Celebrity Circuit
By

Jessica Derschowitz /

CBS News/ March 30, 2011, 9:44 AM

Mila Kunis defends Natalie Portman's "Black Swan" dancing

Mila Kunis, left, and Natalie Portman arrive at the "Black Swan" closing night gala during AFI FEST 2010 on Nov. 11, 2010, in Hollywood, Calif.

/ Getty

(CBS) Mila Kunis is speaking out in favor of her "Black Swan" costar Natalie Portman, amid accusations that the Oscar-winner's dance double did the majority of the dancing in the film.

Portman's double, American Ballet Theatre soloist Sarah Lane, claims that the actress only did five percent of the dancing shown on screen.

Pictures: Natalie Portman
Pictures: Mila Kunis
Pictures: "Black Swan"

"Natalie danced her a-- off," Kunis told Entertainment Weekly on Monday. "I think it's unfortunate that this is coming out and taking attention away from [the praise] Natalie deserved and got."

Kunis said that Portman has been honest about what dancing she did and did not do in the film.

"She'll tell you [that], no, she was not on pointe when she did a fouette [turn]. No one's going to deny that. But she did do every ounce of every one of her dances," she said. "[Lane] wasn't used for everything. It was more like a safety net. If Nat wasn't able to do something, you'd have a safety net. The same thing that I had - I had a double as a safety net. We all did. No one ever denied it."

Portman won the Academy Award for best actress last month for her role in "Black Swan." The film's choreographer, Benjamin Millepied (who is also Portman's fiance), insisted in a recent Los Angeles Times interview that she did 85 percent of the dancing shown in the film.

33 Photos

Mila Kunis named Esquire's "Sexiest Woman Alive"

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ericam123456 says:
I think we all forget that Natalie Portman is an actress! She is not a dancer, and she learned how to dance for this role. So what she didnt dance 90% of the time? and who is to say she didn't? this dancer is probably just saying all of this to get some attention. If you base the movie just strictly on acting Natalie still deserved the Oscar and every other award she got for the movie. She was amazing and even if she did only 5 or 10 or whatever percent of the dancing that's still amazing for someone who inst a ballerina to lean ballet at 29 years old! I loved the movie and I personally don't think any actress could of done a better job them Natalie!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
werntrouble says:
For heaven's sake, can't we expend our mental energy on something that could in the slightest way help a world that is mired in the tragedies of earthquakes & tsunamis, tyrannical dictators, greedy oil barons, starving children, widespread ignorance and even domestic poverty. With this perpective, I, for one, couldn't give a damn who danced or sang or pranced and spoke. It's only Hollywood, it's make-believe! GET A LIFE!!!
reply
Stardust1973CM replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you could care less, why are you reading and responding to this. Dolt.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
voxpopulus says:
"Dance double for Natalie Portman - Sarah Lane"

That's how easy it is to give credit where credit is due. This movie's credits even acknowledged the guy who told them where to park the cars. Instead they called her a "hand model", tried to wipe from existence a web video that showed how Portman's head was placed on Lane's body, and told her not to talk about this before the Oscars.

The shots in which Lane danced are the full body shots you actually remember from the film, including the actual final dance sequence and transformation scene and that rehearsal room scene with the choreographer and the mirror.

Portman's ballet instructor noted she had never even danced en pointe when the rehearsals began, although she did, a little, in the film. Most of Portman's work was the upper body work. Yes, that accounts for 80%. It doesn't actually account for the full body dancing.

Anyone who thinks that lessons as a kid plus six months of catch up makes you a ballerina knows nothing about the art of ballet. To anyone who does it is 100% obvious which shots use a professional dancer. It took 22 years of daily eight hour or more slog for Sarah Lane to get as good as she is (good enough to make the cover od Dance magazine and take lead roles), as it does for any prima ballerina.

You don't have to insult one art form in making another. Aronofsky shows a distinct lack of ethics.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rcindallas says:
MEG!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ecibu33 says:
What is the big deal??? Whay cant Natalie accept she did/can not dance and why cant Sarah accept cannot act? Each one has their strong points and thats that... Natalie deserved the award for her acting not dancing... If Natalie thinks she is a great dance and Sarah thinks she is a great actress, then we have a problem here - an ego problem (unfortunately, that problem is all too common in this world of ours).. Nobody is comfortable as they are. The Mastercard ad always comes to my mind: "Being comfotable with who you are ... priceless".
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mnbrant says:
Wow that was a great movie. It was about a ghetto type ballerina who was also psychotic. Even if you don't like ballet you can go for the crazy. Everybody should go see it. Its at the dollar theatres now.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Henri_Rochard says:
Kunis didn't actually deny that Sarah Lane did the vast majority of Portman's dancing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rainbowroosie says:
DUH --- star does movie and stunt double does the stunts??? Body double, dance double, fight the alien double, who cares?? What's the big story here???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thesevenveils says:
Natalie Portman can't dance. Sure she took gobs of lessons, but lessons don't make a Ballerina. Just ask the thousands of teenage girls who gave up ballet after practicing it for 10 or so years because they lacked the grace and stamina.

Natalie Portman can barely stand on her tiptoes long enough to reach her cheerios on the second shelf of a cupboard, much less ballon petite all?gro across the stage. All her lying is just making it worse for her. She may be an okay actress but she is a lousy liar.
reply
wlhoppers replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So you saw her practicing? Watched her all those hours? You've seen her reach for her cheerios in her own kitchen. Wow! How many other celebrities do you know that well? Do tell...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you_MAY_be_right says:
BIG F'N DEAL!

Those awards are nothing more than a bunch of rich actors (esses0 patting each other on the back so that the next time they "demand" $5 or $6 Mil to do a movie than can get it.

In the big scheme of things and what is happening in the world today this argument isn't a drop in the sea of life.
reply
See all 12 Comments