By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ January 23, 2013, 10:12 AM

Hillary Clinton on Benghazi: "I do feel responsible"

Play Video

Clinton: "I take responsibility" for Benghazi

Updated: 5:10 p.m. ET

Testifying before Congress for the first time since the September 11 attacks in Benghazi that left four Americans dead, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton today took responsibility for the failures that led to those deaths, citing a "personal" commitment to improving diplomatic security abroad. But even while conceding ongoing "deficiencies and inadequacies" within the State Department, Clinton defended her own actions and those of her staff with regard to their response to the violence, and outlined the numerous steps she says have already been implemented to prevent future similar occurrences.

Clinton, growing emotional at times during the course of her testimony, cited the inherent risk of taking an active diplomatic role in the global arena -- particularly in a moment in which "Arab revolutions have scrambled power dynamics and shattered security forces across the region." She lamented the loss of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three Americans who died in the September attacks, and spoke tearfully of having "stood next to President Obama as the Marines [who] carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews."

"I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the sons and daughters," she said. "And the wives left alone to raise their children."

Still, Clinton argued that diplomats "accept a level of risk" in taking posts in high-risk, and that they "cannot work in bunkers and do their jobs."

"So it is our responsibility to make sure they have the resources they need and to do everything we can to reduce the risks," she said.

In that vein, Clinton said, she has worked with the State Department to swiftly implement a series of outside recommendations aimed at ensuring that similar attacks don't occur in the future. She repeatedly stressed her responsibility for the personnel in Libya as well as in the State Department generally, and added that her commitment to protecting future diplomats stretches beyond a policy level.

Play Video

Hillary Clinton tears up talking about Benghazi victims

"As I have said many times, I take responsibility. And nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure," she said. "For me, it's personal."

Clinton called the attack in September "one of those terrible tragic times" when the State Department's security assessment of the situation failed to take into account an imminent attack, and she emphasized her commitment to increasing the department's efficacy and operational capabilities before she steps down in the coming months.

Play Video

Clinton: Sunday shows "not my favorite thing to do"

"We are constantly assessing. And sometimes we get it wrong, but it's very -- it's rare that we get it wrong," Clinton said. "This was one of those terrible tragic times when, you know, there was an assessment shared by the ambassador, shared by others, that turned out not to take into account the -- the militants attacking that night."

Clinton also said that while she had been broadly aware of security concerns in Benghazi, she had not personally reviewed an August 12 cable requesting reinforcements.

"With specific security requests they didn't come to me. I had no knowledge of them," she said. But Clinton noted that she was involved in a "constant conversation" about helping Libya overcome "a deteriorating" security environment as underwent post-Qaddafi governmental transitions.

"We sent teams out, both civilian and military experts to try to help them," she said, in response to a question from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., about Clinton's efforts to both assess and improve the security situation in Libya. "What I found with the Libyans was willingness, but not capacity... What we've been trying to do, and you know, we need your help to help us pay for what we're trying to do, we are trying to help them build a decent security force to try to reign in the militias as best they can. So this was a constant conversation."

Play Video

Clinton on Benghazi: "Of course it was a terrorist attack"

Even while Clinton conceded State Department shortcomings in the lead-up to the attacks, she strongly defended both her own response to the violence, as well as that of the White House and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. She was particularly dismissive of the controversy surrounding White House officials' early comments suggesting the attacks might have been the result of spontaneous protests spurred by an anti-Muslim video.

"We had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? At this point what difference does it make, Senator?" Clinton asked Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., when asked why the administration initially gave an inaccurate version of the events that took place.

In the aftermath of the attacks, much of the political controversy has surrounded Rice's September 16 television appearances, in which she suggested protests surrounding the video might have played a role in the attacks. Those comments, which turned out not to be true, were guided by a set of unclassified talking points given to Rice ahead of the appearances. Ahead of Rice's appearances, those talking points were edited to cut specific references to "al Qaeda" and "terrorism," and Republicans pounced on the discrepancies in an apparent campaign to derail Rice's bid to replace Clinton as Secretary of State.

Play Video

Clinton gets heated at Benghazi hearing


Clinton said she did not ask Rice to go on television following the attacks, but vehemently defended the ambassador's remarks in the appearances she did make. On the suggestion that Rice had knowingly misled the people on Benghazi, Clinton said "nothing could be further from the truth."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who was one of the lawmakers most critical of Rice and has relentlessly hammered the administration over Benghazi for months, lambasted the White House for not consulting with people on the ground in Libya before speaking publicly about what happened. In agitated remarks, he called Clinton's testimony "not satisfactory."

"Here we are, four months later, and we still don't have the basic information," McCain said.  

Clinton stated her disagreement with McCain on the administration's handling of its response before turning to budget concerns -- and the congressional holds on budget requests she suggested has infringed upon the State Department's ability to adequately do its job.

Play Video

Sen. Paul to Clinton: I'd have fired you over Benghazi

"We've had frequent congressional complaints. Why are we doing anything for Libya?" she said. "Currently, the House has holds on bilateral security assistance, on other kinds of support for anti- terrorism assistance. So we've got to get our act together between the administration and the Congress. If this is a priority and if we are serious about trying to help this government stand up security and deal with what is a very dangerous environment from east to west, then we have to work together."

Not everyone took Clinton at her word. Despite a pervading sense of respectfulness toward the outgoing Secretary of State at the hearing, including among Republicans, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., accused Clinton of accepting culpability "for the worst tragedy since 9/11." He also said he would have "relieved" her of her job had he been president at the time of the attacks.

"I would think by anybody's estimation, Libya has to be have been one of the hottest of hot spots around the world. Not to know of the request for securities really I think cost these people their lives," Paul said. "Their lives could have been saved had someone been more available, had someone been aware of these things, more on top of the job."

Play Video

GOP Rep.: Clinton let Benghazi consulate "become a death trap"

In the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing later in the day, Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., also accused Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of letting the U.S. consulate in Benghazi "become a death trap."

Pointing to the outside Accountability Review Board (ARB) report on what went wrong in Benghazi, Clinton noted in her response to Paul that "I am the secretary of state and the ARB made very clear that the level of responsibility for the failures that they outlined was set at the assistant secretary level and below." But she also suggested that his comments were  grounded in a political -- not diplomatic -- context.

"The reason we put into effect an accountability review board is to take it out of the heat of politics and partisanship and accusations, and to put it in the hands of people who have no stake in the outcome," Clinton said. "The reason I said 'make it open, tell the world' is because I believe in transparency. I believe in taking responsibility and I have done so. And I hope that we're going to be able to see a good working relationship between the State Department and the committee going forward."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Lucy Madison On Twitter »

    Lucy Madison is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

479 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
depressionbaby says:
It's beginning to look like the buck stopped a little short of Hillary.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rickcham says:
IT DOES MATTER! The American people were lied to because it was politically inconvenient. Sweeping it under the rug, then telling each other how great we are. Disgusting. 60 Minutes=obama lap dogs.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eroteme2 says:
"I do take responsibility." I do not take full responsibility altough my mainstream media has reported I did take full responsibility. I blame others. How could Hillary be responsibe? She knew little of what was going on in the Dept. While in office she has spent the majority of her time traveling from one country to another and over again, accomplishing nothing. but receiving 'credit' for her happy traveling.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Retired_in_Va says:
This whole inquisition is nothing but republican BS.

The people who take these jobs know the risk. I am sure the CIA and other Intelligence did not have any idea this was going to happen when U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens requested additional security.

Let us see, who was on duty when 911 happened? (Answer: republicans).
Who was on duty when Bin Laden got his just deserts? (Answer: not republicans).
How many other attacks have been prevented over the past few years? (Answer: quite a few).
Who cut funding to embassies for security and other issues? (answer: republicans)
How much info come into the Secretary of State each day? (Answer: probably a whole lot).
Do you think you would be able read every piece that comes in? (Answer: I do not think so).
Like Secretary of State Clinton said, "It does not matter how it happened, it matters that action is taken to prevent it from happening again".

Something the republicans cannot seem to grasp.

They are only interested in a witch hunt!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
raymailhot says:
Feeling responsible is not quite like the "Buck stops here"! These politicians are more and more sleazy each election! Hugging the parents and children to use later as political posturing?

Alligator tears are too apparent!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ronald_Chaves says:
Thanks Hillary for your contribution to a World of Peace.
We all hope you will post your name for US President,
next election yr 2018.
Ronald Chaves, Costa Rica
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
humen0007 says:
Taking responsibility without consequences seems to be the new American way.
When SOS Clinton embraced the families of the fallen did she say to them "I am so sorry, I f**ked up? She should have because she f**ked up. We still don't know why Stevens was there and why requests for backup were ignored. Many other questions remain.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
andie52 says:
The Benghazi consulate was not protected by the contingent of Marines that usually safeguard embassies and instead was guarded by Libyan and State Department security officers. It was considered to be 'an interim facility

'Ali Fetori, 59, an accountant who lives near the embassy, said: "The security people just all ran away and the people in charge were the young men with guns and bombs."

The consulate was vulnerable to attack because it did not have bulletproof glass, reinforced doors or other features common to embassies

The consulate had also established a series of "trip wires," classified benchmarks about intelligence on attack preparations or escalating unrest that would prompt the United States to evacuate the Benghazi compound. But the trip wires were not set off.

New security cameras with night-vision capability were shipped to the Benghazi compound but were still sitting in crates when the September attack occured

There are many facets of this attack that could not be controled by Clinton or the President
reply
zmonkee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"at this point....does it matter"? what a POS!!!
raymailhot replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
America has better things to worry about than the known incompetence of their federal government. We are suppose to hate the previous president, but he did maintain the foreign officers much better. Too bad he didn't do all the nice things this president does?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
outback_jackson says:
MONKEE replies: "At this point...does it really matter"?



Much like your buddy phil mickelson at torrey pines today -- tied for 90th!
reply
ccb5508 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think you are replying on the wrong forum, as Phil Mickelson is on another post-- Also....I still believe Phil Mickelson is receiving a lot of money to play there, no matter what place he comes in?
zmonkee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you're comparing hilary lying about the murder of 4 Americans to Phil Mickelson wanting to save money on taxes??? Reach much??
linkicon reporticon emailicon
167irishboy says:
If you take a job at a American embassy in Libya, you should know going into it that no amount of security or intelligence is going to stop you from being attacked. The people there in power and civilian are nuts, hate Americans, and have no problem sacrificing themselves to take out any American. That's hard to defend against.

All this is, is the Republican Party making themselves look like the Tea Party, get rid of government and go to mob rule, psychos that want to smear any respectable Democrat they can.

This is the same party that has members that have stated there is such a thing as legitimate rape. I refer to them as the "Dinosaur Party" since they are going to become extinct in future American elections.
reply
zmonkee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Does ANY of what you mention above make it OK for Hilary and others to go on TV and lie to America about the reason for the murders?
raymailhot replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They stood back and didn't respond! Where is all the infrastructure that was in place for the previous administration that stopped the attacks after 911? She started the Arab spring and where is it going? Why are there al Qaida in Libia? They are supposed to be defeated, not stronger!
See all 479 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right