prev
next
Obama administration struggles to illustrate pain from sequester
The Obama administration has overreached three times in the past 10 days in attempting to illustrate the negative impact of the sequester spending cuts in the short term, giving fodder to those seeking to play down the impact of the cuts.
On Monday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters that major airports had seen lines ballooning to 150-200 percent their normal size. The Transportation Security Administration later clarified that it was not yet seeing longer-than-normal checkpoint lines, though Customs and Border Protection told CBS News there had been increased wait times at two airports due to reduced staffing.
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday, however, that "officials representing a dozen major airports said there were few if any unusual flight delays or lines at security or customs checkpoints." That included an official at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York, which is one of the two airports that had been specifically cited by Customs and Border Protection.
On Friday, meanwhile, President Obama said that janitors at the U.S. Capitol would receive a pay cut due to the sequester cuts. Carlos Elias, the superintendent of the U.S. Capitol building and the Capitol Visitors Center, quickly emailed employees to say "This is NOT TRUE," adding that "The pay and benefits of EACH of our employees WILL NOT be impacted."
The prior Sunday, Education Secretary Arne Duncan had said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that "There are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can't come back this fall." He later acknowledged that he "misspoke" after fact checkers found no evidence for the claim.
On Monday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was asked what was being done to ensure the figures were not being exaggerated. Carney responded by pointing to long-term projections of job losses from economic analysts and "numerous examples already of what's going to happen," including plans to furlough 750,000 Department of Defense Workers.
Pressed about the issue again Tuesday - specifically why Napolitano did not check her facts before making her claims regarding longer lines - Carney said it is a "fact" that "there will be negative effects on our air traffic because of the reductions in FAA man hours, air traffic controllers in particular."
"And efforts to muddy that fact by, you know, singling out a certain statement...we can do that, but there are real people out there who will be delayed or who will have their wages cut or...who will lose their jobs as a result of the sequester, while folks in Washington are arguing over whether this particular impact happened when we said it was going to happen or a week later or a month later," he said.
- With sequester in place, what's next?
- Obama calling GOP senators to talk sequester fix
- Complete coverage: The Sequester
There is no question that the $1.2 trillion in nearly across-the-board sequester spending cuts -- $85 billion this year - will have a significant impact in a number of areas, including air travel. The Congressional Budget Office predicted it could mean 750,000 fewer jobs by the end of the year and reduce GDP by 0.5 percent; among those who could lose their jobs are FBI agents, food safety inspectors and border agents. Barring changes, there will be significant cuts to Head Start, nutrition assistance and special education programs, research funding, public housing support, the FDA, NASA, the SEC, the CDC, the NIH and a host of other programs and agencies. Military operations will be cut by $13.5 billion, with $3.5 billion in cuts to aircraft purchases by the Air Force and Navy. Airport security and immigration enforcement will be cut by an estimated $323 billion each, and border security will be cut by about $581 million.
Most Americans are not directly affected by these cuts, however, which is why the administration has sought to put the focus on issues like air travel that have a broader reach. But while officials expect increases in delays as overtime is reduced, hiring is frozen and air traffic controllers are furloughed due to the sequester, the impact will be gradual. In its zeal to make the case for a more immediate impact than seems to have happened, the administration may have made it harder to undo the cuts down the road, said former John McCain communications director Dan Schnur, Director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California.
"There's more than a little bit of a White House-who-cried-wolf danger that's beginning to emerge," he said. "If the sequester does eventually cause serious inconvenience or real pain to many people, these overstatements may not have much of a long-term impact. But in the short run, it makes the voters more skeptical as to whether the administration is being honest with them."
It's worth noting that in his Friday news conference, Mr. Obama seemed to be trying to temper some of the strong warnings that his administration had pushed. He said the sequester is "dumb" but "is not going to be an apocalypse," adding that it will hurt people but probably not cause a "huge financial crisis."
- no previous page
- next
1/2
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 204 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
This is what Centrism sounds like:
"I'm sure you're as mad as I am: Washington D.C. politicians retreating to their separate corners, throwing stones, and screaming until they're red in the face.
"It might make for good cable TV, but it's not helping address the many critical issues America and Oregon are facing. I ran for Congress to solve problems - not to get into partisan shouting matches or waste your time.
"Fortunately, a common-sense, bipartisan coalition called No Labels has come together, and we're committed to moving past partisan labels and getting things done.
"Here are just a few of the things we're calling for to make Congress more functional:
"* No budget. No pay. If Congress can't even pass a budget, then we shouldn't get paid. This proposal passed and was signed into law this month.
"* No pledge except the oath of office. I've had enough of pledges from extremists on either side of the aisle coming ahead of what's right for America. Members of Congress should pledge to serve our constituents and the American people - not hyper-partisan figures like Grover Norquist.
"* Empower sensible bipartisan majorities in the House and Senate. Congress should reassert itself and require bills go through the committee process and not be tools for the leadership. If a bipartisan majority wants a law to receive an up-or-down vote, then it should.
"* Focus on jobs. Members of Congress need to put our differences aside and continue to focus on getting Americans back to work and aid the recovery by really solving our debt and deficit issues.
"* More honest bipartisan cooperation. Members should work more closely together, in committees and on the floor of the House, to stop the endless stream of negative attacks and made-for-TV arguments.
"These are just a few of the reforms I'll be taking on. And I look forward to keeping you up-to-date as we make progress. Please join me on Facebook right now - let me know what priorities you want to see Congress address as we move forward."
Thanks,
Congressman Kurt Schrader
Evolve - not as far as I can see.
---------------------------------
Helps to be on the outside looking in.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57572748/much-of-$60b-from-u.s-to-rebuild-iraq-wasted-special-auditors-final-report-to-congress-shows/
It seems to me that we have had positive job growth every month since 2010 at least. And almost 200,000 jobs were added last month alone.
Hey Fish Bro -- What's the difference between today's Democrat and a Marxist/Socialist???
nothing
<smile>
-------------------------------------------------------
Hey Ranger!... Do you know what the difference is between a Democrat and a Republican???
nothing
<smile>
Me being from the outside of the big 2... I don't see much.
They both like to spend spend spend... On different things. For example... The republicans while thinking they are fiscally conservative. Are completely responsible for the 60 billion lost in Iraq. Sending truckloads of money to countries that hate us.
Whereas Democrats like to give it away to lazy people in America. And ENTITLEMENTS.
Sometimes it seems the Republicans are a little hypocritical on spending.
We are just back to the Gilded Age before the last Republicon Great Depression starting in 1929.