Paul Ryan to unveil new budget plan on Tuesday
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan's last few budget blueprints have landed with a big splash in Washington, lambasted by foes as a dangerous attack on the social safety net and lauded by allies as a courageous plan to right America's fiscal ship.
But despite the commotion he's sown, the Wisconsin Republican isn't backing down from a fight with his next budget, due to be unveiled next week on Tuesday, saying on "Fox News Sunday": "We owe the American people a balanced budget." He added that he's ready to deliver.
Ryan credited the recent "fiscal cliff" - which slashed spending and raised revenue - with at least partially closing the yawning fiscal gap seen in previous years. "We don't have to do huge things to get the balance because of the new baseline" created by the "cliff," said Ryan, adding that "it is fair to say" that those policies pushed by the president have made his job easier.
"We don't want to refight the 'fiscal cliff,'" he said. "That's current law. That's not going to change."
Still, Ryan disagreed starkly with other elements of the president's fiscal record, repeating his frequent admonition to "end the raid of Medicare from Obamacare."
"You have to remember, all of that money that was taken from Medicare was to pay for Obamacare," Ryan said, referencing the $716 billion that the Affordable Care Act slashed from Medicare provider payments to fund the new law. "We say we get rid of Obamacare, we end the raid, and we apply those savings to Medicare to make Medicare more solvent and extend the solvency of the Medicare trust fund."
When told by "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace that an Obamacare repeal is probably a non-starter, Ryan replied: "Well, we believe it should. That's the point."
Wallace noted that Ryan's last budget "cut Medicaid by $770 billion, over the next 10 years. You cut $134 billion from food stamps. You cut $166 billion from education, training, and social services," and asked the budget maven whether his prescriptions were too austere.
Ryan asserted that many of the programs he would cut "don't work," adding: "What we propose is to consolidate these programs into flexible grants that go back to the states."
"On food stamps, we basically say, you actually have to qualify for the food stamp programs to get the food stamp benefits," he explained. "And, with respect to Medicaid, we think the Obamacare expansion of Medicaid is reckless. We are pushing people, 20 million people, into a program that's failing...And we want to reform Medicaid by giving states the ability to customize the Medicaid program to meet the unique needs" of their population.
Particularly controversial in Ryan's last few budget blueprints was his proposal to gradually phase out Medicare's guaranteed benefits in favor of a premium support system to subsidize seniors in the private insurance market - a plan derided as "voucher-care" by opponents who have accused Ryan of trying to "end Medicare as we know it."
Ryan took issue with that characterization: "First of all, it's not a voucher. It's premium support. Those are very different. A voucher is you go to your mailbox, you get a check, and you buy something. That's not what we are saying."
"We are saying, let's convert Medicare into a system that works like the one I have as a congressman," he explained. "You have a list of guaranteed coverage options, including traditional Medicare for your future needs. Medicare subsidizes your plan based on who you are, total subsidy for the poor and the sick, less of a subsidy for wealthy seniors.
"Doing it this way, harnessing the power of choice and competition...is the best way to save Medicare for future generations," Ryan said. "The problem is, Medicare is going broke."
Ryan also pushed back against the suggestion that his Medicare proposal hurt Republicans in 2012, noting, "We won the senior vote."
Ryan also repeated his call for "pro-growth tax reform" that lowers rates across the board by eliminating tax expenditures. "That's good for economic growth," he said, "That's good for job creation and hard-working tax payers, by having less loopholes in the tax code."
President Obama has also lobbied Congress to eliminate tax loopholes, but he would apply the new revenue generated to deficit reduction, while Ryan would use those savings to lower rates as part of a revenue-neutral tax reform package.
"Look, we already had a tax increase," Ryan explained. "We think it's unfair to ask hardworking taxpayers to pay more so Washington can spend more."
"Tax reform to us is an economic growth-generating exercise," he said. "Tax reform to the president, so far, seems to be a spending growth exercise."
"So, there is an impasse there," he said.
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 147 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story" 260 Comments
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 505 Comments
- GOP Sen. Murkowski backs same-sex marriage
- Obama renews push for a nuclear disarmament legacy
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows
get the hook !
advance his age 30-40 years and then what will he propose..
Typical Tea Bag/GOP death panel for seniors.
Is hne ready for a new photo op in a Kitchen shelter.
Sales Wease extroadinair!
President Barack Obama will not have his budget completed in time to meet the legally-required February 4th deadline.
"The administration was forced to delay some of its FY 2014 budget preparations, which in turn will delay the budget's submission to Congress," said Acting Budget Director Jeff Zients in a letter to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) on Monday. "We will submit it to Congress as soon as possible."
President Obama has only once submitted his budget on time. Obama's first budget wasn't submitted until May, his second came on deadline, and his last two were submitted in late February. That, says Rep. Ryan's office, gives Obama the distinction of missing more budget deadlines than any president since the 1920s.
Yet Obama has chastised the practice of blowing deadlines. In the midst of the dustup over the fiscal cliff, Obama admonished lawmakers for waiting until the last minute to meet deadlines. "America wonders why it is in this town why you can't get stuff done in an organized timetable," said Obama. "Why everything has to always wait until the last minute. We're now at the last minute. The American people are not going to have any patience for a politically self-inflicted wound to our economy."
"Let's not miss this deadline," Obama said. "That's the bare minimum we should be able to get done."
As for when Pres. Obama plans to submit his FY 2014 budget, the White House hasn't said. Zients says the Obama Administration is "working diligently" on getting it done.
------------------------------------------------------
Same old, same old. Ryan is proposing things that were non starters with the Democrats and were rejected at the polls. Had they been acceptable to the American people, he would have been VP today.
This is what I hate about these pols. They never ever consult with the opposition to see what common ground exisits. People like Ryan think they know best, come up with a plan that has no chance at all, gain the headlines, have their plan rejected and then start playing the blame game. No wonder the approval rating for Congress is in the toilet.
This hits it RIGHT ON THE HEAD.
What is there about moderation that is so difficult. The old zombie cure-all of privatization re-bounds again. But of course this fellow worships atthe Zombie idea altar.
You can't "repeal" Obamacare without a replacement plan and......no returning to the same old unrestrained cost structure is not a solution either.
BTW don't remember you cut taxes pseudo conservatives giving credit to the Obama administration 2 years ago when this gift was presented to you. How is it that a President can be criticized for rising taxes but never gets credit when they go down? Might also want to point out that the executive has no power over taxes, that is the purview of the Congress.
I mean real Republicans, true conservatives. Not the POS RINO's (or DINO's) that have infested our society, controlled by fiscal lib 'conservatives' >cough<.
---------------------------------
Sigh. No historical memory, I guess. There was a time when Republicans were the liberals - Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, for instance. Even as late as 1964, liberal Republicans were there to insure the passage of the Omnibus Civil Rights Act. It has only been since then that Republicans betrayed their roots and sided with the reactionaries, both social and religious, to create class warfare in America.