By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ February 25, 2013, 4:44 PM

Where will the sequester cuts hit your community?

Massive spending cuts are only four days away as Washington still battles over new taxes and new cuts.

Massive spending cuts are only four days away as Washington still battles over new taxes and new cuts.

With just four days before a sweeping set of across-the-board budget cuts is slated to go into effect, the Obama administration is ramping up pressure on Congress to reach a deal for averting the so-called "sequestration," which would carve out $1.2 trillion from defense and non-defense spending over the course of the next 10 years. But as the clock ticks toward the deadline with no apparent deal in sight, the White House Sunday night issued a dire memo about what, specifically, will go on the chopping block in the event that no deal is reached.

The memo rounds up the administration's state-by-state calculation of exactly how much money will be slashed from education programs; military and defense spending; public health programs; law enforcement, and others over the course of the fiscal year if sequestration goes into effect. But as Mr. Obama pointed out in remarks this morning, not all of the cuts will be enacted immediately: Even after March 1 - the date they kick into action - Congress can take action to negate their impact.

In the meantime, however, here's a guide to what the projected cuts are according to the White House and where they'll be the steepest. The figures below represent cuts that will take place over the remainder of the fiscal year, which ends in September.

Education

According to the White House, sequestration would be devastating to the nation's already hard-hit public education system: A fact sheet released earlier this month says 70,000 kids would be kicked off Head Start, 10,000 teachers would find themselves at risk of unemployment, and funding would be eliminated for up to 7,2000 special education teachers, aides and staff.

In states like California, Texas, New York, and Florida, those cuts look particularly dramatic:

  • California would lose $87.6 million in funding for primary and secondary education, as well as $62.9 million in funding for education with disabilities. The number of students who would no longer be served is 187,000; meanwhile, 1,210 teacher and aide jobs would be at risk and 320 schools would lose funding. The White House also says 8,200 children would lose access to Head Start and 9,600 low-income students would lose access to work-study aid.
  • Texas would lose $67.8 million worth of funding for primary and secondary education; 172,000 fewer students would be served. The state would also lose $51 million in funding for teachers, aides and staff who help children with disabilities.
  • Florida would lose $54.5 million in funding for primary and secondary education, putting 750 teacher and aide jobs at risk.
  • New York would see cuts of $42.7 million to primary and secondary education, and 4,300 kids would lose access to early education.

Defense

The Department of Defense has been consistently vehement in its opposition to the sequester cuts, warning for months of the ways in which budget reductions would hit the nation's military readiness. Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, in a series of farewell appearances at the end of his tenure, railed against Congress for inaction on the issue, and warned that the ability to effectively confront sweeping security challenges is at a risk as a result. States with heavy military presences would be particularly hard hit:

- In Virginia, 90,000 Defense Department employees would be furloughed, far and away the most in the country, and gross military pay would be reduced by $648.4 million overall. The army would lose $146 million in funding, the air force would lose $8 million, and a number of naval projects could be canceled or delayed.

  • California would see 64,000 defense jobs furloughed, and it would lose $15 million worth of air force funding.
  • In Texas, Army funding would be reduced by $233 million and Air Force funding would be reduced by $27 million. Gross military pay in the state would be cut by $274.8 million.
  • Maryland, too, would see big cuts in gross military pay, with a $353.7 million dollar reduction.
  • Hawaii's Army operation funding, meanwhile, would be cut by about $106 million.

Public health

The White House has also warned that up to 2,100 fewer food inspections could occur under the sequestration, and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) might have to furlough all its employees for up to two weeks. Not only would this pose public health risks, the administration argues, it would also potentially add costs in lost food production. Plus, a number of states would see losses in public health funding and access to funding for the treatment and prevention for substance abuse and HIV.

  • New York would see $2.7 million in cuts to the department of public health.
  • California would lose $2.6 million in funds for public health threat responses, another $12.4 million worth of grants to prevent and treat substance abuse.
  • In Florida, funding providing meals for seniors would be slashed by $3.8 million.
  • Funding for vaccines would be cut by $1.1 million in California, which would eliminate free vaccinations for 15,810 kids.

Social programs

A number of social programs would also be hit by sequester cuts: The administration says about 600,000 women and children would be dropped from the Department of Agriculture's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program from March through September, resulting in 1,600 job losses. And more than 100,000 formerly homeless people would be kicked out of housing and shelter programs, according to a White House fact sheet.

There are also implications for job training, child care, and victim protection:

  • Ohio would lose out on $1.8 million worth of funds toward helping people find jobs; according to the White House, that means 57,100 people will lose out on that assistance.
  • In Texas, 2,300 children would lose access to child care.
  • Illinois would lose $274,000 worth of funding provided by the Violence Against Women Act, impacting 1,000 victims.

Steve Chaggaris and Lindsey Boerma contributed to this report.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Lucy Madison On Twitter »

    Lucy Madison is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

57 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
Budget cuts? WHAT budget? They're still gonna spend like crazy, regardless :P
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stamicrach says:
I evidently have been under the false impression that these funding cuts were going to be made to "discretionary spending.

Could somebody please tell me when things like EDUCATION,defense spending, Medicare, Medicaid, law enforcement etc. became "discretionary" spending.??

If our troops were brought back from Afghanistan tomorrow; we could save a couple million paying to keep them supplied every month.

We could stop the rape of our economy by cutting of the millions paid to Afghanistan to rebuild theur infrastructure.

We could save a couple million if we didn't have to pay Pakistan for the privilege of letting US troop supply trucks cross their border.

We could probably save a couple more million if we also didn't have to pay a "fee" for each truck that crosses the Pakistani border.

We could save millions if Obama would just enforce the laws regarding illegal immigrants.

We could also save millions by allowing US citizens to set up businesses. like 7-Eleven etc. by setting Americans up. not charging Americans taxes to operate them for five years and allowing them to then sell them to a relative when the five years were up and starting the same tax-free program for another five years.

There is no limit to the amount of times they can do this.

How many 7-Eleven stores can you locate that are run by Americans.?

This is just one small percentage of the number of places we could save millions.

Take a wild guess at how many more millions we could save if we stopped all this damn foolishness; and actually started looking our for our own for a change.Another way to save millions would e to repeal Obamacare.

This BS document is 2,000+ pages long.

Tell me how it is humanly possible to create 2,000 plus pages of directives pertaining just to health care.

The fact that this disaster is more than 2,000 pages long is no accident.

Obama knew full well no sitting, voting Congressman was going to read the whole thing, and he threw everything but the kitchen sink in there; much of it giving the government the power to fine already struggling individuals and small business; or confiscate your possessions or jail you if you fail to comply with this BS.

Obama is doing everything in his power (under the direction of George Soros) to lead the US down the path to Socialism/Marxism.

If the American people knew half of what our government is plotting behind our backs; most of us would be sitting in a corner; pulling on our lower lips and jabbering.

If "We the People" continue to let Obama and Congress get away with this treachery, we will have no one but ourselves to blame for the circumstance we will be forced to live under.

And when Americans finally do wake up and smell the stink of our government, it will be TOO LATE.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ben_Franklin1776 says:
Wow, this 2% is truly magical. It seems it funds everything in the government.

Maybe we should just cut keep this $80 billion and cut the rest since it seems like nothing is funded by the remainder at all.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrUniteUs2012 says:
Whose to blame for the sequestor? We the public if we don't convince
Congress to act. At least a million Americans will lose jobs.
The government and businesses will lose billions in revenue.
Cost associtated with unemployment like crime and welfare will go up.
The sequestor may in fact increase the budget defict.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fxr60 says:
The Sequester amounts to TWO CENTS OUT OF EVERY DOLLAR-Obama spends more than that on his vacations, golfing, parties, etc. Former Gov. Barber of Mississippi said that one year they had a budget deficit and he cut NINE CENTS of every dollar across the board-EVERYTHING and couldn't even tell that they missed it. Obama is trying to scare everyone and play poltics to push his radial agenda! He has NOT passed a budget in FOUR years, he wrote one, but NO ONE VOTED FOR IT- Not even one Democrat! That should tell you something about what kind of inept leader he is!! The House has passed two and Obama and his ilk won't even look at them! Parada the Russian on line newspaper was right when they wrote "Obama Re-elected by Illiterate Society" in other words "By IGNORANT PEOPLE"!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CrazyConservative says:
So let's get this right. The government passed a 2% tax increase on all taxpayers (not just the wealthy), and we are supposed to find ways to adjust our budgets. But, the bloated government can not find 2% (amount of sequester) to cut from it's budget? Are you kidding me?

Where were the crying and whining politicians when millions of taxpayers had to cut items from our budgets? The taxpayers have not created the deficit. The politicians have. let them get us out of it without tax increases.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mewilber says:
Talk about uninformed parrots? its only 2% from a massive, bloated bureaucracy that squanders trillions of - our money! The sheep are so used to being feed this crap they actually think it tastes good. What about the president flying around the country complaining about corporate jets when it costs millions per flight for Air Force One? What about a federal workforce of millions? what about a massive building program going on right now in Dc to house more bureaucrats? Stop the madness, quit listening to the whiners and return our republic to sound financial footing.
reply
fxr60 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mewilber-Now Obama and the White House is for sale for $500,000. Besides Obama's flying to Hawaii and everwhere on taxpayers money-here are some more WASTED TAXPAYERS MONEY on his Green engery: Solyndra $535 MILLION, Beacon Power: $69 MILLION, Evergreen Solar $24 MILLION, Nevada Geothermal $98.r MILLION, Battery maker A123 $132 MILLION out of the Stimulas pkg. and they went bankrupt! Sunpower $1.5 BILLION, First Solar $1.46 BILLION, Abound Solar $374 MILLION, LSP Energy $2.1 BILLION. And this is ONLY A PARTICAL LIST!!!!! Obama will bankrupt this country and we will be 20-25 TRILLION before he leaves office!!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Donnie_G says:
Asking who is responsible for the sequester simply shows just how dysfunctional our federal government has become. There's plenty of blame to go around, and no one side can lay claim to having a moral or ethical advantage over the other. The bottom line is that both sides in this dispute agreed to the terms of the sequester specifically because it would be equally as painful for them both, and that's a good thing. No pain no gain! If it takes swallowing this bitter pill to undo the current state of gridlock in government and bring both sides back to a middle ground of compromise, then so be it. Let the sequester happen.
reply
danstoner replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen, kudos, and hear hear, Donnie G.... FINALLY a voice of reason; finally, someone whose not a nincompoop lemming, blindly towing the line of one wing or the other of the NeoConOCrat Uni-Party. Thank you.
mario.a.rivas@gmail.com replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Indeed Donnie_G, add to your observation that we are talking about a proposal that nobody wanted and was supposed to be a tool for serious budget work. Furthermore we are only talking about cuts to discretionary spending which at $1319 billion cover 35% of the total expenditures of $3793 billion. The sequester $108 billion represent 8% of discretionary spending and < 3% of total spending.
Of course everybody (left and right) are busy preparing talking points that say how many millions hit x (replace with your favorite item). Instead of talking about the tough things: tax reform, entitlement reform, social security adjustments.
Can we have some leadership and stop the insanity?!?!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taylorsucram says:
Good God people ... Ronald Reagan changed the U.S. from a "Manufacturing" Economy into a "Service" Economy ( do you want fries with that shake?) He touted three major agenda items. Two of these were just like George Bush's 20 years later: greatly increase defense spending and slash taxes on the wealthy (remember its called "Voodoo Economics). He did both. His greatest effort was devoted to cutting the top tax rate from 70% to 50% to 38% to 28%, giving obesely wealthy Americans gigantic new piles of money to play with.

The national debt nearly tripled on Reagan's watch, from $993 billion to $2.6 trillion. George W. Bush added an extra $4.9 trillion to the national debt while he smirked his way around the Oval Office.

Further, does anybody remember Ronald Reagan's Guns-for-Hostages, "Iran/Contra/Cocaine" fiasco with Oliver North (Bengazi is small potatoes)? How about Reagan's Savings & Loan Crisis or the Keating Five and John McCains' roll in the biggest Savings and Loan failure in the history of the United States?

Yea, I didn't think so ..... otherwise the Bush Banking Scandal would never have happened and the Republicans would never have been given a "majority" in the "House" or anywhere else!!!

YOU HAVE NO ONE TO BLAME BUT YOURSELVES . . . . .
reply
southmsdixon replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Oh! 2.6
Can you say 16 Trillion?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MacMiller40 says:
It's just a cut in growth. We'll be spending more money, just not as much more. How can that cause so many dire consequences.
reply
See all 57 Comments