Sports Blog
June 19, 2010 8:48 AM

Analyst: Why FIFA Won't Let Ref Explain His Call

By
Chris Matyszczyk
Topics

Jozy Altidore, left, and Herculez Gomez, right, of the United States' team remonstrate with referee Koman Coulibaly of Mali, during the World Cup match between Slovenia and the U.S. at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, South Africa, Friday, June 18, 2010.

(Credit: AP Photo/Luca Bruno)
There is something very reassuring about the rage surrounding the U.S. goal disallowed by Koman Coulibaly, the referee from Mali, during the final minutes of a pulsating World Cup game against Slovenia on Friday.

All the anger — when ESPN analysts offer anger, you know this is serious — shows that the U.S. can care about football; it just needs sufficient incentive.

What is truly curious, though, is that FIFA, the body that runs world football, so far seems to have decided that Coulibaly doesn't need to explain his reasons for disallowing the 86th-minute goal by Maurice Edu for the U.S.

"We asked the ref many times what it was or who it was on and he wouldn't or couldn't explain it. I don't know what to think of the call because I didn't see any foul, just a normal free kick and a goal," said Landon Donavan of the U.S. team.

Coulibaly may never have to give a press conference. He never even has to send so much as an e-mail of explanation. He will never have to apologize.

He will never have to be, in short, Jim Joyce.

Joyce was the umpire who managed to blow the call that denied Detroit pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game when he called safe a runner, who was at least half-a-pace out.

Complete Coverage: World Cup 2010

Joyce performed a mea culpa. He was on the verge of tears. Players and managers even rallied around him, as many felt he was the best umpire in baseball.

Coulibaly might speak after the World Cup is over. He might. Yet FIFA's archaic, absurd, arrogant rules mean that there is no compunction for either him or FIFA to even explain what the foul was given for.

Like the Vatican, FIFA really doesn't see that explanations are terribly helpful. Indeed, FIFA would prefer it if you'd all just go and talk about something else.

Coulibaly's call cannot have been offside, because the assistant's flag would have been evident. So presumably he believes he saw some kind of infringement, some kind of holding.

But most neutral observers saw far more transgressions at that free-kick committed by the Slovenians. What the Americans might have done is an utter mystery.

It is a mystery that the arrogant leaders of FIFA plan never to have to answer. Because the more they answer, the more you know. And too much knowledge is a dangerous thing. Better to keep the mystery.

Yahoo Sports says it has inside information that a "deeper assessment" of Coulibaly's performance will be undertaken by FIFA's refereeing committee "at the earliest possible opportunity."

Whenever that might be.

But the outcome is likely to be that of other referees who have made appalling decisions in World Cups.

No one will rally around Coulibaly. Instead, in classic Communist tradition, he will very probably be exiled, never to be heard from again. (At least, not during these World Cup finals.)

Though it's hard for us in America to gain perspective, his wasn't the worst decision ever made in World Cup play.

Take, for example, the World Cup semi-final of 1982. In this pulsating game, German goalkeeper Harald Schumacher blatantly assaulted France's Patrick Battiston.

Dutch referee Charles Corver behaved as if he saw nothing at all, even though Battiston was stretchered away and ended up in a hospital in a coma, while Germany went on to win on penalties.

And imagine how those in Ireland must currently feel about Swedish referee Marin Hansson, who managed to miss not one, but two handballs by France's Thierry Henry in a final 2010 World Cup qualifying match against the Irish.

The handballs led directly to a winning goal. Hansson's myopia (and that of his assistants) didn't merely cost the Irish the game. It cost them passage to the World Cup finals.

This was the third highly controversial moment in Hansson's international refereeing career. He had made dubious decisions in the Champions League and in the Confederations Cup.

But because he was already pre-selected before the France/Ireland game, he is in South Africa. He is the fourth official for Saturday's game between the Netherlands and Japan. But he won't be allowed to referee a game. Not unless every half-competent referee turns up lame.

He's like the disgraced party member who is left pouring the tea for the Politburo.

When nerves are calmer — and if the U.S. qualifies for the next round — reactions to Coulibaly will become more muted.

All great coaches tell their players that they should never put themselves in a position in which a referee can decide a game. Put the thing beyond doubt yourselves. Don't make stupid mistakes. Don't defend naively. Score a lot more goals than the opposition. Don't give a bad referee an excuse to destroy your chances.

Unfortunately, against Slovenia, the U.S. was having to exit from a mess very much of its own making.

That it almost registered a win was a great credit to its resilience, but not a great credit to its first half performance.

One can only hope that Coulibaly's decision will not ultimately affect the destiny of America's chances.

The truth is, though, that FIFA doesn't really care. When pressed to replay the Ireland/France game, it made statements of puffery about the "purity" of the game.

In Coulibaly's case, answers are unlikely to be forthcoming until matters are settled on the field, until time has had its wicked way. If they are forthcoming at all.

It's like plane crashes. You never seem to hear about what caused them until months or years later.

The lessons for the U.S., as well as for other teams who will suffer from poor refereeing decisions, is that you cannot let it matter, because you cannot do anything about it.

And FIFA will surely do nothing to help. It never has.


Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing, and an avid sports fan. He is also the author of the popular CNET blog Technically Incorrect.

See also:

Full Coverage: World Cup

Pictures: Opening rounds of the World Cup

Slovenia Small Guys Teach U.S. a Big Lesson

South Africa Falls to a Tragedy of Errors

Swiss Make Melted Cheese Out of Spain

North Korea Spooks Brazil

Paraguay Tries to Be Italy, Almost Beats Italy

World Cup: Germany and Ghana Buzz the U.S. team

World Cup: U.S. Lets England Put Egg on Its Own Face

South Africa Shows the World How Soccer Is Celebrated

Guess Who Will Win the World Cup


  • Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by refgo June 23, 2010 9:39 AM EDT
So this referee (Koman Coulibaly) totally blew this call, there is no doubt about that. But, the players made mistakes that had they not made, would have given them a victory. The point here is that the game is played by human beings and is refereed by them as well.

Over all, the referees have done an amazing job. TV commentators have made remarks about calls only to have replays show the refs were right all along. It is one of the biggest problems with the British announcers doing the American broadcasts. The English and Scottish announcers have a deep history of questioning calls to a point where the FA (the English governing body for soccer) has had to run an advertising campaign to respect the referees.

Consider the first game where the announcers kept going back to an offsides call repeating that there was a defender on the goal line so the play couldn't be offsides. They couldn't have been any more wrong, but did they make a public apology? No, they muttered a comment about how the call was right after all and nothing more than that. They couldn't count to 2, even with the help of repeated replays yet the assistant referee got it right in a split second.

Lets fast forward to Monday's game Chile/Swiss game when Valon Behrami was given a red card for an elbow. The replays show he did it to one defender and got a way with it, then did it again only two steps further down field to a second defender. The call was right on and made in real time, yet the announcers still questioned it, even after the replay.

Again, yesterday, the announcers questioned the red card in the box to France's Yoann Gourcuff who not only led with his forearm and made contact with an elbow to the face, he jumped at his opponent, not up for the ball, both fouls. US Soccer issued a paper on this in February 2009 and the foul by Gourcuff was a verbatim visual translation of that paper. "Does the player lead with the forearm and/or elbow as he jumps at or toward the opponent instead of straight up? An arm extended from the jumper?s body is like a battering ram (solid, hard and unforgiving). Think ?up and in? toward the opponent...After considering these factors, if the referee believes the safety of the opponent is endangered or would have been endangered, then a red card is mandated", the paper states. Yet the announcers still failed to recognize the severity of the foul and the justification for the card.

Could it actually be that the refs know what they are doing? Not only are they getting it right, they are doing it in real time, split second decisions, while the superior British TV announcers with the added bonus of instant replays still can't make the call and only make it harder for every referee n every sport to deal with coaches and parents on the sidelines.

Lastly, if FIFA were to make referees answer to the press about their calls, they would be hesitant to make calls on the field in fear of the hoard of reporters looking for a flaw (I'm not only a referee, I'm working member of the press). This would certainly have an affect on the referee's ability to make that instant decision which, as this World Cup is showing is more often right than wrong, while only providing a chance that they might not make the few mistake that they do make.

Soccer referees at ALL levels face constant review and evaluation. In order to move past the introductory grade of referee they must be assessed in a 90 minute game situation that provides enough challenge to show the referee's ability. As they move on through the amateur ranks, they must be assessed annually to maintain their ranking and since they have advanced, they are more likely to be at game where they are reviewed beyond that annual assessment.It takes multiple assessments to make it to the pro ranks. At the professional level, each game is reviewed with an assessor after the game and the referee learns what they did right and what they did wrong and their ability to get more games at that level is based on those reviews. This is as it should be, the governing body for the sport should make the call, not the media nor the fans.
Reply to this comment
by sasa699 June 21, 2010 9:02 AM EDT
Hello,everybody,the good shoping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let's facelift bar!
===== http://www.fashionclothe.com ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

UGG BOOT $50

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33

Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12

New era cap $9

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18

FREE SHIPPING
Reply to this comment
by mylilelar June 20, 2010 6:40 PM EDT
It's a crooked sport as the 3rd world counties that adhere to this nonsense can attest to. It is no wonder it is not coveted in the United States like these 3rd world slum holes. It's not a good game. It is iffy at best. It IS...the ugly game. OUT
Reply to this comment
by pragmatist1 June 19, 2010 7:27 PM EDT
No matter the game, sports has many incompetent officials who can't handle a close call; they make their calls based on preconceived notions of outcome. That's the flaw with the human element.
Reply to this comment
by jscottelwood-2009 June 19, 2010 7:20 PM EDT
I'll bet he works for BP during the off season.
Reply to this comment
by effjay4 June 19, 2010 6:39 PM EDT
FIFA is a joke. The refs must explain themselves or anyone could buy them out. If thats what it is, soccer or football as it is, is just a sham.
Reply to this comment
by DocD--2008 June 19, 2010 5:46 PM EDT
Simply put, FIFA needs to be dismantled and forgotten and the ***** that sit on it never heard from again.
Reply to this comment
by LIBERALS-lie June 19, 2010 5:32 PM EDT
Blame Bush ?
Reply to this comment
by Lawyers-Guns-n-Money06 June 19, 2010 5:08 PM EDT
by ToolMangler1 June 19, 2010 4:45 PM EDT
Now we shouldn't be upset with this judge, He is only doing what he was "PAID" to do, (insure a US loss)
================================================================

Meh. You should have seen the match between Germany and Serbia. The ref in that game had a serious case of yellow fever as he was handing out cards like birthday party invites.

Germany was a man down for almost 60 minutes of their game and the ref missed a blatant handball that could have been an equalizer for Germany.

To be fair, the ref was handing out cards to both teams with impunity. But unlike other sports, when you get booked in soccer, it has ramifications in future games. If all the refs performed equally well or equally $h!^^y, it wouldn't be much of a factor. But when you have a few rogue refs in a high profile tourney, it throws the whole thing off kilter.
Reply to this comment
by 6591Hou June 19, 2010 4:39 PM EDT
Anyone reminded of the Olympic scoring fiascos of the Soviet Union heyday? Communist country judges making absurd calls was too well known - so what's the difference? Unfair referees are a fact of life, move along - nothing to report here.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 June 19, 2010 4:45 PM EDT
Now we shouldn't be upset with this judge, He is only doing what he was "PAID" to do, (insure a US loss)
See all 24 Comments
.

Follow Sports Blog

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook