AP/ October 26, 2012, 9:52 PM

Dallas promoter demands refund from Armstrong

Lance Armstrong speaks to delegates at the World Cancer Congress in Montreal Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Graham Hughes)

Lance Armstrong speaks to delegates at the World Cancer Congress in Montreal Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Graham Hughes) / Graham Hughes

AUSTIN, Texas A Dallas promotions company that paid Lance Armstrong more than $7 million in bonuses for winning the Tour de France is demanding he return the money.

A spokesman for SCA Promotions said Friday the company will send Armstrong a demand letter on Monday now that Armstrong' seven Tour de France titles have been revoked. The company paid Armstrong about $7 million for winning his sixth tour in 2004 and reportedly paid up to $12 million total.

The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency recently reported extensive evidence that Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs during all seven of his tour victories. The International Cycling Union, the sport's governing body, on Monday accepted sanctions that included banning Armstrong from the sport for life and stripping him of his tour wins.

Armstrong denies doping but has not commented on the USADA report.

The company had warned Armstrong that it would seek return of the money if his victories were officially wiped out.

Armstrong's attorneys have said he has no intention of paying. They note that SCA entered a voluntary settlement to pay Armstrong, which included a no appeal clause. Armstrong's attorneys say Texas law won't allow SCA to try to reopen a voluntary settlement.

In a letter to SCA in June, Armstrong attorney Tim Herman wrote, "When SCA decided to settle the case, it settled the entire matter forever. No backs. No re-dos. No do-overs. SCA knowingly and independently waived any right to make further claims to any of the money it paid."

The company tried in 2005 to not pay Armstrong because of allegations in doping. The arbitration case included some of the original sworn witness testimony against Armstrong, including claims by Betsy Andreu, the wife of former Armstrong teammate Frankie Andreu, that Armstrong admitted taking performance-enhancing drugs in a conversation with doctors while undergoing cancer treatment in 1996.

Earlier Friday, the UCI said Armstrong should return about $4 million in prize money.

Armstrong recently lost most of his personal endorsement deals in the wake of the USADA report. He also has stepped down as chairman of the Livestrong cancer-fighting charity he founded in 1997.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
8 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djseavy says:
No Jesuit, not all of us wish ill on Armstrong. This entire situation stinks. The man has already been run through the mill. If you're so religious as your screen name applies, perhaps you'd better re-read your Bible. So far, the only accusations laid out have been against Armstrong. Other cyclists are claiming he "forced" them to dope, which I think is nothing more than their pre-emptry strike in case they end up being accused of doping. There's something very wrong here, and it isn't just on Armstrong's shoulders. For those who think they have it all figured out - take a breath. I have no doubt there's much more to come and the ending might surprise everyone.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Chain reactions- I wouldn't blindly disbelieve Armstrong's competition...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thomaszabita says:
After all this guys been thru you would think he would have stashed a good amount but I bet he was not smart enough to do so.Just thought the gravy train would be the gift that keeps on giving
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ritzbitz58 says:
Am I the only one who doesn't understand why people are asking for money back that they donated to a charity? What does his charity have to do with the doping scandal? The answer; NOTHING! His doping and his charity are two ENTIRELY different things. Asking for money back from a charity that supports cancer research and awareness..... that's pretty low.
reply
Teddybearwithashotgun replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HELLOOOO DID YOU SKIM THE ARTICLE ?THEY ARE REQUESTING HE REPAY BONUSES NOT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION
linkicon reporticon emailicon
emma_maria says:
Boy, this joker is in trouble. He'll be filing for bankruptcy and/or he'll end up in jail. Just goes to show you, I don't know how or why, but you do wrong, I don't care who you are and how good you are at it, eventually it ALWAYS catches up with you..
reply
Rafterman11 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There's no debtor's prisons. You don't go to jail for bankruptcy.
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rafterman11 -

Yet.

Let the congress that's bought and paid for by the 1% pass a few more bills to remove regulations that prevent lending companies from capping APRs (especially after plenty of % cuts from Bernanke)... then reinstate debtors' prisons... Have a job but get a huge pay cut? Doesn't matter if you're at fault or if someone else pulled out the rug... but who needs ethics or decency? Just supply-side profit, at everyone else's expense.

Thankfully, a case for "entrapment" can be brought about. Especially with wages continuing to be depressed, job losses, lack of opportunities, and everything else people should be conscious of these days... you don't make the system and then blame the people for living in it.

From CBS Sports

    Latest Headlines