prev
next
Political Eye 
© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
WH: Hagel less than perfect but confirmation on track
Former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee during his confirmation hearing to become the next secretary of defense on Capitol Hill January 31, 2013 in Washington, D.C. / Alex Wong / Getty Images
Updated: Feb. 1, 12:57 p.m. ET
While the White House concedes that Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel's performance at his confirmation hearing today was less than perfect, they're confident about his chances of clearing the Senate.
The official line is the White House hopes and expects the confirmation process to proceed smoothly and expeditiously and that Hagel's performance before the Senate Armed Services Committee today did not materially undermine his prospects.
"I think Senator Hagel answered the questions appropriately and did a fine job," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Friday in a press briefing. "I would be stunned if, in the end, Republican senators chose to try to block the nomination of a decorated war veteran who was once among their colleagues in the Senate as a Republican."
- Hagel grilled at confirmation hearing, defends record
- For Hagel, a rocky but probable path to Pentagon
Privately, White House advisers concede Hagel's appearance was far from perfect and good have and should have been stronger. This doesn't mean or even suggest White House advisers are despairing or believe anything Hagel did was ruinous. To the contrary. They believe Hagel got by - but with less margin for error than they would have preferred.
In short, the White House sees no erosion among Senate Democrats. The tough line of questioning from Republicans was expected and the White House, at this point, doesn't anticipate or fear a GOP filibuster.
Additionally, the White House and Democrats will make the post-hearing case that Republicans were far more interested in pressing Hagel on past votes and past remarks than current and future U.S. national security hotspots such as Afghanistan and Iraq (now, as compared to the "surge" debate), Mali, Libya, the South China Sea, North Korea or Yemen. The White House and Democrats will soon say Republicans were trivializing the process by reaching back into Hagel's record, something Republicans consider laughable and politically contrived.
Bottom line: Hagel was a Weeble. He wobbled but he didn't fall down.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 421 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 158 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 89 Comments
- IRS scandal highlights leadership vacancies
- Former IRS chief: "I can't say" what led to IRS targeting
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1124 Comments
- Letter to a young scandalmonger
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
I am a former Army Officer, Central Highlands of Vietnam.
William Patirot
Here is my definition of "hypocrisy":
Just four years ago, McCain and Hagel were personally and politically close, bound by their service in Vietnam and their well-polished maverick GOP brands. McCain, the GOP's 2008 presidential nominee, said that year he would be honored to put Hagel in his Cabinet.
"and this has to do with hagel not being able to answer any questions because..... BTW....McCain wasn't the only one grilling him--"
Try looking up "hypocrisy" I know it is a big would that you obviously are not familiar with...
BUT.... you are correct, that is a big word--- let me see if can spell "hypocrite"...I think I have two ways to spell it:
#1- O-B-A-M-A
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can't pay its own bills. ... I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit."
#2- G-O-R-E: taking Big Oil Money when all he preaches about is Global Warming
How'd I do?
Deals With Iraq Are Set to Bring Oil Giants Back
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/19/world/middleeast/19iraq.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
If elected president, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) would provide $39 billion in federal help for oil and gas companies over the next five years. McCain supports the continuation of many of the current subsidies, which will total $33 billion over the next five years. While McCain would repeal some of these subsidies, he would also pass a corporate tax cut that would be worth more than $22 billion to America's five largest oil companies over the next five years.