Political Eye
By

Stephanie Condon /

CBS News/ January 22, 2013, 4:39 PM

White House: Obama won't veto GOP short-term debt limit plan

The White House said today that President Obama would not veto a House Republican plan to suspend the debt limit for three months, even though the president thinks a temporary solution is far from ideal.

"The Administration would not oppose a short-term solution to the debt limit and looks forward to continuing to work with both the House and the Senate to increase certainty and stability for the economy," the White House said in an official statement of policy released today.

The House plans to vote tomorrow on a bill to suspend the nation's $16.4 trillion debt limit until mid-May, giving Congress more time to negotiate over the limit. The bill would also require the House and Senate to pass a budget. If either chamber failed to pass a budget, according to this proposal, their congressional salaries would be withheld.

"All we're saying is, if the president and the Senate, if this country needs to incur more debt, Senate, please show us your plan to repay that debt, please show us your plan to control spending," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said this evening.

The House bill, the White House statement of policy warned, "introduces unnecessary complications, needlessly perpetuating uncertainty in the Nation's fiscal system." However, it said that the administration is encouraged the bill "lifts the immediate threat of default and indicates that congressional Republicans have backed off an insistence on holding the Nation's economy hostage to extract drastic cuts in Medicare, education, and other programs that middle-class families depend on."

Should Congress fail to raise the debt limit, the nation could potentially default on its loans, which economists say would have a severe economic impact. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has informed Congress that the Treasury is expected to exhaust its borrowing authority by mid-February or early March.

Republicans are intent on reducing spending in exchange for raising the nation's borrowing authority. President Obama and Democrats, however, say there should be no conditions attached to the debt limit, since it covers debt already racked up in Washington -- not future spending.

"We can continue to engage -- and we will -- with members of Congress, over the need to further reduce our deficit in a balanced way," White House spokesman Jay Carney said today. "The president has put forward plans, as you know, that demonstrate the fact that he is willing to compromise, that he is willing to meet Republicans halfway on these issues, and he will continue to do that. But the debt ceiling needs to not be a part of that, because it's terrible for the economy, and it seems also to be bad politics."

Republicans, however, say that tax revenue increases are off the table now. That part of the discussion ended, they say, when Washington let the Bush-era tax rates expire for the top 1 percent. Now, the GOP says it's only willing to discuss spending cuts as a means of deficit reduction.

"The tax issue is over," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, told reporters. "I would venture to say there is not a single Republican vote in the House or Senate to provide more revenue, and the reason for that is we all know revenue is not the problem... This not a revenue problem, this is a spending problem."

At a closed-door meeting with House GOP conference members, a source in the room tells CBS News, House Speaker John Boehner told members that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan will be working with the conference to draft a budget by April 15. With the right reforms in place, Paul's goal is to advance a budget that balances within a decade, Boehner said.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
39 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ronjula-2012 says:
here's a guy who says he want to cut us from our "entitlements". as this guy states 'i cannot go without a pay check', what a self centered idiot. so why does he want people who recieve Social Security, and V.A.Benefits have their checks cut short in the future. We earned those Benefits after putting our lives on battlefields after they (congress) declare war, and after we've worked hard through-out our lives, and paying into Retirement for Social Security. this guy has drank to much expensive wine, and it has effected his brain
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobw101 says:
GhostF1ghter says:
Baggers would rather die for ideology than face reality.

This is why you lose.

------------

No, the reason they lose is because they are big spending statists warmongers, who have to take a poll every morning in order to know what they believe that day. They have no convictions and are concerned about nothing except where the next campaign contribution is coming from. They are very much like their colleagues on the other side of the isle.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Texasnotea says:
Sure it can't continue like this, but the gop'ers want to dismantle social security, medicare and medicaid because they think 47% of the population are freeloaders. That just isn't true. What is true is the gop'ers are being lied to by their leaders and they don't ask the right questions. Ask your people in charge if all 47% of the people are all freeloaders and then listen to them stumble to give a straight answer. That's why they want to burn down the barn to get rid of the rats! And there are some rats, but not all of them are rats.
reply
dionysusBeer replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They're way too involved in their pretend wars (war on religion, war on Christmas, war on men, the culture war, war on marriage, etc) to ask any questions about the GOP. I've found plenty wrong with Obama and the Democrats but there's much more wrong with the GOP. But if you ask a Teaper they'll say that 100% of the blame is on the Democrats. As if the GOP is somehow immune to criticism.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dionysusBeer says:
Alright, now we're getting somewhere. And with Congress' pay on the line you won't believe how well they'll learn to compromise. This was a great idea.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rafterman11 says:
ULGNUD replies: Don't be silly. Obama offered handouts and the GOP didn't. The liberals control most of the media. In simple terms that is how he got back in. It has little to do with repudiation.

---------

It will make the Dem's job of winning future elections so much simpler if you 'cons continue to believe that. Thanks. I mean, really, thanks. I'm sure its so much easier to believe that than to think you are flawed in some way or have an unpopular message. That way, like a good conservative, you will never have to change anything about yourself. Life is so much simpler that way, when you can blame others for your own problems and faults.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
collie61 says:
"The White House said today that President Obama would not veto a House Republican plan to suspend the debt limit for three months". Why? Simple, the do nothing Senate has not acted and will not act.
reply
thechooch1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
collie61 the "do nothing Senate" will pass any reasonable budget submitted by the House. The key word is reasonable. Not some tea party bill that tries to guts Social Security, Medicare and other programs.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimatmadison says:
Here's a news flash: The next budget proposals from the Democrats will all include 'revenue enhancements' (tax increases).

This is long, long overdue. The Republicans were eager to talk in generic terms about all of the tax loopholes they were willing to close in the presidential campaign, and in the first round of 'fiscal cliff' talks.

Now, we'll hopefully see them follow through and go along with the Dems on actually closing them. I'm a top 20%er which puts me in the meat of the highest paying people in terms of percentages.

When people making ten or a hundred times what I earn pay little or nothing, that's something that needs to be fixed. When highly profitable corporations pay little or nothing, or in some cases get subsidies of my tax dollars, that needs to get fixed.

If they want to raise my tax rate, go ahead, as long as everybody who makes more than me pays at least the same total rate that I do, regardless of whether they make their money by working for it like I do, or by moving money around, or by inheriting it.

OK, Republicans, let's see if you'll follow through on what you said you are willing to do.
reply
collie61 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Your rambling left out the fact that Phil Mickelson who is in your 'tax shelter' category pays 63% in taxes. There is a minusule few who seek tax shelters. Stop making it sound like they all do. Remember, over 40% of income earning Americans do not pay any federal taxes. Maybe you can comment about them. Not.
pt100455 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sounds like we have a mittens 47%'er here folks. Where were you guys when this was discussed, numerous times? In your bunkers I suppose. Here's the facts...the majority of your 40% (mittens 47%?) of Americans that do not pay income taxes are-senior citizens on Soc.Sec. from the Years of work they paid Into SS, the military coming back from risking their lives to Save Your Sorry A$$ & can't find work, the disabled who Can't work (including the military), only small minded radical right wing teabaggers refuse to admit to the who the majority of the '47%' Really Are (changing it to 40% doesn't fool anyone about who's a$$ your head is up). Use the brain God gave you & research facts before 'believing as truth' on something you've heard on Faux Noise, Limblob, Hannity, Beck, etc.,etc.
"A minuscule (sp ck-try it) few who seek tax shelters" are You Serious? There is more money of the top 2% & corporations overseas than this country will ever see. *sigh* go away until you have something valid to say.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GhostF1ghter says:
Baggers would rather die for ideology than face reality.

This is why you lose.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lucky12345678 says:
This is such a joke, just cut spending stop playing these games... They put an end to the Bush temporary tax cuts, now let's do the same with the budget deficit... Eat your peas!!!@!!
reply
Texasnotea replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We had a balanced budget before eight years of Bush.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WireNewsCo says:
So the plan is to NOT increase the limit, but to allow the government to exceed the limit. Does anyone actually believe this nonsense? What's the chance of the U.S. paying down the over-spend in May when the 3 months 'grace' expires? The government cannot pay down the current debt.
reply
See all 39 Comments