GOP losing faith on sequester alternative?
The deep, across-the-board "sequester" cuts set to trigger March 1 risk devastating the U.S. economy and should be averted, both political parties have agreed, but - as several Republicans established today - not necessarily at all costs.
Arguing there are "much better ways to do these budget cuts," Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., on CNN's "State of the Union" today said further tinkering with the newly minted tax rates is "off the table," and that Democrats' proposal to generate more revenue isn't going to win over the GOP.
"Let me be very clear - and I'd say this to the president as I say it to you - these spending cuts are going to go through," Barrasso said. "The American people need to know tax cuts are off the table and the Republican Party is not in any way going to trade spending cuts for a tax increase."
Congress and the White House resolved the 2011 debt ceiling drama in part by scheduling for 2012 a host of automatic spending cuts worth $1.2 trillion over 10 years, designed to be so drastic that Republicans and Democrats would be compelled in the meantime to craft an alternate, bipartisan agreement on deficit reduction. Amid the so-called "fiscal cliff" ordeal at the end of 2012, lawmakers granted themselves a two-month extension for March 1.
Two weeks out, no single substitute plan exists.
- With sequester looming, Congress takes a break
- Obama has "not given up" on averting sequester, McDonough says
Appearing on "Face the Nation," former Gov. Haley Barbour agreed the sequester is looking ever more likely to become a reality, and echoed Barrasso's case for cracking down on tax rates.
"There are a lot of Republicans that don't like parts of [the sequester], but they understand we've come to a point where we've got to take action about spending," the Mississippi Republican said. "And the Democrats say the real answer is to have 50 percent more tax increases.
"...It was the president's idea when the sequester was proposed to be put into law a couple of years ago, and there are plenty of reasons for to not want it to go into effect, particularly the defense spending," he continued. "What the Democrats want is another excuse to raise taxes. Their answer to every question is, 'raise taxes.'"
Meantime, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on "Fox News Sunday" tendered the most pro-sequester remarks yet. Qualifying that "ideally, we would have done the right thing" and pass appropriations bills to reduce spending," he said the sequester cuts aren't cuts at all, but a way to reduce the rate of inevitable spending growth.
But President Obama hasn't "given up" on coming up with an alternative to avert the current set of cuts, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough argued on "Face the Nation," and he's doing "everything he can to not let this happen." In his State of the Union address earlier this week, McDonough said, the president laid out what he's prepared to offer to avoid the cuts.
- no previous page
Popular in Politics
- FBI: Surveillance info helped reveal subway, stock exchange bombings 202 Comments
- Jesse Jackson Jr. asks to serve jail sentence before wife
- Obama: "Very easy to slip-slide" into deeper Syrian involvement 94 Comments
- IRS scandal: Is partisanship overshadowing facts? 167 Comments
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story"
- Snowden: U.S. gov't destroyed my chance for fair trial 299 Comments
- Supreme Court strikes down Arizona voting law
- Former critic McCaskill pushes for Hillary Clinton 2016 bid