
Activists sit in front of the U.S. Capitol during an anti-war rally January 27, 2006 in Washington, D.C. / Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images
Poll analysis by Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Anthony Salvanto and Fred Backus
Today marks 10 years since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and most Americans now say the U.S. should have avoided that conflict. Many Americans do not think the U.S. was successful in achieving its objectives there.
Looking back, 54 percent of Americans think the U.S. should have stayed out of Iraq, but 38 percent say taking military action against that country was the right thing to do.
Support for military engagement in Iraq was high after the initial invasion in the spring of 2003 (69 percent backed it), and it remained high through late that year when Saddam Hussein was captured. But in April 2004, in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and mounting U.S. casualties, support for U.S. involvement in Iraq dipped below 50 percent for the first time.
By early 2006, most Americans - 54 percent - said the U.S. should have stayed out of Iraq; since then, a majority has continued to hold that view. The last U.S. troops left Iraq in December 2011.
Republicans and Democrats assess America's nearly nine-year involvement in Iraq differently: most Republicans (61 percent) say invading Iraq was the right thing to do, while Democrats (and independents) disagree.
Many Americans express skepticism about whether the mission in Iraq was successful. Four in ten think the U.S. succeeded in accomplishing its objectives, but more (50 percent) say it did not.
A majority - 56 percent - of Democrats don't think the U.S. successfully accomplished its goals in Iraq, and while most Republicans think invading Iraq was the right thing to do, they are divided (46-45 percent) on whether the U.S. ultimately succeeded there.
________________________________________________________
This poll was conducted by telephone from March 1-3, 2013 among 861 adults nationwide. Phone numbers were dialed from samples of both standard land-line and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups may be higher. This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.
From an anti-war demonstrator to all of ye: Kiss my ass! Learn for your mistakes and never question a liberal ever again because (and you'll just have to accept this fact!) WE'RE SMARTER THAN YOU!
oil concerns, Bush was to stupid. What a waste of a good heart!
You can certainly get the desired results by stopping polling when you achieve the end game you wanted before you started calling.
Spare us, please.
All we have to do is look at the facts and history of the neocon's obsession with war with Iraq, which predates the 9/11 attacks by decades.
And now, folks, it's the GOP who want us to send troops to Syria. I'm certain there won't be one young man or woman from their families or the families of the owners of Exxon/Mobil or any of the major military contractors volunteering to serve.
We've seen this before. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different outcome.
I am disgusted that there are still people blinded and stupid enough to defend the cowardly criminal actions of the pathetic subhumans who did this. I am proud to say that I was never fooled and was out on the streets protesting this before it even started.
The world court at the Hague should be the venue. Absent accountability what is the point? Republicans still claim invading Iraq was the right thing to do. This is what you get when you elect republicans the party of war.
They ware their lapel pins, but plot against American's every day.
One more thing: Saddam Hussein had n o t h i n g t o d o w i t h t h e e v e n t s o f 9/11/2001!