
President Barack Obama arrives at the start of an interfaith vigil for the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting on Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012 at Newtown High School in Newtown, Conn. A gunman walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School Friday and opened fire, killing 26 people, including 20 children. / AP Photo/Evan Vucci
Two days after the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., President Obama is visiting the grief-stricken town tonight to take part in an interfaith vigil and meet with victims' families and first responders.
On Friday, following the news of the massacre, the president told the nation: "As a country, we have been through this too many times." For Mr. Obama, his visit to Connecticut will be his third trip to a site following a mass shooting in the past 23 months. In January 2011, he took part in a vigil following the mass shooting that injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., and this past July, Mr. Obama met with victims' families following the massacre at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo.
During his remarks on Friday, Mr. Obama said, "I know there's not a parent in America who doesn't feel the same overwhelming grief I do" and noted that the majority of the victims were "children, beautiful little kids... They had their entire lives ahead of them, birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own."
Word of a presidential visit to Newtown spread earlier Saturday when the mayor of nearby Danbury, Mark Boughton, tweeted that helicopters heard over the area were part of a presidential advance team.
"Those helicopters you hear are the Presidential advance team," Boughton wrote on Twitter. "They are scouting landing locations."
Blood and Death; let's not allow part of us to die...
2nd amendment is fine, but buying multiple semi-automatic guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition and claiming it "freedom" is a sure sign of a Neanderthal.
That must change. President Obama and congress, show some common sense and leadership.
Many gun nuts will be upset, but sensible gun owners will realize that the other side does not want to take away their right for self-protection. Only put in the checks to reduce the probability of such mindless acts, esp. against children.
The Neanderthal proposal that school teachers be armed is foolish and further exposes their pimp-hood to the gun lobby. An attempt to sell more. Shame!
Second, criminals and the insane do not obey gun laws, only good law abiding citizens do. Therefore all gun laws do is disarm good people or reduce their protection.
Third, insane people who want to kill others will not be stopped by the lack of guns. A can of gasoline and a match will work just as well. A man in China with a knife killed two and slashed 22 small school children the other day. Another Chinese man killed 8 with a knife. Neither could get access to a gun.
Here are some facts from Australia after they enacted a gun ban:
From the National Center For Policy Analysis in 2009:
It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. In 2002 -- five years after enacting its gun ban -- the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed
with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner. Even Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:
In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent. Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
You're repeating stupid talking points from gun nuts. I don't know how many times I've heard in the past couple of days "gun free zones....."
YOu want teachers to carry guns? How many teachers would actually carry guns?
You want everyone to go around on the street carrying guns so they can shoot anyone they disagree with or someone who is playing music too loudly?
Your comment is pure bull.
You are pathetic, diddy.
Second, criminals and the insane do not obey gun laws, only good law abiding citizens do. Therefore all gun laws do is disarm good people or reduce their protection.
Third, insane people who want to kill others will not be stopped by the lack of guns. A can of gasoline and a match will work just as well. A man in China with a knife killed two and slashed 22 small school children the other day. Another Chinese man killed 8 with a knife. Neither could get access to a gun.
Here are some facts from Australia after they enacted a gun ban:
From the National Center For Policy Analysis in 2009:
It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. In 2002 -- five years after enacting its gun ban -- the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed
with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner. Even Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:
In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent. Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
I'm a dad of 4. I can't just sit idly by. I'm part of 'Ryan's Team' on Crowdrise, whose overall goal is to reach $50,000. Thanks for considering...
http://www.crowdrise.com/shsrelief/fundraiser/jasonfried