By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ February 28, 2013, 11:58 AM

After delays and controversy, House approves domestic violence bill

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal., addresses the Violence Against Women Act.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal., addresses the Violence Against Women Act.

Updated: 3:19 p.m. ET

After months of delays and debate, the House today approved the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a new version of a formerly longstanding law aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence.

The bill, which the Senate approved earlier this month, passed by a bipartisan vote of 286-138.The bill will now to President Obama for final approval.

The law was originally passed in 1994 as part of a larger crime bill, and has been reauthorized twice since then. But efforts in 2011 to again extend it failed, amid Republican concerns about expanded protections for undocumented immigrants and same-sex couples. No similar legislation has made it through Congress until today.

During Senate debate over the bill several weeks ago, Republicans had expressed particular concerns about a provision that would enable the prosecution in tribal courts of attackers who are not of American Indian descent, arguing that that it would expand the reach of tribal court power. But amid pressure from Democrats and women's advocacy groups, and an ongoing GOP struggle to appeal more broadly to women, a significant number of Republicans voted for the bill anyway.

Shortly before the vote on this Democratic-penned bill, the House voted against a GOP version that excluded provisions protecting LGBT and Native American victims. The bill was rejected along bipartisan lines by a vote of 166-257.

Upon passage in the House, the Senate bill's supporters applauded and cheered. Later in the afternoon, Vice President Joe Biden stopped by a pre-existing Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month event to deliver remarks on the news, and said working to protect victims of domestic violence was the "proudest" with which he's been associated.

"Until it is accepted it is the norm, that any man who raises his hand to a woman on a date is a coward, and treated as such, until that day comes, we still have a long way to go," he said.

The vice president also praised House leaders from both sides of the aisle for making the bill's success possible.  

"Leaders from both parties made this possible... including a man who is -- has kept his word, a man who is viewed as sort of the anti--the anti-administration person, but is a friend of mine, Eric Cantor," Biden said. "He kept his word: He said he'd let, he'd let the Congress speak. He could have prevented this from coming to a vote under the ordinary rules that have been employed in the past, but he didn't. So I want to, probably hurt him, but I want to publicly thank him. Because he kept his word, where I come from, your word matters."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Lucy Madison On Twitter »

    Lucy Madison is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GOP-R--Con-Men says:
Once again republicans had to be forced to get out of the way allowing Democrats to pass the Violence Against Women Act.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ClarissaYJADA says:
A seriously long overdue accomplishment to help prevent this from occurring to any other women or human being. http://yourejustadumbass.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
Of course, this bill should have been passed last summer, but the Republicans in the House blocked it, even after the Republicans in the Senate agreed with the wording of the Senate version that was voted on today.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
Women -

Take note of who those 138 were that voted against this bill. Throw them out of office in 2014. You can do it!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
peter_out says:
The Hastert rule is only a guide to be guided by, not a law, not definite, and Republicans and Democrats use the rough measures of Hastert to see if it is even worth the time to go through the drill with less than 50 and 50. It is not the only guide, as in this case Boehner knew more about the probable outcome from additional indicaters than Hastert. Discretion is part of the leader's prerogative.

Nobody is in favor of violence against women. This is all about the right way to draw a House bill.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Woodworkerwaynew says:
MYFAULT2 said it all - DV rates are about 50/50 between the genders (and yes, that applies within hetero relationships as well) I have lived through and witnessed with others more cases of females "gaming" the system to gain the upper hand in a soured relationship. The law enforcement and INjustice system is so heavily biased in favor of females its nothing short of revolting.

Why don't more men report ? Probably because they know that, even if the female is the aggressor, the male is the one that will be arrested, tried, and convicted with little-to-no real hard evidence required.
reply
AttyFAM replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wrong!

See http://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/resources/statistics.html

Rape/physical assault - 25% for women, 7.6% for men
Murder - women are the victim 3X as often.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stevex47 says:
"Republicans had expressed particular concerns about a provision that would enable the prosecution in tribal courts of attackers who are not of American Indian descent"

This is why the birthers voted against protecting women?

Jindahl was right, the party of stupid.
reply
AttyFAM replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Slow -

If those men are white, they are Republicans.
GOP-R--Con-Men replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Looks like republicans were protecting white men raping Native American women on reservations.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mogul7 says:
Why is it that there should be a distinction between violence against one person over another? Does noone else see that we are compartmentalizing justice??? Freedom and Justice should be the same from the bottom most rung in our society to the uppermost. There should not be a separate law about violence against XYZ subgroup within our society. And it is amazing that these twits we have elected think this actually HELPS- or maybe that was the plan... to further fracture and separate our psychology into more and more sub groups, so that we do not band together and really address our core issues.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
myfault2 says:
I'm tired of women always being named as the victims.
http://domesticviolencestatistics.org/men-the-overlooked-victims-of-domestic-violence/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sy2502 says:
I am a woman, but I dislike laws that make crimes against a certain group of people more serious than the same exact crime against a different group of people. Battery is battery, assault is assault, murder is murder. One life isn't more important than another, and a beating from a spouse isn't worse than a beating from a stranger. All crimes should be prosecuted and punished.
reply
See all 14 Comments