After Sandy, Bill Clinton rails against Romney on global warming
Former President Bill Clinton gestures while speaking at a Students for Obama rally at the University of Minnesota's McNamara Alumni Center, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012, in Minneapolis.
/ AP Photo/Jim Mone
President Obama has temporarily suspended his campaign events in the wake of Superstorm Sandy, but former President Bill Clinton hit the trail on his behalf in Minnesota today and used the storm to explain why the president should be re-elected.
Speaking before a crowd of students at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, Mr. Clinton recalled watching "the triumph of the moderate Mitt Romney" in the first presidential debate.
"He ridiculed the president for his efforts to fight global warming in economically efficient ways," Mr. Clinton said, adding that Romney said to the president mockingly, "You're going to turn back the seas." (While energy policy did come up in the debates, Romney never said that).
Mr. Clinton continued, "In my part of America, we would've liked it if somebody could've done that yesterday." The former president noted that cities like New York have to implement policies to prepare for the changing climate and said, "In the real world, Barack Obama's policies work better."
Specifically, Mr. Clinton criticized Romney for opposing tax credits for wind and solar energy, noting that 175,000 Americans are employed in those sectors. Wind and solar jobs are "good, middle-class jobs," Mr. Clinton said, while the United States has one of the world's highest capacities for wind and solar energy. "Why in the world would we walk away from that?" he asked.
The former president was making two campaign stops today at college campuses in Minnesota. The state should be a safe one for Mr. Obama, but the most recent poll there shows the president with just a three-point lead as Romney gains ground.
Mr. Clinton told the students the election is about "three big questions": which candidate is more likely to restore prosperity to the middle class, which is more likely to build a 21st century economy, and which candidate is more likely to keep the nation on the road towards a more perfect union.
"Amidst all of our differences, on those questions I don't think it's a close question," he continued. "Despite his 11th hour conversion to moderate rhetoric in the debates, Gov. Romney has not changed his position on the fundamental issues or his fundamental argument against the president."
Mr. Clinton took on Romney's promise to create 12 million jobs over the next four years, pointing out that independent analysts predict the economy, as long as it keeps moving in the right direction, should produce 12 million new jobs anyway.
"In other words, the argument is throw this guy out for the 12 million jobs that his policies made possible," he said. "I think the guy who should be at the helm is the person whose policies created those jobs to give us a more perfect union."
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 206 Comments
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
His exact line was: "President Obama promised to slow the rise of the oceans and to heal the planet. My promise is to help you and your family." It was received with quite a bit of laughter. Because apparently for Mitt and Co., global warming is funny - like terrorizing your dog or assaulting a gay classmate.
'Pull my finger and I'll show you my hot toxic gases and some global warming'
When you see Bill waving his crooked finger you know he's lying about having sex with someone or lying about something else.
We are still waiting for the Ice Age that the left wingers said was was coming back in the 1970's among other disasters that never materialized.
Panetto, Ptaki, Cutter, etc, etc, will all be making travel plans...Hello Chicago, remember me?
CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere. It's simply a fact; if you don't believe me, ask physics or chemistry. Human activity since the industrial revolution has exponentially increased the rate at which greenhouse gases are emitted. We have been pumping CO2 and methane into the atmosphere, in the form of cars and factories and cows, much faster than nature can remove it. And as a result, global temperatures have increased consistently over the past century.
Scientists have been predicting for decades that global warming would increase the size and frequency of hurricanes. And their prediction has come true. Can you attribute any one storm, like superstorm Sandy, to global warming? No. But huge storms like this will become more and more frequent, and hopefully one day the climate change-deniers will stop lying to themselves and say, "enough is enough."
Why does global warming increase hurricane strength and frequency? A warmer climate means that the atmosphere can hold more moisture, which is fuel for hurricanes to grow. It also means that sea surface temperature is increasing, which makes it more likely for hurricanes to form in the first place, because hurricanes derive their energy from warm ocean water. Finally, as polar ice caps melt and sea level rises, storm surge (a bulge in sea level due to low air pressure) will penetrate further inland, threatening cities further inland. We've already seen how destructive Sandy was.
How many people have to die for the greed of conservative politicians and their antiquated, destructive propaganda?