AP/ March 19, 2013, 10:37 PM

Sanford advances to GOP runoff in House race in S.C.

Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford addresses supporters in Charleston, S.C., on Tuesday, March 19, 2013, after advancing to the GOP primary runoff in a race for a vacant South Carolina congressional seat.

Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford addresses supporters in Charleston, S.C., on Tuesday, March 19, 2013, after advancing to the GOP primary runoff in a race for a vacant South Carolina congressional seat. / AP Photo/Bruce Smith

Updated 10:37 PM ET

CHARLESTON, S.C. Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford advanced Tuesday to a runoff in the Republican contest for an open congressional seat along the state's southern coast, taking a step toward reviving a political career that was derailed by an extramarital affair while he was governor.

"Are you ready to change things in Washington?" Sanford, flanked by his four sons, asked a boisterous crowd at a restaurant in Charleston's historic district. "I'm incredibly humbled by the outpouring of support we have seen tonight."

Based on unofficial results with all precincts reporting on Tuesday evening, it was unclear who Sanford would face in the April 2 GOP runoff. But the eventual Republican candidate will square off against Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert. She won the Democratic primary for the seat, handily defeating perennial candidate Ben Frasier.

Tuesday was Sanford's first run for office since a 2009 scandal in which he acknowledged an affair. After disappearing and telling his staff he was out hiking the Appalachian Trail, he returned to the state to reveal that he was in Argentina with a woman he later become engaged to after divorcing his wife, Jenny. She briefly weighed a bid for the seat but decided against it.

In addition to Sanford, 15 other candidates were vying in the GOP primary.

Former Charleston County councilman Curtis Bostic held a slim lead over state Sen. Larry Grooms for second place. The margin was so narrow, less than one percent, that a recount would automatically be required. Teddy Turner, the son of media mogul Ted Turner, trailed Bostic and Grooms.

Sanford had about 37 percent of the vote.

Mark Sanford voted Tuesday and said it was "a treat and a blessing" to be back on the ballot.

The 1st Congressional District seat became vacant last year when Republican Gov. Nikki Haley appointed then-U.S. Rep. Tim Scott to the state's empty U.S. Senate seat.

Wearing a gray windbreaker, Sanford walked alone up the street and up a flight of stairs to the building with the polling place in Charleston's historic district. He represented the district in Congress from 1994 to 2000, before he was elected governor.

"Casting your vote wasn't that hard," he laughed, but then added "it's a very significant race for me in a lot of different ways."

Sanford said after voting that life can be a series of course corrections.

"We all hope for a second chance. I believe in a God of second chances," Sanford said. "On a professional level, we have had a couple of months to talk about the issues. In that regard it has been a treat and a blessing."

Sanford, who spent months apologizing to groups around the state after he revealed his affair, said when he announced for his old congressional seat that the apology tour was over. Known for his frugality as both a congressman and governor, he has been spending the campaign talking about getting the nation's fiscal house in order.

With Sanford's campaign war chest and name recognition, Tuesday's race was largely for second place. With so many candidates, an April 2 GOP runoff was virtually assured.

Minutes before Sanford voted, state Rep. Chip Limehouse cast his ballot at the same polling place. Limehouse, who has spent almost $500,000 on the race, said he was sure Sanford would make the runoff and hoped he would be in second place.

"Purely by name ID, the governor has an advantage going into today. I'm not sure that goes past today," he said.

Turner was optimistic after voting at an armory in nearby Mount Pleasant.

"This race has been exciting all along because we started at zero," said Turner, making his first run for political office. "We have made our way as high as you can go in this race because you're not going to pass Sanford in the primary."

For Colbert Busch, the race was the fulfillment of a dream she has had since a young child.

"What an incredible opportunity. God bless America that we can do this," she said earlier Tuesday, adding that if she won, she would have two weeks to concentrate on the campaign while the Republicans in the runoff battle each other. "That is a real advantage."

Turnout was low, as expected in a special primary.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
22 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wolfmagic2012 says:
When you elect "Laughing Stock" candidates like Sanford, it makes your state a Laughing Stock.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KPeters_from_UK says:
RAYMAILHOT replies:Since the democrats have only 2/3rds of the power they can't get a budget together? This blame game is getting old!


Currently there are 53 Democrats and 45 Republicans in the Senate.

2/3 of 100 would be 66 Democrats just in the Senate alone.

Where did you get 2/3 from?


Next question is 53 enough to override the Republicans?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MerrellOBrian64 says:
I truly hope these hicks realize that being "so concerned" about where my dick goes as a gay man and giving this Adulterous Liar a pass is showing the whole world how much there is no value, no meaning and total hypocrisy to their "Chrisitan Family Values".
These low-educated voters and eduated haters have always had a double standard for everyone but their tribes. First it was segregation based on color and now it's based on money and preference towards liars and frauds, just so long as they repeat the pledge: "I hate Obama. I hate all black people. I hate all gay people." South Carolina, you're subject to Federal Law, too. You WILL have Equal Marriage this year whether you like it or not!! So much for you "Jesus" crap when you'll get in bed with this fool.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lloydbest1 says:
Mr. Sanford's private life is his own. What he does off the clock is his business however questionably ethical that may be. I have seen pictures of Ms. Belen Chapur and if I were single and on the make, I'd chase her myself. Diddling her wasn't the problem as far as I was concerned.
What bothered me more than the affair was his billing the taxpayers of South Carolina for his pleasure cruise. It was the fact he told his staff he was going off to do one thing (hiking the Appalachian Trail) when, in fact, he was off doing something entirely different 6000 miles away (romping his mistress all over Buenos Aires). In addition to unethical, it was also inconsiderate. What would have happened had he disappeared? It could have happened. Suppose he were to have innocently fallen in with a very bad crowd and was robbed, stripped and left for dead? How would anybody be able to account for him or, for that matter, aid him?
A public servant owes it to his constituents to appraise them of his/her TRUE whereabouts if he(she) isn't available to be reached immediately. Marky-Mark didn't do that.
Quite apart from an ideology that would be more at home in pre-war Germany or Czarist Russia, Mark Sanford's demonstrated lack of dependability would make him a very risky choice to represent the state.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lindag20 says:
So the "family values" party (GOP) wants this creep back in political office. He had NO problem abandoning his job to play with his mistress and no one on his staff had any idea where he was. Why do the people of South Carolina expect him to act differently this time around??
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
omnibus66 says:
South Carolina, the palmetto state. Isn't a palmetto bug some kind of roach?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Martha12345 says:
Not this guy ! Find the village drunk or idiot, but this crooked cheater. Are the new Republicans just like the old Democrats ?
reply
keote_poet replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No..the new republicans are just like the old republicans...drunks, racist, cheaters, pedophiles....
linkicon reporticon emailicon
twmat311 says:
Are these people that dumb, or is the opposition that much worse?

This sends a message to all other crooked politicians at all levels that the electorate can be had for a wink and a promise. If you bring home the pork, that only cements the deal.
reply
twmat311 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Our state is just as corrupt. A state senator is in jail for misuse of funds, and a major local park still was prominently named for him. Only when additional charges were filed against him (separate crimes were committed) did the town DEBATE whether or not the park name should be changed!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
raymailhot says:
These personality type politicians are not good for the country. Yes, they get elected, but are a bad example of substance!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileycccc says:
Please South Carolina, don't add to the obstruction in Washington. It time to send a democrat to the nation's capital so American can get on with the business of America.
reply
raymailhot replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Since the democrats have only 2/3rds of the power they can't get a budget together? This blame game is getting old!
KPeters_from_UK replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Currently there are 53 Democrats and 45 Republicans in the Senate.

2/3 of 100 would be 66 Democrats just in the Senate alone.

Where did you get 2/3 from?
See all 22 Comments