.

The new plan has the U.S. work force declining from about 92,000 hourly and salaried employees at year-end 2008 to 72,000 by 2012.

GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner said the plan submitted Tuesday is more aggressive than the one presented to the government on Dec. 2 because the global economy and auto sales have deteriorated in the time that has passed since then.

"Today's plan is significantly more aggressive because it has to be," Wagoner told reporters. "We have taken stronger actions, we needed to."

Chrysler had 54,007 employees at the end of 2008, so Tuesday's cuts would equal about 6 percent.

Chrysler said it now projects that automakers will sell 10.1 million vehicles in the U.S. this year, the lowest level in four decades.

Chrysler Vice Chairman and President Jim Press said in a conference call with reporters that the company will eliminate the Dodge Aspen, Durango and Chrysler PT Cruiser.

Employees at a GM plant in Michigan got word it will close months earlier than planned, reports Mason.

"Here I am, 46 and been working there for 20 years," said employee Lori Davis. "And I think, 'Now what?'"

The plans still have to be vetted by Treasury and the new autos task force announced by the Obama administration Sunday night.

The news came on a day when President Barack Obama signed into law a massive economic recovery plan. Signs that the recession is deepening were more immediate for investors, however, and they dumped stocks and pushed oil prices sharply lower.
CBS/ AP
335 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
laurainelkt1 says:
Nationalized health care?? NO THANKS! Ask people who actually live in the countries that have it...if you need surgery, you will not get it when you need it...just when they get around to it and then only if they want to. Some of us work very hard as owners of our own small businesses. We pay our own health care and it is not cheap...about $800 per month for my family. Years ago, we had some employees and offered them a choice of health care to be paid by us or increased salary. EVERY one of them took the money and didn''t care about health care. That is how people are. They want it for free while the rest of us work and pay more and more taxes til we are forced out of business. For years I have worked holidays, weekends, etc. to keep our business going. Re the auto industry, the unions have pushed for too much. Free legal services?? What other companies offer that? Salaries and benefits that are much more expensive than necessary are the reason the auto companies are in trouble. It''s sad to say but the UAW may not have much more time to keep making demands...there won''t be American auto companies left. Very sad for those of us who wish to continue to buy American.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
craigh9 says:
The pricing of their cars is so out of whack because of the outright greed of all parties involved.

Management has sucked so much money out to line their own pockets while the UAW got ridiculous wages/benefits approved knowing it one "kill the golden goose" but all both parties focused on was the present. Neither gave a hoot about the ramifications of their actions down the road. That is why they will never be able to fix the situation.
If both had been reasonable every car they make would be 25% less expensive which then brings those prodcuts to a realistic cost/value ratio and they would have had no difficulty handling the downturn in the economy - it would have had an impact still - but not to this level that these companies are experiencing
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sleepyric says:
GM and Chrysler: NOBODY CAN AFFORD YOUR CARS!. Make a GOOD Gas efficient car for around $10K, and you''ll be spared! Make the equivilent of the Beetle and buyers will come. Nobody right now can afford a $25K car except the luckily still employed, or the rich.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
craigh9 says:
This is all a really bad joke that just won''t go away.

I truly hope that government officals get their head far enough out of their rumps to finally realize that throwing money at this problem is useless.

BANKRUPTCY, let me say that again, BANKRUPTCY is THE ONLY ANSWER. These theives cannot work together to negotiate a deal to address the issue. It has to be an entity outside of the Big 3 and UAW that can look at this situation objectively and impose proper business practices if they are ever to get back on track.
Handing money to the Big 3 and UAW to fix this is akin to providing a rooster and hen to a wolf to repopulate a flock after he devoured them all - IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. Hello Congress, how about using just a little common sense on this one please.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
exusmcsgt says:
The US is is a capitalist country.

Capitalism is about competition. The most effecient survive, the least efficient fail.

Giving billions to GM and Chrysler is nothing more than rewarding ****-poor management.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
u-r-right says:
The cars will not sell no matter how much money the big three get as long as the people don''t have the confidence, money, credit and/or jobs to buy them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cheetah-man7 says:
Nationalize Health care and this is a non issue!


------------------------------------------------------

Posted by didserve

Another good idea! This country has its priorities all skewed.... help the people, not the greedy corporations that don''t care about their people - only their own bank accounts! Health care for ALL and let''s get it NOW!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cheetah-man7 says:
Stop wasting money on Nascar NOW !!!!!

------------------------------------------------------

Posted by acpang



THANK YOU! Finally someone with some common sense here! Get rid of those friggin redneck idiots in trashy cars and send them back to their mobile homes to watch TV and their confederate flags!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
woodjd42 says:
I say since you''re going to have massive layoffs anyway, let them fail. Or if they''re so important to the U.S. then nationalize them. Either way we are in trouble.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
deletedagain says:
The whole idea of the GM going off and doing their own restructuring along with the UAW is wrong. Their needs to be a neutral party that will make unbiased decisions which could and may include cuts from the top as well as the bottom.

No one at the top is gong to say "I will take a pay cut and reduce my bonuses". UAW will never say "In order to save your company you need to get rid of us".

The intent is to save jobs and not close 5 plants and put more people outFVCK THE UAW of work. Cut the *** retiree benefits and tell UAW to take a hike. Then maybe GM might be profitable selling their gas guzzling SUVs.
reply
See all 335 Comments