December 7, 2011 1:44 PM

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations

By
Sharyl Attkisson
Topics
News ,
Law and Order
Guns recovered by ATF Agents (Credit: CBS)

Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation "Fast and Furious" to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales.

PICTURES: ATF "Gunwalking" scandal timeline

In Fast and Furious, ATF secretly encouraged gun dealers to sell to suspected traffickers for Mexican drug cartels to go after the "big fish." But ATF whistleblowers told CBS News and Congress it was a dangerous practice called "gunwalking," and it put thousands of weapons on the street. Many were used in violent crimes in Mexico. Two were found at the murder scene of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

ATF officials didn't intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called "Demand Letter 3". That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or "long guns." Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF's Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

"Bill - can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks." 

More Fast and Furious coverage:
Memos contradict Holder on Fast and Furious
Agent: I was ordered to let guns "walk" into Mexico
Gunwalking scandal uncovered at ATF

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as "(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue." And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell: "Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case." 

This revelation angers gun rights advocates. Larry Keane, a spokesman for National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry trade group, calls the discussion of Fast and Furious to argue for Demand Letter 3 "disappointing and ironic." Keane says it's "deeply troubling" if sales made by gun dealers "voluntarily cooperating with ATF's flawed 'Operation Fast & Furious' were going to be used by some individuals within ATF to justify imposing a multiple sales reporting requirement for rifles."

The Gun Dealers' Quandary

Several gun dealers who cooperated with ATF told CBS News and Congressional investigators they only went through with suspicious sales because ATF asked them to.

Sometimes it was against the gun dealer's own best judgment.

Read the email

In April, 2010 a licensed gun dealer cooperating with ATF was increasingly concerned about selling so many guns. "We just want to make sure we are cooperating with ATF and that we are not viewed as selling to the bad guys," writes the gun dealer to ATF Phoenix officials, "(W)e were hoping to put together something like a letter of understanding to alleviate concerns of some type of recourse against us down the road for selling these items."

Read the email

ATF's group supervisor on Fast and Furious David Voth assures the gun dealer there's nothing to worry about. "We (ATF) are continually monitoring these suspects using a variety of investigative techniques which I cannot go into detail."

Two months later, the same gun dealer grew more agitated.

"I wanted to make sure that none of the firearms that were sold per our conversation with you and various ATF agents could or would ever end up south of the border or in the hands of the bad guys. I guess I am looking for a bit of reassurance that the guns are not getting south or in the wrong hands...I want to help ATF with its investigation but not at the risk of agents (sic) safety because I have some very close friends that are US Border Patrol agents in southern AZ as well as my concern for all the agents (sic) safety that protect our country." 

"It's like ATF created or added to the problem so they could be the solution to it and pat themselves on the back," says one law enforcement source familiar with the facts. "It's a circular way of thinking."

The Justice Department and ATF declined to comment. ATF officials mentioned in this report did not respond to requests from CBS News to speak with them.

The "Demand Letter 3" Debate

The two sides in the gun debate have long clashed over whether gun dealers should have to report multiple rifle sales. On one side, ATF officials argue that a large number of semi-automatic, high-caliber rifles from the U.S. are being used by violent cartels in Mexico. They believe more reporting requirements would help ATF crack down. On the other side, gun rights advocates say that's unconstitutional, and would not make a difference in Mexican cartel crimes.

Two earlier Demand Letters were initiated in 2000 and affected a relatively small number of gun shops. Demand Letter 3 was to be much more sweeping, affecting 8,500 firearms dealers in four southwest border states: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. ATF chose those states because they "have a significant number of crime guns traced back to them from Mexico." The reporting requirements were to apply if a gun dealer sells two or more long guns to a single person within five business days, and only if the guns are semi-automatic, greater than .22 caliber and can be fitted with a detachable magazine.

On April 25, 2011, ATF announced plans to implement Demand Letter 3. The National Shooting Sports Foundation is suing the ATF to stop the new rules. It calls the regulation an illegal attempt to enforce a law Congress never passed. ATF counters that it has reasonably targeted guns used most often to "commit violent crimes in Mexico, especially by drug gangs."

Reaction

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, is investigating Fast and Furious, as well as the alleged use of the case to advance gun regulations. "There's plenty of evidence showing that this administration planned to use the tragedies of Fast and Furious as rationale to further their goals of a long gun reporting requirement. But, we've learned from our investigation that reporting multiple long gun sales would do nothing to stop the flow of firearms to known straw purchasers because many Federal Firearms Dealers are already voluntarily reporting suspicious transactions. It's pretty clear that the problem isn't lack of burdensome reporting requirements."

On July 12, 2011, Sen. Grassley and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., wrote Attorney General Eric Holder, whose Justice Department oversees ATF. They asked Holder whether officials in his agency discussed how "Fast and Furious could be used to justify additional regulatory authorities." So far, they have not received a response. CBS News asked the Justice Department for comment and context on ATF emails about Fast and Furious and Demand Letter 3, but officials declined to speak with us.

"In light of the evidence, the Justice Department's refusal to answer questions about the role Operation Fast and Furious was supposed to play in advancing new firearms regulations is simply unacceptable," Rep. Issa told CBS News.


  • Sharyl Attkisson

    Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News investigative correspondent based in Washington. All of her stories, videos and blogs are available here.

Add a Comment See all 326 Comments
by Pieareround February 10, 2012 11:03 AM EST
You act like you discovered this. The magazine 'American Rifleman' reported this a month after it was revealed and long before your resulting snub by Obo and Co. Isn't electronic reporting supposed to beat out printed magazines? Fox News was also on it months before CBS. At that time the claimants were summarily dismissed as being biased and paranoid by CBS and most other reporting agencies. Apparently you noticed that where there's smoke, there's fire. Nice to have you on the bandwagon but where were you earlier when the accusations of Holder committing treason and acts of war was inconceivable and unpopular? Welcome to the party.
Reply to this comment
by Ekim_55 December 25, 2011 9:07 PM EST
The cat is out of the bag. Just a matter of how many cats will be chunked under the bus.
Reply to this comment
by MontanaLibertarian December 25, 2011 12:37 PM EST
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Sharyl Attkisson for offering us an excellent example of solid, professional journalism. She has dug deeply, written clearly and concisely, stated the matter factually and provided good context.

I believe CBS should put this series forward for a Pulitzer.
Reply to this comment
by Stopthefreeride December 20, 2011 2:54 PM EST
This is the most irresponsible and idiotic debacle yet. To risk these weapons falling into the hands of criminals for any reason is absurd. It is ludicrous for those to deny responsibility stating that they did not know what was going on. It happened on your watch by employees of agencies who report to you, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to know what is going on in your organization. The anti-gunners have made it a point to further their cause by trying say that American guns are going to Mexican cartels. Little did we know that it is the anti-gunners themselves who are insuring the cartels get the weapons. So the anti-gunners want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, leaving them defenseless against criminals who the anti-gunners supply with guns. Very Scary for America.
Reply to this comment
by TwoPartyConspiracy December 14, 2011 10:43 PM EST
The Republicans in the house will not start down the road to impeachment, because as their votes on the appropriations bill (with wholly unconstitutional indefinite detention provisions) shows they are all fake conservatives who are actually on O'bama's side. There opposition to him is a game. They have been paid to keep him safely tucked into the White House for four more years. He's the bogeyman that all but ensures their own re-election for at least 4 more years. Republicans in Congress pretend to be against gun control knowing their banksters pals can just take guns via the martial law that will be imposed after the FBI stirs up and sponsors another 'domestic terrorism' incident.
Reply to this comment
by moretruthnow December 15, 2011 8:35 PM EST
Nothing could be further from the truth. The GOP wants power, control and the ability to give, give and give to their beloved wealthy corporate big shots who fund them. The ATF should never have been doing this horrid and despicable type of gun sales. We do need sensible gun ownership and whatever laws to go with that. These Congressional republicans are real right wing wacko tea party republicans for the rich, against the middle class and 100 percent in the NRA's hip pocket. That is why I am very suspicious that the GOP in Arizona was well aware of this and were gleeful to see all the guns being sold.
by insulationversusenergy December 23, 2011 12:37 PM EST
Operation PatCon.
by malcolmkyle December 11, 2011 9:20 AM EST
Are you an international criminal? And are you wondering if it's wise to maintain your affiliation to any one of the estimated sixteen currently-active Mexican Drug Cartels? Maybe you should consider the following information very carefully:

As a gesture of good will vis-a-vis cross-border relations, key members of the American Federal Government have recently pledged a solemn oath, declaring their commitment to encouraging people like yourself to increase performance and productivity. In particular, the United States Department of Justice will guarantee that you achieve a respectable level of technology in both military grade weapons and equipment while actively facilitating the laundering of that swirling cascade of cash that a business like yours invariably and continually generates.

Still not convinced that during prohibition the phenomenal benefits of remaining an international drug criminal far outweigh the remotely possible, negative consequences? Here's another recent DOJ announcement, and this time written personally by their principal corporate attorney whose main priority is keeping himself out of jail:

"For nearly three years, I have been privileged to work closely with many of the most ruthless organizations to the south of our border. I am extremely proud of our record of abuse, fraud, waste, misconduct, and treason and I pledge a continuation of all such policies that will further weaken our national security and compromise all honest efforts of law enforcement."
- Attorney General Holder.

Some people, it appears, have absolutely no problem being simultaneously absurd, and very evil.
Reply to this comment
by reason1984 December 10, 2011 3:25 PM EST
Well if nothing else out of this horrible mess, Holder can at least claim the DOJ record for the senseless slaughter of innocent civilians. Attaboy Eric. Sorrry Janet R., you had a good run, keep your chin up.
Reply to this comment
by moretruthnow December 15, 2011 8:49 PM EST
Bush/Cheney can claim their record for senseless slaughter of thousands of innocent civilians and our thousands of our fine military men and women. I really don't think the GOP has a lot of concern for those poor Mexicans who are the victims of the most evil and wicked Mexican gangs.
by insulationversusenergy December 23, 2011 12:39 PM EST
Operation PatCon
by Dendez December 10, 2011 2:57 PM EST
How long does it take for the DOJ's Inspector General to determine who authorized these guns to walk? Doesn't seem to be a complicated question. Perhaps we'll hear from them after the election.
Here's my take ~ how difficult would it be to establish accountability for an illegal gun running scheme if it was designed from the beginning to specifically protect those responsible? These guys are pretty smart and it would be difficult to find the paper trail. So if the intent was to drum up support for more gun control laws, wouldn't this scheme's origination have to be undiscoverable? It would certainly have to leave Obama, Clinton, Holder, FBI, DEA, and Homeland Security in the clear.
The facts will have to come from putting the squeeze on those In-the-Know. We need to talk to these guys who have been "transferred" and find out what they know and who else knew about it. It is inconceivable to me that regional administrators would decide this was a plausible plan and implement it totally on their own. Not in the BATF.
This is not a post facto cover up. This has been planned from the get-go not to reveal those responsible. I just hope Issa fights like a pitbull until the truth be told. And then heads will roll.
Reply to this comment
by MontanaLibertarian December 25, 2011 2:44 PM EST
You are correct: it shouldn't take long at all to determine who authorized these crimes.

You go to one of the participants, read him his Miranda rights, advise him that other investigators are, at that moment, reading those same rights to at least four other participants. You indicate that one or two of those being interviewed, and no more, will be allowed to make a deal. That deal will involve your recommendation that cooperating witnesses will avoid long hard prison time, but not all prison time. It will also be conditioned on the witnesses providing good evidence and testimony against the others.

Some one among them will cave, and you'll unravel the tangle.

That would be a good, solid law enforcement approach to the situation. Unfortunately, this investigation is in the hands of the DOJ's Inspector General, a very far cry from a solid law enforcement officer, or even a minimally ethical lawyer.
by simpleconservative December 9, 2011 11:31 PM EST
More corruption from the most corrupt administration I have witnessed in my 5 decades of political awareness. When are impeachment suits going to be filed starting with Holder. This administration makes a sewer pipe look clean by comparison!
Reply to this comment
by moretruthnow December 15, 2011 8:53 PM EST
The most corrupt and evil administration was the Bush administration bar none. You are dreaming if you think republicans who worship the NRA are the least bit concerned about selling guns to Mexicans. It is President Obama who has concern to make sure that this type incident is cleared up. People have already been dealt with.
by insulationversusenergy December 23, 2011 12:41 PM EST
Google Operation PatCon.
by Jersey_Dave December 9, 2011 7:54 PM EST
Sarah Brady, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, Michael Bloomberg, Chuck Schumer, Rosie O'Donnell: Anyone wondering why they haven't said one word about this deliberate arming of criminals by agencies of our own government for the purpose of directly causing the harming and killing of people on both sides of the border? Yeah, maybe I shouldn't wonder either. I'll be sure to remember this next time they say they want to disarm innocent citizens. I also feel bad for the good BATFE agents and police from other agencies who tried to stop this and were overruled by the political bosses. Kudos to CBS for their honesty in pursuing a story wherever it goes, and I wish more reporters had this kind of guts and down the middle honesty to call it as it is right down the line.
Reply to this comment
See all 326 Comments
.

Follow CBS News Investigates

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook