CBS News/ February 19, 2013, 6:00 AM

Deadline looming, Obama urging Congress to deal with budget cuts

As the clock ticks on the automatic spending cuts set to kick in on March 1, President Obama will hold an event this morning to urge Congress to come up with an alternative plan to avert the cuts.

The White House says Mr. Obama will emphasize the potential negative effects of the so-called sequester - the $1.2 trillion over 10 years in cuts - by standing with first responders, people who the White House says will be directly affected by the cuts.

The president "will be joined at the White House by emergency responders - the kinds of working Americans whose jobs are on the line if Congressional Republicans fail to compromise on a balanced solution," a White House official said in a statement.

"The President will challenge Republicans to make a very simple choice: do they protect investments in education, health care and national defense or do they continue to prioritize and protect tax loopholes that benefit the very few at the expense of middle and working class Americans?" the official continued.

The $1.2 trillion sequester cuts, which were initially set to kick in on Jan. 1, emerged out of Congress' 2011 budget negotiations. Congress agreed that if a congressional "supercommittee" couldn't come up with an acceptable deficit reduction plan, Congress would just slash $1.2 trillion from the budget over 10 years -- half coming from defense spending and half from non-defense. The cuts were designed to be so drastic that Republicans and Democrats would be compelled to craft an alternate, bipartisan agreement on deficit reduction.

Ten days out, however, no single substitute plan exists and lawmakers are on a week's recess until next Monday.

Economists agree the steep, across-the-board cuts would slow the economy. The White House recently laid out the ways the sequester would hurt the middle class, from slashing education programs to small business loan guarantees. Taking $1.2 trillion out of the economy would put close to a million jobs at risk, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated.

The president and his chief of staff Denis McDonough have publicly prodded Congress multiple times since Mr. Obama's State of the Union address last Tuesday, emphasizing education, manufacturing, and immigration reform as the keys to growth. In his weekly address over the weekend, Mr. Obama lobbied for his "balanced approach" to deficit reduction that would combine "responsible reforms" on health care spending and taxes to stabilize our finances.

The president contrasted his approach with Republicans, who have proposed "even bigger cuts to things like education and job training, Medicare and Social Security benefits."

"That won't work," Mr. Obama said. "We can't just cut our way to prosperity."

Meantime, McDonough said the president hasn't "given up" on coming up with an alternative to avert the current set of cuts and he's doing "everything he can to not let this happen." In his State of the Union address last week, McDonough said, the president laid out what he's prepared to offer to avoid the cuts.

"We're ready to do another trillion-and-a-half to get to the $4 trillion mark that every economist in the country says we need to do to stabilize the debt problem," McDonough said on "Face the Nation" Sunday.

"Now when we think of the kinds of things that we're going to have to invest in, the president has also been very clear that he's ready to take on, as he laid out in the speech, a question like rising health care costs and Medicare."


1/2

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
44 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GOP-R--Con-Men says:
Teabaggers can't get over losing the civil war and control over Blacks. That's why they are constantly refighting the civil war with President Obama. Him as president is a painful reminder of their military, legal and moral losses.
reply
GOP-R--Con-Men replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hillz, Race Card? Do you know the history of America? Obviously you don't your ignorance of American histroy prevents you from connecting the teabaggers dots.
GOP-R--Con-Men replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So you think history plays no part in the equation? Hillz, I thought you had at least a few synapse working in your cranium but your last statement prove me wrong.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ucjb says:
"...deep spending cuts roughly $85 billion" out of 3.5 trillion. The lame stream media is so funny. 85 billion is little more than a rounding error, loose change.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
olyboy says:
First, the coming cuts were Obama's idea in the first place. Second, it is job of congress to obstruct the president when he proposes actions that are not in the interest of those who elected them to office. Somehow Obama can't get it into his head that his opposition in congress was ELECTED TO STOP HIM. Our system of government is functioning as designed. It prevents a single branch of government from running roughshod over another as Obama would like to do. The funny thing is that the separation of powers was put in place to protect the large minority from the dangers of a majority.
reply
GOP-R--Con-Men replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The wealthy's income has skyrocketed. Corporations are making record profits while middle and working class Americans salaries remain stagnant. All this while republicans continue fighting to give corporations, big oil, big pharma and the wealthy more and more subsidies and tax breaks/loopholes to them. As they block any help to middle-working class Americans from President Obama and Democrats. This makes the nonsense from republican shills like BOBW101,7LuckySeven,Mortar29 1SG,JV1970,Hillzagain, OLYBOY and their ilk so pathethic.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
venned says:
"Already some in Congress are trying to undo these automatic spending cuts. My message to them is simple, no. I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts, domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off ramps on this one."
Barack Obama 11/21/2012
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gtttrades says:
Boehner keeps referring to "the president's sequester cuts" but actually the congress instituted the sequester cuts as motivation for them to do something. If the group of republicans and democrates could not agree, then the sequester cuts would go into effect.
Of course the congress did nothing and here we are.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ambivalent11 says:
trout-fish replies:

Ummm, you notice Congress out on a "break"?


And Obama spent the weekend in Florida with his boyfriend Reggie Love. . . where was Michelle. . .
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
Funny, during the second debate Obama said the sequester would never happen. We are expecting an almost trillion dollar deficit and all Obama wants to do is raise more taxes. He already raise taxes on everyone when he promised not to by increasing the payroll tax by 2% and also got his way on a 600 billion dollar tax increase over 10 years on the evil rich.
reply
venned replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
He also said he would cut spending $2.50 for every $1.00 increase in taxes.

News Flash - He's a liar, like most politicians.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ambivalent11 says:
trout-fish says:
Congress actually do something?

funny notion



Well fishboy, when was the last time your hero Reid passed a budget in the Senate . . . don't you worry though . . .Obama will keep you in food stamps for a while longer.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrleet60 says:
It is tiring to see elected representatives and a sitting president that cannot come to a single agreement. The reality is, the government wastes money ad nauseum. Services are duplicated across agencies, agencies go into "spending sprees" at the end of each fiscal year to avoid a cut to their budgets, multimillion dollar vacations are taking by the President and his family when most in this country can't afford a single true vacation.

I can understand the need for more revenue, and the fact that many multibillion dollar industries are given tax breaks that are unfair to the citizenry. The issue I have with what is proposed, is EVERY time revenue is increased, rather than utilizing the money to reduce debt/deficit the pols decide it must be SPENT on new programs that supposedly will "grow" the economy in the future.

If the government wants more revenue they must first REDUCE spending. Do not expect more revenue to be an acceptable option if the intent is to simply spend it elsewhere. If a citizen gets a second job to reduce their debt and instead spends spends spends on new items; they have no reason to complain about being in debt.

I think the sequester should be allowed to fall into place. It was proposed by one party, accepted by both and signed by Mr. Obama. Live with your decision.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zmonkee says:
Why does everything come down to the wire with this president? and then all he does is blame-- nice leadership skills!!
reply
See all 44 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right