By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ January 24, 2013, 11:43 AM

Lawmakers unveil bill to ban assault weapons

Democratic lawmakers were joined by mayors, law enforcement officials and gun violence victims Thursday to introduce the first significant piece of gun control legislation to be put to Congress since the massacre in Newtown, Conn., that left 20 children and six adults dead at an elementary school: The "Assault Weapons Ban of 2013," which would ban many so-called assault weapons as well as high-capacity ammunition magazines.

Play Video

Feinstein lays out plan to "dry up" assault weapons supply

"Today we are introducing legislation that will help end the mass shootings that have devastated countless families and terrorized communities," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who said she is "incensed that our weak gun laws allow these mass killings to be carried out again, and again, and again in this country."

"And the last several years, the massacres were going on more and more," continued Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, whose husband was killed and son was injured in 1993 when a man opened fire on a commuter train. "And going through it, I kept saying, 'what's wrong with all of us? How many people have to be killed before we do something?'"

Among the lawmakers present were the two senators from Connecticut as well as members of the House representing Newtown and Aurora, Colo., where a mass shooting took place in a movie theater last July. Victims of gun violence came to the microphone one by one to discuss loved ones killed by gunfire and their experiences in mass shootings.

McCarthy, D-N.Y., said she has "watched the slaughter of so many people and I've met with so many victims over the years, and in Congress nobody wanted to touch the issue."

The bill would reinstate the 1994 assault weapons ban that lapsed in 2004, though with some tweaks: The 1994 ban, for example, defined an assault weapon as a gun that had two or more features or cosmetic accessories such as a pistol grip. The 2013 ban will limit those features to one, which Feinstein said would make it harder for assault weapons manufacturers to get around the law. The new bill would also not expire, as the 1994 bill did after 10 years.

Broadly, the legislation would prohibit 158 specifically named military-style firearms along with certain semiautomatic weapons; it would also outlaw ammunition magazines that accept more than 10 rounds. Americans would be able to keep affected weapons if the weapons were already in their possession when the bill was enacted, and exemptions would be made for specific hunting and sporting weapons, as well as antique or disabled weapons. (The new bill would require a background check for grandfathered weapons if they are sold or transferred.)

Ultimately, however, these details are not likely not to matter all that much. That's because there is little chance that the legislation will get through Congress.

Play Video

McCarthy on guns: "How many people have to be killed before we do something?"

Start with the Senate: Democrats control 55 out of 100 votes, and barring a more-significant-than-expected change to the filibuster rule, supporters of the gun control measure would need all of those votes -- plus five Republican votes -- to pass the bill. Those votes don't appear to be there. There is only one Republican in the Senate - Mark Kirk of Illinois - who supports an assault weapons ban. One Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, told the New York Times of an assault weapons ban this week, "I'm not there," and at least four other Democrats have declined to take a position. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has vacillated on even holding a vote on an assault weapons ban, presumably out of concern that the vote could damage vulnerable Democrats ahead of the 2014 election.

The odds are even worse in the GOP-led House, where only one Republican, Peter King of New York, has said he supports an assault weapons ban. That's fewer than the number of House Republicans who have raised the prospect of impeaching President Obama over his gun control efforts. (They are Steve Stockman and Louie Gohmert of Texas and Trey Radel of Florida.) House Speaker John Boehner, who could choose to simply not bring the bill up for a vote, said Tuesday that an assault weapons ban would give people "a false sense of security." In both chambers, the National Rifle Association has flexed its lobbying muscle in an effort to keep wavering pro-gun lawmakers from breaking ranks.

Mr. Obama called on Congress to pass the assault weapons and high-capacity magazine ban on Jan. 16, as well as a requirement for universal background checks for gun sales and other measures. Citing the horrific Newtown massacre one month earlier, the president said that "if there's even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there's even one life that can be saved, then we've got an obligation to try."

The White House opted not to send its own bill to Capitol Hill after Mr. Obama's announcement; it says it supports Feinstein's effort and has worked with her office in crafting the new version. Yet its hopes are likely pinned to what comes next: There are likely to be at least four pieces of major legislation introduced on gun control, according to a Democratic source, including a bill out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which starts hearings on gun control next week. Reid seemed most optimistic about that measure, telling reporters, "It may not be everything everyone wants, but I hope it has stuff that is really important."

Play Video

McCarthy on guns: "How many people have to be killed before we do something?"

If a gun control measure is going to get through Congress, it would likely combine the most popular proposals of gun control advocates - including universal background checks, which is backed by more than nine out of 10 Americans according to CBS News/New York Times polling - with moves to improve mental health screenings, which has been the focus of some Republicans. (Those who are following the debate closely would consider a ban on high-capacity magazines, backed by 63 percent of Americans, perhaps the biggest possible victory for gun control advocates.) With more than half of Americans saying they support an assault weapons ban, however, backers of the bill introduced today aren't giving up.

"I thought for sure, after Virginia Tech, we would get something done," said McCarthy. "Aurora. But something happened in Newtown. The people of America said, 'How could this happen? How could this happen to our children?'"

She added that Americans should not listen to arguments that nothing can be done to save lives, stating that roughly 1,000 people have been killed guns since Newtown.

"I'm telling you it can be done," she said. "I'm telling you with all my heart it can be done."

Caroline Horn contributed to this report.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
427 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jcsiii20 says:
People are forgetting about the shooting in Portland Oregon at the Clackamas Town Center just before the school shooting were a lone gunman that stole a gun started killing people. When his gun jammed, he saw he was being pursued by a man with a gun (a concealed carry permit holder), so he unjammed his gun then killed himself. Remember it is not the gun that kills people. People kill people. People will find a way to kill if they really want to, be it by a fire arm, bomb, blade, rock or hands. We need stricter laws on the owners of firearms (not restricting the firearms) such as:
1. If you allow your gun to be stolen (i.e. not keeping it secured in a gun safe or lock box) and the gun is used for a murder at the very least you should be brought up on manslaughter charges and loose the right to own fire arms. This would make people be more responsible for storing there fire arms and would help keep firearms out of the wrong hands.
2. To own a fire arm you must be signed off by 3 different entities:
a) Psychologist (min. 3 visits)with no bad mental or psychological tendencies to cause harm (not including hunting)
b) County sheriffs (background Checks)
c) a fire arms safety course that includes 3 day hand gun and rifle safety classroom training and 1 day range training(on hands live fire training by a NRA safety and firearms training specialist).
Once this is completed you are issued a permit similar to a concealed carry permit (i.e. owners permit showing that you have completed the above requirements this is required to purchase a firearm but does not stop the additional background check of the seller at time of purchase). Owner's permits are permanent but also come with a few extra laws (about safety and storage of firearms)
3. To carry concealed you should have to go to a specialized live fire range to prove to the sheriffs that you have the discernment to fire a weapon correctly in a public setting (similar to the police training target range where the different targets pop out of a man with a gun a lady with a bag of groceries, a kid on a scooter) a 1 day training class for using deadly force during the appropriate moment and only as a last resort.

It's not the weapons fault it's the person behind it.

The following info is to show a long history around firearms:
writen by James Stockwell - age 43 - Portland Oregon (around firearms all my life father is Mel Stockwell World and National Champian (twice each) gun slinger like Jessy James)
reply
oldfarts1944 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NO we dont need any stricter laws on guns. Law abiding firearm owners didnt do these crimes so why should they have to pay for it. And if guns get banned, that is going to start a civil war. So the best thing to do is enforce the laws thats already on the books and DO NOT make any new laws.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
curtis41 says:
I propose that we ban the following items. (If the bans do not pass congress, then they should be put into an executive order, thus bypassing Congress and the American people).

1. spoons - obviously the cause of obesity in the U.S. and a major health problem

2. pencils and pens - they are the cause of bad speling.

3. ban cars - they are used in bank robberies and the local 7-11 robberies and we should, therefore, ban their possession, use or non-federal financing

4. ban swimming pools - the are involved in many drownings of young children each year and are inherently unsafe

5. ban bicycles - the are the source of many injuries and deaths each year, so no child or adult should ever have a bicycle

6. ban criminals who commit gun crimes, they are irresponsible gun owners and should be incarcerated, hung, shot, electrocuted or chemically injected, depending on the gun laws in that particular state, that is, if that state is still sovereign, and not subject to executive fiat.
reply
HistoryNote replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
7. Ban Rutabaga. If you've ever tasted it, you'd agree.
logictoo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't think all autos should be banned, only the military type. Autos should be locked to such a degree it could not be stolen. If a thug steals a car and kills several in a drive-by then the car owner should be responsible not the thug because if the car were secure then the crime would not have taken place.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AnthonyinAR says:
It does not matter if 99% of the people want gun bans, the right to keep and bear arms is not to be infringed.

If you want a majority rule democracy, the US has been setting up democracys all over the world, however we are a republic, where a minority is protected against the foolish majority.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
curtis41 says:
What we have is an opportunistic gun-grab by the left and far left, to advance their agenda to disarm all Americans. The assault weapon ban did not reduce violent gun crimes over 10 years, yet Feinstein, et al. want to re-instate it anyway. The fact is law enforcement and legislators have been largely unable to stem gang and drug violent gun crimes, and want to pass even more, restrictive, ineffective gun laws. This gives the appearance of promoting public safety, at least under the guise of public safety. Contrary to other respondents, it is never a good trade of self-defense, constitution rights and personal freedom for some leftie's perceptions of public safety. They seem to forget we live in a constitutional republic. Let's wait and see if our President issues an executive order to continue the assault weapon ban, after Congress votes it down. It could be symbolic, in that it could be the magic "1000th" executive order, if that number has not yet been surpassed. Banning and restricting firearms for ordinary Americans is not a good solution in a free, open constitutional republic.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MRPAULGE0RGE says:
"Mass killings make up only about 1% of all murders and are on THE DECLINE."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/18/mass-killings-common/1778303/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GuitarJake5 says:
Congrats on chicogo last year. You banned pistols. Seems ligit, lower crime. Exept we are trying to tell you!!!!!! CRIMINALS WILL GET THERE GUNS YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!!!! so in result they ended up with the most murders in the U.S were Texus promoted gun laws. Congratulations on very few murdurs
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Romneyobamalite says:
We let the liberals and our government take prayer out of schools. We remove God from our homes. It gets to the point that people are even afraid to mention God's name and then we let the government blame our problems on guns.
What a sad shape we are in.
reply
AnthonyinAR replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@ slow news, Romneyobamalite said nothing about the pledge of allegiance. However if you are insinuating the founding fathers were not Christian you are horribly mistaken. Look up the mayflower compact, as a start on your path to truth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HistoryNote says:
If everyone was issued an assault weapon, would everyone be safer? Yes or No
reply
hokie123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes, only if you can find some ammo. The government has bought up enough, over the past couple of months, to shoot every American 5 times. All of this ammo was hollow points. They say it is to practice with. Yeah right!!!
hokie123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I've been trying to find an AR for over a month. I guess they bought up all of the AR's along with the ammo. I wish they would issue me one. Colt, S&W or Bushmaster anyone of them would be acceptable.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
outback_jackson says:
I-LOATHE-MYSELF replies: "Funny how all these mass shootings happened lately under Obama's watch".



First off bozo -- these mass shootings are NOT FUNNY at all!

Secondly, did you miss the worst school shooting in U.S. history at VA
Tech? That massacre happened on April 16, 2007, on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia, where 32 people were killed and 17 wounded.

That happened during bushworld, Einstein!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandy 1027 says:
We have to ask ourselves how many more people will have to die before Congress does anything.Every life won't be saved, but surely some would be.It seems that too many don't care unless it's their own loved one.We owe it to Gabby Giffords,the victims of Newtown, Aurora, and all of the senseless assault weapons shootings to not let their deaths be totally in vain by and enacting some common sense measures.The next victim could be any of us.
reply
RickB2400 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sandy, ...Your suggestions please ?
Rocket_USA replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We owe it to the thousand of Americans that fought and died for our constitution to not all the current hysteria to take away what they fought for.

If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might, in a moral point of view, justify revolution. - Abraham Lincoln
See all 7 Replies
See all 427 Comments