Panetta says politics at play in Hagel questioning

Former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., President Obama's nominee for Secretary of Defense, testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on January 31, 2013. / SAUL LOEB / AFP / Getty Images
WASHINGTON Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says "the political knives" came out when former Sen. Chuck Hagel appeared before a Senate committee for a confirmation hearing.
Republicans on the Armed Services Committee grilled Hagel about his views on Iran and Israel and other issues.
- WH: Hagel less than perfect but confirmation on track
- Schieffer: Hagel's nomination "may be in trouble"
In discussing the nomination of Hagel, Panetta tells NBC's "Meet the Press" that he is disappointed that the questions Hagel received at the hearing Thursday focused so much on what Hagel has said in the past instead of what he thinks about today's issues.
Panetta says the committee didn't spend enough time discussing such matters as the war in Afghanistan, the war on terrorism, and looming automatic budget cuts and their impact on military readiness.
The Panetta interview airs Sunday on "Meet the Press."
Popular in Politics
- IRS scandal highlights leadership vacancies
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 709 Comments
- Top Obama officials knew about IRS probe, says WH
- Immigration bill would require fingerprinting at 30 airports
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 491 Comments
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal 285 Comments













Well I would be so upset with that line of thinking by the "grillers". For example, I would not want a candidate who advocated peace at all costs to be confirned and then find out he was actually an advocate for using nuclear power in war.
You just can not stick your head in the sand and hope for the best when dealing with this high of a level position. You need to ask any and all questions.
Ok, altogether now . . . DUH.
What a tremendous grasp of the obvious.
Hagel has finally reached the panicle of the Peter Principle.
Both sides are so embittered with each other that, if they all stopped taking lobbyist dollars, the only thing left would be their petty hollow squabbling.
I would dispute Panetta's comment, entirely. I saw genuine reason for questions, and I saw poor responses to the questions.
Ever notice how much of a member's time is spent just giving his/her political viewpoint and how closely they jibe with their party's political line?