The hearse carrying the body of singer Whitney Houston leaves the Whigham Funeral Home on Feb. 18, 2012 in Newark, N.J., en route to a private funeral at the New Hope Baptist Church.
/ Getty ImagesThe cover image sits alongside the caption: "Whitney: The Last Photo! Inside Her Private Viewing."
Complete Coverage: Death of a pop divaIt's a bold move even for the Enquirer, especially considering the tight constraints Houston's family put on the media during the late singer's wake and funeral. Several media outlets have since re-posted the magazine shot online.
The photo was reportedly taken at the Whigham Funeral Home in New Jersey. It's unclear how the Enquirer obtained the still-unverified shot.
In the image, Houston is seen in a purple dress with a brooch pinned to her chest. According to the Enquirer headline, the singer was buried wearing $500,000 worth of jewelry with gold slippers on her feet.
Since its publication on Wednesday, the photo has ignited an outrage against the tabloid on Facebook and Twitter.
In response to the reaction, publisher Mary Beth Wright told FoxNews.com, "I thought it was beautiful," referring to the photo.
Still, it's not the first time the Enquirer has shocked readers. In 1977, it published a picture of Elvis Presley in his casket. Three years later, the magazine followed suit after John Lennon's assassination.
Houston was laid to rest on Saturday in her hometown of Newark, N.J. -- a week after she was found dead in her hotel room at the Beverly Hilton. She was 48.
Tell us: Do you think the National Enquirer crossed the line?
That it is understandable for many fans to want to see the performers in repose as their final chance to say good bye to one of the lifetime Icons.
Tho it may seem somewhat heartless, I bet that even some of those criticizing the photo have gone out and bought a copy to always remember an American Princess laid to her eternal sleep.
Who won't miss the music that was and might have been to come we have lost a light and it is ok to hurt, to mourn and to want to have a final picture of good bye.
I speak from personal experience. When my dad passed away a few years ago I foolishly agreed to allow a person to take photos of my dad in his casket. I thought there would be no harm done and that "everyone grieves in their own way." The problem wasn't in the fact that she took the pictures - it was that she had them on her computer and on more than one occasion the photo was mistakenly plastered across her screen. The shock isn't from the image itself but from what the image represents. That was the hardest time in my life and I'm not sure I could ever be able to explain the feelings loss/heartbreak/abandonment/pain that I felt.
My point is that NOBODY should get the right to force you to relive the period of time. Now Whitney's family can't even go to the grocery store without this constant reminder of the pain of losing someone.
I suppose some people might not ever be able to understand that feeling - not unless you've lost a parent - but it's that actual FEELING that makes this photo a disgrace.
I wonder how the photographer of such a despicable photo sleeps at night?