AP/ February 2, 2013, 2:54 PM

Biden suggests direct Iran talks are possible

MUNICH

The United States is prepared to hold direct talks with Iran in the standoff over its nuclear ambitions, Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday - but he insisted that Tehran must show it is serious and Washington won't engage in such talks merely "for the exercise."

During a trip to an international security conference in Germany, Biden also addressed Syria's civil war. He met with top Syrian opposition leader Moaz al-Khatib and with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov of Russia, a longtime ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad. Separately, al-Khatib met with Lavrov for the first time, offering a glimmer of hope for stalled diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict, though the Russian minister later sounded skeptical.

Washington has indicated in the past that it's prepared to talk directly with Iran, and talks involving all five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany have made little headway while several rounds of international sanctions have cut into Iran's oil sales and financial transactions.

Last month Iran, in a defiant move ahead of new talks expected soon with the six powers, announced plans to vastly increase its pace of uranium enrichment. That can be used to make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of warheads.

Biden told an international security conference that "there is still time, there is still space for diplomacy backed by pressure to succeed." He did not specify any timeframe.

He insisted that "the ball is in the government of Iran's court" to show that it's negotiating in good faith.

Asked when Washington might hold direct talks with Tehran, Biden replied: "When the Iranian leadership, the supreme leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), is serious."

The U.S. has long made clear that it is prepared to meet directly with the Iranian leadership, he added - "that offer stands but it must be real and tangible and there has to be an agenda that they're prepared to speak to."

"We are not just prepared to do it for the exercise," Biden told the Munich Security Conference.

Russia's Lavrov, whose country is a key player in the six-nation talks with Iran, said it was important to offer Iran clear incentives to resolve the nuclear standoff. "We have to convince Iran that it is not about the regime change," he said.

Iran insists it does not want nuclear arms and argues it has a right to enrich uranium for a civilian nuclear power program, but suspicion persists that the real aim is nuclear weapons. Iran's foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, is to address the conference Sunday.

While Russia and the U.S. have worked together on Iran, their differences over Syria were on display again at the conference in Munich, an annual gathering of top security officials.

In his speech, Biden stressed the conviction of the U.S. and many others that "President Assad - a tyrant hell-bent on clinging to power - is no longer fit to lead the Syrian people and he must go." He said that "the opposition continues to grow stronger."

He later held separate meetings with Lavrov, international peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, and Syria's top opposition leader, Moaz al-Khatib.

On the sidelines of the conference, Lavrov in turn met for the first time with al-Khatib - who in December rejected a previous Russian invitation for talks, Russian news agency ITAR-Tass reported.

On Friday, al-Khatib said he was willing to sit down for talks with Assad's government to "ease the pain of the Syrian people."

Lavrov welcomed that initiative, and said on his flight back to Moscow that Russia and the Syrian opposition plan to stay in regular contact, Russian state news agency RIA Novosti reported.

"This is an important step, given that the coalition was created on the platform of rejecting talks with the regime," he said. "But I think that realism will prevail. Naturally, this does not guarantee that dialogue will start, as the opposition does not have a negotiating team and there are many different groups to agree on a single delegation."

At the conference, Biden told an audience including Lavrov that despite differences, "we can all agree on the increasingly deep plight of the Syrian people and the responsibility of the international community to address that plight."

But Lavrov fired back that "there are a lot of question marks about the Western approaches to those developments," in the region, and questioning when it is "permissible to cooperate with regimes and when is it legitimate to argue for their removal."

Lavrov also suggested Biden's statement that Assad must go was counterproductive.

"The persistence of those who say that priority No. 1 is the removal of President Assad - I think it's the single biggest reason for the continued tragedy in Syria."

Asked whether Russia might be prepared to endorse humanitarian corridors protected by air power, Lavrov bluntly replied: "No. Any threat of use of force will be unacceptable."

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
53 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SlimeBagObama says:
I have an idea. Lets send Speedpump Joe Biden to Iran on a one way ticket. Take his GPS away first. America will be much better off and Irans IQ will drop by 50% by just having him there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JJ_in_tulsa says:
This is the same "has been" as Al
Gore. But whooo, All just sold his network to the oils........ well who knew
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
46tallison says:
I think he and BHO should both go together and tell them how to run their country, and I wouldn't take no for an answer...
Put your money where your mouth is and get going...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sobobx says:
No, jzygirl. Saw 21 countries before I was 21 years old in the Corps. Grunt. Now, go back to your tanning bed.
reply
Cowmpound replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Snooki,

You an authority on action?

Just saying...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus_to_ground_control says:
Democracy Reigns!

The Middle East could be a region of spiritual, scientific, cultural and economic advancement if the governments there would reject the evil of taking their people hostages like North Korea.
reply
Jesus_to_ground_control replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Americab4Part you are right if it is done within one month.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sobobx says:
Republicans and Conservatives are so out of touch. The world is a different place than it was before the Internet. That's the most powerful "force" in the world today, not nuclear weapons. Most young Iranians like the freedom we have and even like us. We try to go to war with them, then they will all hate us. Conservatives think they were handed a defeat in the last election? Wait until the next one. Those old gray-haired McCain and Eastwood and those Just for Men haired Cantors and Ryans are REALLY going to see what losers they are. And before anybody calls me a weak-kneed liberal, I did a tour of duty int he Marine Corps. Not a chicken hawk like the majority of current "Conservatives."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
olddog47 says:
Dealing with Iran is like dealing with liberals, a no win situation.
reply
Cowmpound replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The liberals seem to be winning? Good or bad, seems to be the case.
GeneralJDavis replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, the crazy right-wing does seem to be in full retreat these days. Thank God.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
driftwood-ct says:
If it wasn't such a serious matter, this latest kowtow by a weakling administration would be the joke of the year. Let's go be nicy nice to a regime that regularly fantasizes about destroying the USA and all other democratic states and replacing them with a worldwide goose-steppin caliphate. Any more brilliant ideas?
reply
nonpolitico replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree driftwood-ct:
All this talk from Liberals criticising "right wing" and loving "left wing",
Anyone who`s ever flown can tell you an aircraft cannot fly with only one wing. Both wings co-operate to get and keep the aircraft airborne.
The fact is that in approx 60yrs, the world will be unrecognisable!
Anyone born during or just after WWII can tell you how it was in 1945, and looking back that now looks old fashioned and quaint!
You never know, the crazies doing all the exploding and mayhem may have equal rights with women by the time we reach 2073!
Time is supposed to heal all wounds. And it surely will, but mebbee not if USA gets into what Obama seems to be leading to... Real Socialism!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
break the ice between the U.S. and Iran through direct discussions
will have a positive impact on the discussions on the nuclear issue of Iran. The prospect of a deal is still possible.
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileycccc says:
What a great Vice President. Could you imagine Dick "shotgun" Cheney suggesting anything but WAR. Joe would be a shoe in, in 2016 unless Hillary decides to run.
reply
ugleyme replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good points. We need to give them a reason for cooperating; call it a bride if you will. But they are in the driver's seat ie they will have the bomb and are nuts enough to use it.

Kerry/Clinton is what I'd like to see in 2016.
pinetreewest replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kerry/Clinton. Thought about such a thing, but probably Clinton/Kerry. I think it might be too Secretary of Statey.
See all 53 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right