NRA ad: Obama an "elitist hypocrite" on gun violence
This post was updated at 11:53 a.m. ET
President Obama's agenda to reduce gun violence will be unveiled today at the White House, but the National Rifle Association is not waiting to react, preempting Mr. Obama's announcement with a hard-hitting ad that blasts the president as an "elitist hypocrite."
"Are the president's kids more important than yours?" the ad asks. "Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their schools?"
In the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., the NRA proposed stationing an armed guard in every school in America to prevent school shootings, but the president has expressed his aversion to the proposal.
In a bit of a non-sequitur, the NRA's ad links the president's resistance to their proposal to his call for the wealthy to pay more taxes.
"Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he's just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security."
The result, according to the NRA? "Protection for their kids and gun-free zones for ours."
CBS News Political Director John Dickerson noted today on "CBS This Morning," the ad is "about hypocrisy, not safety," pushing emotional buttons unrelated to gun policy to stir up broader opposition to Mr. Obama's proposals.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney condemned the NRA's ad as "repugnant and cowardly," telling CBS News Chief White House Correspondent Major Garrett, "Most Americans agree that a president's children should not be used as pawns in a political fight. But to go so far as to make the safety of the President's children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly."
And Mr. Obama's former press secretary and senior adviser, Robert Gibbs, also minced no words in reaction, calling the ad "disgusting on many levels" on MSNBC.
"It's also just stupid," said Gibbs. "This reminds me of an ad that somebody made at about 2 o'clock in the morning after one too many drinks, and no one stopped it in the morning."
The ad is reportedly airing on the Sportsman Channel, and the NRA has not ruled out buying air time on other networks.
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 107 Comments
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 98 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror?
- Rep. Jo Bonner to resign from House for university job
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- Obama: America at a "crossroads" in fighting terrorism 106 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- Obama to tour Jersey Shore with Gov. Christie














1. The Clinton Ban had measurable non-impact on assault weapons being used in mass killing events with 15 events during the 10 year ban. There were 16 events in the 10 years preceding the Clinton Ban, and there have been 14 in the 9 years since.
2. Plugs can be made to be inserted in larger magazines just as with pump shotguns. Why introduce new magazines? There are already a billion magazines out there. After all, all laws are to help decent law abiding people. Simply suggest to gun owners they need not load all the way up.
I am ALWAYS willing to talk to other people about any subject - until it starts turning into an argument, and that's where it stops for me. I WILL NOT argue with ANYONE over any subject - talk yes, argue no. Because as I stated in the beginning of my earlier comment, this was MY opinion on the SUBJECT, I didn't say you (or anyone else) had to agree with it. That's what this country's all about - freedom of speech - don't ya' just love it! I had my say-so, and you've had yours - and only on MY comment. I truly feel special that you've singled me out. So obviously, you feel that only YOUR opinion is the ONE that matters.
So as I said, I WILL NOT argue with you over THIS SUBJECT, as we both have very different opinions on the matter. But I will address some of the points in your comment as they are against me as a person:
1) "Spoken like a true immature, unfeeling, uncaring, unthinking,ignorant, selfish person, who lost nobody she loves, OR HATES, in any massacre by a nutcase with an assault weapon."
- Considering you've never met me or even know me, in voicing my opinion which differs from yours, you feel the need to call me lowly names?? So why is that?? Well, if you're going to act in a childish manner by calling names, then I will play your game to the end of (sticking my tongue out at you), "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me!" Uh oh, should we ban sticks and stones too?!
- I NEVER addressed the subject of assault weapons and the destruction they can bring, just weapons in general.
2) "No normal gun, used by millions of people in our country, for any number of sane activities, has been banned."
- I DID NOT make any reference to ANY guns being banned, so obviously you felt the need to go off on me about something you're upset about and decided that I would be your whipping post.
3) "Why would any fool try to DEFEND insane murderers? Or the weapon USED by those insane murderers?"
- This I agree with - what FOOL would defend the weapons or the insane murderers using them to kill people. I'm sorry to have to tell you you're WRONG AGAIN, in attacking me for MY ***** opinion, but AGAIN, I DID NOT defend ANY insane murderer, or their choice of weapon, or their actions.
4) "For THIS, you decided you had to cuss, throw a childish temper tantrum, and make a fool of yourself!?"
- AGAIN, I only expressed my ***** opinion, just as others were doing - about THE SUBJECT. I DID NOT sling mud at anyone in particular - well, maybe the President - but no person, group, etc., in particular. And even in mentioning the President, I didn't really do any mudslinging, just asking questions.
- Threw a childish temper tantrum and made a fool of myself??!! OBVIOUSLY, with your post, you showed more of a childish/foolish temperament that I could ever possibly come up with, even if I chose to. Your comment was not so much giving your ***** opinion on THE SUBJECT, but VERBALLY ATTACKING ME about my ***** opinion!!!
5) "Any paranoid individual who had the behavior you describe is not in his/her right mind either,so should probably never handle any weapons at all!"
- Unless you're a professional, licensed therapist, can you decide that I am paranoid? And even if it just so happens to be that you are a therapist, you would have to see me, get to know me and how I think about ALL things, to make a determination of that sort. So I think you need to think first, before trying to psychoanalyze people - ESPECIALLY THOSE YOU DON'T KNOW.
- And whether or not I handle weapons is not for you to decide, now is it?
So in defending my character - for which you decided was lower than low - I'm done. May you have a truly blessed day!!!!!!!!!!!!
2. dont worry about how immature someone is if you make an intelligent argument they will see theyre dumbness. just call them out on their hypocrysy dont tell them to shut up just because their stupid?! use it against them. if you want freedom of speech you have to let them argue.
3. dont get too big on the meaning of words like argue, talk, debate. especially (debate and arguing they are so close to the same) the meaning of words change over time like gay used to mean happy. if you let your emotions rule you when someone is just calling you names youl never be able to make a point.
4. know how someone will respond. dont say something that will only make them call you more names. say something that makes them
defend theyre argument. also realize no matter how dumb they are, we are all people and they may bring something good to the argument(debate). the problem with this country is FOX news isnt allowed to presidential news conferences. Theyre like the only REPUBLICAN station. OBAMA sure as hell doesnt believe in opinions.
All im saying is that name calling is all OBAMA does. And it has seperated us like crazy. do you ever remember 5 years ago going online and getting this involved in a battle against someone you dont know. yeah well thats exactly what he wants us all to do. just call each other names. so let the arguments continue intellignenty!
Even the most insane criminal cannot shoot people without a gun. Guns do not provide peace or security. Shoot your way to peace.
How about I let you in on a secret. It is not the goverments job to protect the individual. It is not the police's job to protect the individual ask the Supreme Court they ruled on it. That is why we have the Second Amendment in place so we can protect and defend ourselves and our country against tyranny weather that be from the individual or from a tyranical goverment.
Please take some time and research what happened to other countries when gun laws were introduced. Dont take my word for anything just research it you will find the truth if you look. If anyone cares to take the time to look.
As far as the Ad. The truth always hurts!
You know - let's just call a spade, a f___king shovel, OK??!! It all boils down to this - has ANYONE ever seen a gun pick itself up and shoot people??!! No - really, I'm being totally serious!!! I've never experienced this before, as I know no one else has either. You know why???? - Because guns are inanimate objects - they CANNOT and never will be able to kill anyone all by themselves!!!!!!!!!!! That's like me possibly wondering if the nail clippers on my side table will decide to pick itself up and come stab me (or clip my nails incessantly) without me having to do anything. HELLLLOOOOO - WAKE UP PEOPLE (MR. PRESIDENT), it's the "crazies" behind the gun that kills people. For God's sake, GET REAL!!!!!!
What would happen if all of a sudden, say, instead of using guns, the "crazies" out there decide to use a frozen chicken or turkey? You know, with just the right blow to the head, you could kill someone. Granted, you probably can't "take out" as many people as you can with a gun - BUT, it could still be a killing weapon. So if it became the "norm" for people to use for killing, then does the President force a ban on people buying/selling chickens/turkeys; or a ban on having chickens/turkeys in the country considering what could happen if they were frozen; OR would he put a ban on freezers??!! Decisions, Decisions, Decisions - I just don't know how the President does it. Day in/day out, he has to have these things on his mind constantly, 24/7!!!!!!
Lord, I just don't know if I could be President - what WOULD I do if I had to force a ban on large rocks, baseball bats, vehicles of ALL types, rope, pillows, water, kitchen utensils, fire, avalanches of ALL types, certain farm equipment/lawn equipment/pesticides, household cleaning products, antifreeze, all dogs, scissors, medications - especially prescription, razor blades, knives of ANY kind, barbed wire, etc., etc., etc. (Trust me; it took some time to come up with all those, since I'm not one of those "crazies" out there.)
So now, once the people found out that the President has decided to pass some strict gun laws, what have the people done??!! - GONE OUT AND BOUGHT GUNS AND AMMO LIKE THERE'S NO TOMORROW!!!!!! And guess what? - If all those people have done this, are you going to try and convince me that the "crazies" are not stocking up also?!!
Tell me, Mr. President, is that what you were looking for to happen? - Because it has. Possessing, dealing, using illegal drugs is against the law - BUT, does that stop drugs from either being brought into this country, or being grown in this country, or being used??!! HELL NO - so just as with drugs, guns will always be available, some way- somehow - for those willing to pay for them or steal them.
I REALLY think that instead of rushing head-long into TRYING to solve this problem (just like ALL other government issues are approached) it needs to be thought out carefully and all avenues discussed. But then again, I've learned in the past several years, that the government doesn't take the time to TRULY investigate issues and come up with solutions that work for the people - only what works for the government.