On verge of budget fight, Obama visits Congress

President Obama speaks as House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., look on during a meeting with bipartisan group of congressional leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on November 16, 2012 in Washington, D.C. / Olivier Douliery / Pool / Getty Images
President Obama is headed to the Capitol today to meet with Senate Democrats - the first of three consecutive trips for Mr. Obama to the Hill over three days as he continues his outreach to Congress.
His visit comes as Washington girds for weeks of warfare over the budget for next year and beyond as both House and Senate Budget Committees this week take up blueprints for the upcoming 2014 budget year.
The first salvo in that battle is coming from House Republicans poised to release on Tuesday a now-familiar budget featuring gestures to block Obamacare, turn Medicare into a voucher-like program for future retirees and sharply curb Medicaid and domestic agency budgets. Such ideas are dead on arrival with Obama and Democrats controlling the Senate, but will - in concert with new taxes on the wealthy enacted in January - allow Republicans to propose a budget that would come to balance within 10 years.
"We think we owe the American people a balanced budget," House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said on "Fox News Sunday."
Senate Democrats are countering on Wednesday with a budget plan mixing tax increases, cuts to the Pentagon and relatively modest cuts to domestic programs. The measure would not reach balance, but it would undo automatic budget cuts that started taking effect this month and largely leaves alone rapidly growing benefit programs like Medicare.
Mr. Obama's own budget has been delayed repeatedly this year, and it is not clear if he intends to release it before the House and Senate hold their debates this month.
"It's being worked on," White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday. "We are obviously watching Congress for budget proposals that will be put forward in both houses, and we will work with Congress in these conversations."
Can Obama and the GOP work together?
Obama "charm offensive" could be good sign for budget
The upcoming debate over the long-term budgetary future promises to be stoutly partisan, even as Mr. Obama is undertaking outreach to rank-and-file Republicans in hopes of sowing the seeds for a bipartisan "grand bargain" on the budget this year after two failed attempts to strike agreement with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. In addition to his meeting with Senate Democrats today, the president will huddle with House Republicans on Wednesday and, on Thursday, with Senate Republicans and House Democrats.
Ryan, the GOP's 2012 vice presidential nominee and a potential 2016 presidential candidate, lauded Mr. Obama's so-called "charm offensive" amid the most caging gridlock in modern congressional history. The president's wine-and-dine effort with a dozen Senate Republicans last week at the Jefferson Hotel and subsequent outreach to Ryan, individually, over broiled sea bass at the White House, he said, did not go unnoticed.
"This is the first time I've ever had a conversation with the president lasting more than, say, two minutes or televised exchanges," Ryan said. "I've never really had a conversation with him, on these issues before. I am excited that we had the conversation. We had a very frank exchange."
- no previous page
- next
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 192 Comments
- Obama prom pictures surface 131 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 303 Comments
- Pelosi ties bridge collapse to sequester












no wonder the GOP is on its way out!
House Republicans are planning to raise country's borrowing limit for three months, with a promise to raise it again if Senate Democrats pass a budget. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) promised Sunday that it would happen. If it does, it would be the first time since 2009 that Senate Democrats have passed a budget.
Why is that? Here's a (relatively) simple explanation.
* Democrats don't want the blame. In the Senate, proposing a budget gives Republicans an opportunity to attach amendments that would put political pressure on moderate and conservative Democrats, many of whom already have an eye on their re-election races in 2014. Budget deal-making has always been difficult and budgets almost never come in on time; increasing partisanship has made it even worse. By not introducing a budget, Democrats can keep their names off plans that detail high spending and high deficits. Meanwhile, they can attack House Republicans for their controversial budget plans. (See Ryan, Paul.)
* Democrats couldn't decide on one. Former Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) repeatedly drafted budgets and attempted to bring them to the floor. But pressure from liberal Democrats on one side and conservative Democrats on the other made it a struggle. In 2011, Conrad proposed a budget that many Democrats attacked as going too far to the right. In May of that year, Conrad announced that Democrats were "very close to an agreement" after some concessions to liberals, but that he would defer to the high-level bipartisan negotiations over the debt ceiling. Democrats did decide on a blueprint in July but did not put it up for a vote. In 2012 Conrad worked on a modified version of Simpson-Bowles but with little hope of a vote. Now, he is gone — having retired at the end of the 113th Congress.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget
So Congress is required by law to pass a budget, not the President. If you want to see all the President's budget proposals you can see them here.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionGPO.action?collectionCode=BUDGET
At some point these guys are going to realize that their ideas stink, but it may take another election cycle or two before that finally sinks in. They seem to believe that it is simply a communications issue ... if people understood them they would support them. The exact opposite is true, but they have not figured that out yet. Like I said - stupid.