GOP Rep. Cotton: Women in combat could impair missions
Republican Rep. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, a freshman representative who has served in two wars, said Tuesday afternoon that women shouldn't be allowed in infantry combat roles because it's not conducive to their "nature."
"To have women serving in infantry, though, could impair the mission-essential tasks of units," Cotton said on Laura Ingraham's radio show. "And that's been proven in study after study, just from a matter of -- it's nature, upper body strength, and physical movements, and speed, and endurance, and so forth."
Mediate reports that Cotton did commend women's accomplishments in non-combat military roles.
The conservative congressman, who has two Harvard degrees and served in Iraq and Afghanistan with the U.S. Army, was elected in 2012 to represent Arkansas' fourth district with financial help from the conservative advocacy group Club for Growth.
A 1994 combat exclusion policy bans women from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level, but a group of military women is suing the Pentagon to overturn the ban.
In February of last year, the Pentagon recommended that women be allowed to serve in jobs closer to the front lines, prompting then-Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum to express "concerns" similar to Cotton's. "I do have concerns about women in front line combat," he said. "I think that could be a very compromising situation where - where people naturally, you know, may do things that may not be in the interests of the mission because of other types of emotions that are involved."
Popular in Politics
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 327 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 152 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 346 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 262 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 414 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 242 Comments
However, never under estimate the strength, wit and intuition of a woman. Some of those comments may have a slight bit of truth when it comes to size or physical ability but still. I'm beginning to think its time woman just take over the whole world and get things straightened out. I swear to God himself, where is the Republican party finding these guys???? They are not like the men I know. Bizarre, I can't take much more of this prehistoric thinking.
Look out the women are coming and we are going to **** ***.
Ben Jorden, this is one thing we can agree on. Darn right your want a woman next to you in combat. We can be lean, mean, fighting machines, yet profession thinkers.
This serves to illustrate the beauty of certain types of bvll$h^t propaganda -- whenever, and wherever, these popularly-and-oft-quoted idiocies turn up in conversation, they stand out immediately, like little radioactive nuggets, which you can then trace back to the source -- and it's quite entertaining, to witness firsthand, how in these cases, "all roads" seem inevitably to "lead to [a certain type of] Rome." Can anyone spell "Progressive?" And its etymological ancestor, "Marxist?"
Here in this country most men are wired to protect their wives, daughters, sisters, girlfriends and mothers from harm.
Our troops have enough on their hands and on their minds without having to worry about what is almost an instinctual reaction to deal with.
Well, short-timers, it isn't going to work. America is still the home of the free and the brave. We'll continue to oppose these stupid plans until the very thought of getting another Republican elected is all but laughable!
Now, if you want to come back to reason and compromise, and do the right thing by ALL Americans, not just the Southern HICKS, there's still time to turn the ship around...but, not much.