By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ February 5, 2013, 1:57 PM

Obama calls on Congress to avert sequester

President Obama speaks in the briefing room of the White House February 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.

President Obama speaks in the briefing room of the White House February 5, 2013 in Washington, DC. / BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

Play Video

Obama calls for stopgap sequester fix, says bigger deal "still on the table"

Updated: 2:25 p.m. ET

With just three weeks until a far-reaching set of spending cuts are scheduled to go into effect, President Obama today urged Congress to pass a stopgap measure aimed at staving off more than $1 trillion worth of reductions, calling for a smaller package of spending cuts and tax reforms he said would help avoid putting the economy in jeopardy from "self-inflicted wounds."

"Economists and business leaders from across the spectrum have said that our economy is poised for progress in 2013 and we've seen signs of this progress over the last several weeks," Mr. Obama said told reporters at the White House today. "But we've also seen the effects that political dysfunction can have on our economic progress... The threat of massive, automatic cuts has already started to affect business decisions. So we've been reminded that while it's critical for us to cut wasteful spending, we can't just cut our way to prosperity."

The president urged Congress, not for the first time, to reconsider a "balanced approach" to deficit reduction, and said that deals he had previously been negotiating with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, were "still on the table."

Play Video

Will sequester budget cuts create a recession?

"We've made progress. And I still believe that we can finish the job with a balanced mix of spending cuts and more tax reform," Mr. Obama said. "The proposals that I put forward during the 'fiscal cliff' negotiations in discussions with Speaker Boehner and others are still very much on the table."

In the final hours of 2012, Congress passed a short-term deal to avert the so-called sequester, a $1.2 trillion package of across-the-board spending cuts, spread equally over defense and domestic non-defense spending over the course of 10 years. But that deal expires on March 1, and Congress now faces yet another round of painstaking negotiations over a way to avert cuts that many say would devastate the economy. At the same time, Congress is also digging into negotiations for a bill to fund the government, the funding for which runs out on March 27.

Mr. Obama today pushed Congress to pass an unspecified package of smaller spending cuts, combined with tax reforms made by closing corporate loopholes, that would buy Congress time to come up with a more comprehensive solution through a bipartisan budget process.

"I know that a full budget may not be finished before March 1st and unfortunately that's the date when a series of harmful automatic cuts to job creating investments and defense spending - also known as the sequester - are scheduled to take effect," he said. "So, if Congress can't act immediately on a bigger package, if they can't get bigger package done by the time the sequester is scheduled to go into effect, then I believe that they should at least pass a smaller package of spending cuts and tax reforms that would delay the economically damaging effects of the sequester for a few more months until congress finds a way to replace these cuts with a smarter solution."

The sequester package was never intended to go into effect: In fact, it was designed to be so potentially devastating as to force Republicans and Democrats to on an alternate solution to reduce the deficit. But amid a bitterly partisan political atmosphere, lawmakers have been unable to agree on a deal to replace it.

"There is no reason that the jobs of thousands of Americans who work in national security or education or clean energy, not to mention the growth of the entire economy, should be put in jeopardy just because folks in Washington couldn't come together to eliminate a few special interest tax loopholes or government programs that we agree need some reform," he said. "Our economy right now is headed in the right direction, and it will stay that way as long as aren't any more self-inflicted wounds coming out of Washington. So let's keep on chipping away at this problem together as Democrats and Republicans to give our workers and our businesses the support that they need to thrive in the weeks and months ahead."

Even before the president delivered his remarks, some House Republicans had begun to register their objections.

In a statement, Boehner, R-Ohio, argued that "the president's sequester" should be replaced with a GOP-passed House bill that would maintain many of the cuts in the original sequester - including those to Medicare - while eliminating some of the defense cuts.

"President Obama first proposed the sequester and insisted it become law," said Boehner. "Republicans have twice voted to replace these arbitrary cuts with common-sense cuts and reforms that protect our national defense... The president's sequester should be replaced with spending cuts and reforms that will start us on the path to balancing the budget in 10 years."

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Kelly Ayotte, R-S.C., released a statement after Mr. Obama spoke, promising to "examine" his proposal. At the same time, they shot down the idea of increased revenues, arguing that "the last thing America needs is a tax increase."

"While the President last year promised that sequestration 'will not happen,' he has declined to address this looming crisis for more than a year. We appreciate that the President now wants to come to the negotiating table and we will examine his proposal closely," the three senators said today in a joint statement. "In the coming days, we will be introducing legislation - as we did last year - to avoid the first year of defense budget cuts by reducing the size of the federal workforce though attrition as recommended by the Simpson-Bowles Commission. This common-sense approach avoids a damaging self-inflicted wound to America's security, and we hope the President will join us in this effort."

Despite Boehner's references to "the president's sequester," 174 House Republicans voted for the measure that put it into place, as did 28 Senate Republicans. Ninety-five House Democrats and 45 Senate Democrats supported the legislation as well.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Lucy Madison On Twitter »

    Lucy Madison is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

136 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
SO the idiot Republicons are whining and crying about the budget but then cry about it when we want to cut costs including the military. Make up you half minds please.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Brainstillworks says:
I now take home $100 less every 2 weeks than I did last year at this time. Same job for 10 plus years. However, health care premiums rose 42% from 2012 and then add on the 2% tax increase (employee SS payroll deduction). On top of that I even got a raise in November yet fell further behind.
Yup....things are really looking up.

Then you have the pro big government crowd trying to sell the notion that Americans pay too little taxes...... don't you wonder what is the point of these articles? Of course these articles always compare country's that have socialized medicine paid via taxes with against simply US Federal Tax rates. Not quite a fair comparison. But they are selling ideas....not truth!
reply
TimeToEvolve replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But you are part of the crowd that wants the big government nanny state to protect you by spending more money on "defense"than anyone else.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
We need to take the government back from Wall Street and then they will do the bidding of the many not the few. How damn stupid are we anyway to let them get away with this?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jim48382 says:
@RepubliCon_Liar_RobMe You keep posting the National Debt Figures on here but you always leave off the last one. After Obabma's 4 years in office he's raised the debt,

National Debt since Obama took office - 6.5 Trillion dollars

Seems he beats everyone for spending....
reply
Jim48382 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama's campaign promise in 2008 was that he'd lower the National Debt to 5 Trillion. Instead he's raised it to 16.5 Trillion. But yes, keep believing everything he tells you....
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jim48382 says:
Putting The U.S. Deficit Into Perspective.

Subject: Budget.
• U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000.
• Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000.
• New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000.
• National debt: $16,271,000,000,000.
• Sequester cut: $ 85,000,000,000

Now, simply remove 8 zeros and pretend it's your household budget.

• Annual family income: $21,700.
• Money the family spent: $38,200.
• New debt on the credit card: $16,500.
• Outstanding balance on credit card: $162,710.
• Total budget cuts: $850.

Seriously? That's all we're going to cut. Now a lot of us know what happens when we run our budgets like this. Our home's get foreclosed on and we lose everything we have. We can't continue to run our budget this way. It needs fixed. Our politicians are crying about a lousy 85 billion cut? It's time to wake them up and tell them we aren't leaving this mess the way it is. It's time to start making some serious cuts.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tank_Commander says:
Let's just let the sequestration happen, OK? Enough of the monthly drama from both sides. They all brought this upon us with their irresponsible spending. Just let it go.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Obama really thinks he should have the authority to push our national debt to 25 trillion........personally.

He really IS that crazy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jhsif12 says:
Yeah, come on congress, let the president kill by drone as many of those traitors to this country that elected him as much as he wants, the democraps might like us then, then we might be able to all get along. Hee hee (couldn't type that with a straight face)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
truth2141 says:
I am tired of an entity that spends over 3T, runs a deficit of over 1T and then claims it is not taking enough in.

Go through gov't spending, prioritize and cut out the 1T that we are over spending.

You know act like an actual responsible grown up rather than a teenager who has over spent their credit card and stomps their feet demanding another one.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NSBL says:
It is shameful to see two houses of Congress as well as one of the least intelligent presidents of our time ruin the country. They should all be fired. There is no simple fix ladies and gentlemen and that is all you wanted to say during the campaign - a sound byte. Even Barack said there wouldn't be a sequester. Well, the dded has been done, there is law on the books. The real issue here is simple, no one, none of the citizenry is ready to take on what measures will be necessary to decrease the deficit, they simply are not ready. They "talk" a good story, bu the Congress plays the game because they know wants the real medecine. Wall St and the bankers got rich, even richer through the bailouts, and the rest have taken a back seat. I wonder if there will truly be a revolution to change the financial abysss - if not, then America has seen it's best days and will continue to decline. How sad... we know the answers but lack the courage to meet the challenge. Our kids will be proud of us.
reply
See all 136 Comments