Celebrity Circuit
CBS/AP/ October 28, 2011, 10:49 AM

Commonwealth nations change royal succession rules

cbs wedding. William, Kate

Britain's Prince William and his wife, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, stand outside of Westminster Abbey following their wedding in London on Friday, April, 29, 2011.

/ AP

(CBS/AP) PERTH, Australia - The 16 Commonwealth countries for which Queen Elizabeth II is monarch agreed Friday that girls are to be given equal rights as boys in the order of succession to the throne.

The change means that if Prince William and Kate's first child is a daughter, she will take precedence over any younger brothers in line for the throne.

Pictures: Prince William and Kate
Pictures: Britain's line of succession
Special section: The royal wedding

Announcing the proposed changes, British Prime Minister David Cameron said, according to the Daily Mail: "Put simply, if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were to have a little girl, that girl would one day be our queen."

Commonwealth national leaders also agreed at a summit in the western Australian city of Perth to lift a ban on monarchs marrying Roman Catholics, Cameron said.

Any one of the former British colonies could have vetoed the changes to the centuries-old rules that ensure that a male heir takes the throne ahead of older sisters.

"Attitudes have changed fundamentally over the centuries and some of the outdated rules - like some of the rules of succession - just don't make sense to us any more," Cameron told reporters in Perth.

"The idea that a younger son should become monarch instead of an elder daughter simply because he is a man, or that a future monarch can marry someone of any faith except a Catholic - this way of thinking is at odds with the modern countries that we have become," he added.

Cameron made the announcement on the first day of a biennial meeting of 53 Commonwealth leaders.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Australia's first female leader and chairwoman of the summit, welcomed the decision.

"These things seem straightforward, but just because they seem straightforward to our modern minds doesn't mean we should underestimate their historic significance," Gillard told reporters.

Elizabeth II is head of state of Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Jamaica, Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Grenada, Belize, St. Christopher and Nevis, St. Lucia, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Papua New Guinea.

She opened the meeting of leaders representing 30 percent of the world's population on Friday by vowing to bring needed relevancy to the Commonwealth in a time of global uncertainty and insecurity.

The queen cited financial concerns, food supply insecurity and climate change among key issues she expected the forum to tackle.

"This Commonwealth meeting is, for its part, the perfect opportunity to address these issues and find responses for today's crises and challenges," she said in her opening address.

The queen also said the meeting would bring "new vibrancy" to the Commonwealth forum, which will be forced to defend itself against accusations of irrelevancy. A scathing report questioning its effectiveness will be presented to Commonwealth leaders during the summit.

Britain's government began the process of reviewing the rules of royal succession so that if Prince William's first child is a girl, she would eventually become queen. The review started before William married commoner Kate Middleton in April. She is now formally known as Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.

William is second in line to the throne after his father, Prince Charles, who is the queen's first-born child. Charles' sister Anne is lower in the line of succession than her younger brothers Andrew and Edward. Charles, in turn, had only sons, William and Harry.

Elizabeth II succeeded her father, King George VI, because he had no sons. If she had had a brother, however much younger he was, he would have jumped above her in the line of succession.

The thorny issue of the succession has been an on-and-off topic in Britain, but has never been resolved. In 2009, then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown's government considered a bill that would end the custom of putting males ahead of females in the succession line, as well as lift a ban on British monarchs marrying Roman Catholics. The government did not have time to pursue it before Brown's term ended.

The rule has excluded women from succeeding to the throne in the past. Queen Victoria's first child was a daughter - also called Victoria - but it was her younger brother who succeeded to the throne, as King Edward VII.

Buckingham Palace has always refrained from commenting on the political issue, saying it's a matter for the government to decide.

37 Photos

Prince William and Kate

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
10 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Richard998_ says:
Feminism is about "equal rights" for women that in reality give women prohibitive advantages over men. In this case, women live much longer lives than men, so "equal" claims for girls means a female-dominated monarchy. In the 21st century there have been no kings of England. In the 20th century, a queen reigned for more years than all of the kings combined. The same was true in the 19th century. In other words, even under rules that "favoured" men, women still occupied the throne for longer periods during the last two centuries.Why tilt the scales even more in favour of women?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
barbaram99 says:
HM has done the right thing..The Queen has never disgraced herself or her Nation.I think that saids alot..
I was 19 when Nixon resigned..I watched it live on TV. I could not belive it..A President resigning..It was history all right..
The Brits are right..
The fact that the Queen has made it so--I am sure HRH Chares will be King..The line should be first born-what was sad was the girls were passed up if her brother was younger than her -he was/is the first male..It seemed unfair..
The Queen is a vet..
We have not ever had a woman President..All males..
To set the record right--the founding fathers were British subjucts even tho they were born in America.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
Nooooooo

Who cares.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SUZAMBA says:
There comes a time when one must change with the times, and this must be it. I'm not much for the King and Queen thing, but hey, I don't care for our pres. either. So WE.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jenna1955 says:
I hope Will and Kate have a future QUEEN!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
it's a great decision, women have proven their capacity in all fields, including leadership

"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OnTheCrown says:
Good thing Princess Margaret wasn't a man.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
The royalty thing is stupid but this looks like a good decision.
reply
pleiadies1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Funnily enough we think your interminable and costly Presidential elections are stupid, too. At least the Queen has never publicly disgraced herself or brought Britian into disrepute, which is more than can be said of Nixon and Clinton for starters.
Jaylah54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pleiadies1, funnily enough, a lot of Americans think our interminable and costly Presidential elections are stupid, too.