Hillary Clinton on Benghazi: "I do feel responsible"
Clinton: "I take responsibility" for Benghazi
Updated: 5:10 p.m. ET
Testifying before Congress for the first time since the September 11 attacks in Benghazi that left four Americans dead, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton today took responsibility for the failures that led to those deaths, citing a "personal" commitment to improving diplomatic security abroad. But even while conceding ongoing "deficiencies and inadequacies" within the State Department, Clinton defended her own actions and those of her staff with regard to their response to the violence, and outlined the numerous steps she says have already been implemented to prevent future similar occurrences.
Clinton, growing emotional at times during the course of her testimony, cited the inherent risk of taking an active diplomatic role in the global arena -- particularly in a moment in which "Arab revolutions have scrambled power dynamics and shattered security forces across the region." She lamented the loss of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three Americans who died in the September attacks, and spoke tearfully of having "stood next to President Obama as the Marines [who] carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews."
"I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the sons and daughters," she said. "And the wives left alone to raise their children."
- Expert: Libya's security not better since Benghazi
- In final days as Secretary of State, Clinton faces Benghazi grilling
Still, Clinton argued that diplomats "accept a level of risk" in taking posts in high-risk, and that they "cannot work in bunkers and do their jobs."
"So it is our responsibility to make sure they have the resources they need and to do everything we can to reduce the risks," she said.
In that vein, Clinton said, she has worked with the State Department to swiftly implement a series of outside recommendations aimed at ensuring that similar attacks don't occur in the future. She repeatedly stressed her responsibility for the personnel in Libya as well as in the State Department generally, and added that her commitment to protecting future diplomats stretches beyond a policy level.
Hillary Clinton tears up talking about Benghazi victims
"As I have said many times, I take responsibility. And nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure," she said. "For me, it's personal."
Clinton called the attack in September "one of those terrible tragic times" when the State Department's security assessment of the situation failed to take into account an imminent attack, and she emphasized her commitment to increasing the department's efficacy and operational capabilities before she steps down in the coming months.
Clinton: Sunday shows "not my favorite thing to do"
"We are constantly assessing. And sometimes we get it wrong, but it's very -- it's rare that we get it wrong," Clinton said. "This was one of those terrible tragic times when, you know, there was an assessment shared by the ambassador, shared by others, that turned out not to take into account the -- the militants attacking that night."
Clinton also said that while she had been broadly aware of security concerns in Benghazi, she had not personally reviewed an August 12 cable requesting reinforcements.
"With specific security requests they didn't come to me. I had no knowledge of them," she said. But Clinton noted that she was involved in a "constant conversation" about helping Libya overcome "a deteriorating" security environment as underwent post-Qaddafi governmental transitions.
- In Benghazi hearing, State Dept. concedes "we have to do better"
- Graham calls for delay on WH's CIA nominee over Benghazi
- Timeline: How Benghazi attack, probe unfolded
"We sent teams out, both civilian and military experts to try to help them," she said, in response to a question from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., about Clinton's efforts to both assess and improve the security situation in Libya. "What I found with the Libyans was willingness, but not capacity... What we've been trying to do, and you know, we need your help to help us pay for what we're trying to do, we are trying to help them build a decent security force to try to reign in the militias as best they can. So this was a constant conversation."
Clinton on Benghazi: "Of course it was a terrorist attack"
Even while Clinton conceded State Department shortcomings in the lead-up to the attacks, she strongly defended both her own response to the violence, as well as that of the White House and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. She was particularly dismissive of the controversy surrounding White House officials' early comments suggesting the attacks might have been the result of spontaneous protests spurred by an anti-Muslim video.
"We had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? At this point what difference does it make, Senator?" Clinton asked Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., when asked why the administration initially gave an inaccurate version of the events that took place.
In the aftermath of the attacks, much of the political controversy has surrounded Rice's September 16 television appearances, in which she suggested protests surrounding the video might have played a role in the attacks. Those comments, which turned out not to be true, were guided by a set of unclassified talking points given to Rice ahead of the appearances. Ahead of Rice's appearances, those talking points were edited to cut specific references to "al Qaeda" and "terrorism," and Republicans pounced on the discrepancies in an apparent campaign to derail Rice's bid to replace Clinton as Secretary of State.
Clinton gets heated at Benghazi hearing
Clinton said she did not ask Rice to go on television following the attacks, but vehemently defended the ambassador's remarks in the appearances she did make. On the suggestion that Rice had knowingly misled the people on Benghazi, Clinton said "nothing could be further from the truth."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who was one of the lawmakers most critical of Rice and has relentlessly hammered the administration over Benghazi for months, lambasted the White House for not consulting with people on the ground in Libya before speaking publicly about what happened. In agitated remarks, he called Clinton's testimony "not satisfactory."
"Here we are, four months later, and we still don't have the basic information," McCain said.
Clinton stated her disagreement with McCain on the administration's handling of its response before turning to budget concerns -- and the congressional holds on budget requests she suggested has infringed upon the State Department's ability to adequately do its job.
Sen. Paul to Clinton: I'd have fired you over Benghazi
"We've had frequent congressional complaints. Why are we doing anything for Libya?" she said. "Currently, the House has holds on bilateral security assistance, on other kinds of support for anti- terrorism assistance. So we've got to get our act together between the administration and the Congress. If this is a priority and if we are serious about trying to help this government stand up security and deal with what is a very dangerous environment from east to west, then we have to work together."
Not everyone took Clinton at her word. Despite a pervading sense of respectfulness toward the outgoing Secretary of State at the hearing, including among Republicans, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., accused Clinton of accepting culpability "for the worst tragedy since 9/11." He also said he would have "relieved" her of her job had he been president at the time of the attacks.
"I would think by anybody's estimation, Libya has to be have been one of the hottest of hot spots around the world. Not to know of the request for securities really I think cost these people their lives," Paul said. "Their lives could have been saved had someone been more available, had someone been aware of these things, more on top of the job."
GOP Rep.: Clinton let Benghazi consulate "become a death trap"
In the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing later in the day, Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., also accused Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of letting the U.S. consulate in Benghazi "become a death trap."
Pointing to the outside Accountability Review Board (ARB) report on what went wrong in Benghazi, Clinton noted in her response to Paul that "I am the secretary of state and the ARB made very clear that the level of responsibility for the failures that they outlined was set at the assistant secretary level and below." But she also suggested that his comments were grounded in a political -- not diplomatic -- context.
"The reason we put into effect an accountability review board is to take it out of the heat of politics and partisanship and accusations, and to put it in the hands of people who have no stake in the outcome," Clinton said. "The reason I said 'make it open, tell the world' is because I believe in transparency. I believe in taking responsibility and I have done so. And I hope that we're going to be able to see a good working relationship between the State Department and the committee going forward."
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 277 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 346 Comments
- FBI seeks anonymous source behind Menendez allegations
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 253 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 216 Comments
- House GOP to vote on Obamacare repeal - Vol. 37 928 Comments
- Immigration deal reached in House
- Obama: I didn't know about IRS report 608 Comments
The people who take these jobs know the risk. I am sure the CIA and other Intelligence did not have any idea this was going to happen when U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens requested additional security.
Let us see, who was on duty when 911 happened? (Answer: republicans).
Who was on duty when Bin Laden got his just deserts? (Answer: not republicans).
How many other attacks have been prevented over the past few years? (Answer: quite a few).
Who cut funding to embassies for security and other issues? (answer: republicans)
How much info come into the Secretary of State each day? (Answer: probably a whole lot).
Do you think you would be able read every piece that comes in? (Answer: I do not think so).
Like Secretary of State Clinton said, "It does not matter how it happened, it matters that action is taken to prevent it from happening again".
Something the republicans cannot seem to grasp.
They are only interested in a witch hunt!!
Alligator tears are too apparent!
We all hope you will post your name for US President,
next election yr 2018.
Ronald Chaves, Costa Rica
When SOS Clinton embraced the families of the fallen did she say to them "I am so sorry, I f**ked up? She should have because she f**ked up. We still don't know why Stevens was there and why requests for backup were ignored. Many other questions remain.
'Ali Fetori, 59, an accountant who lives near the embassy, said: "The security people just all ran away and the people in charge were the young men with guns and bombs."
The consulate was vulnerable to attack because it did not have bulletproof glass, reinforced doors or other features common to embassies
The consulate had also established a series of "trip wires," classified benchmarks about intelligence on attack preparations or escalating unrest that would prompt the United States to evacuate the Benghazi compound. But the trip wires were not set off.
New security cameras with night-vision capability were shipped to the Benghazi compound but were still sitting in crates when the September attack occured
There are many facets of this attack that could not be controled by Clinton or the President
Much like your buddy phil mickelson at torrey pines today -- tied for 90th!
All this is, is the Republican Party making themselves look like the Tea Party, get rid of government and go to mob rule, psychos that want to smear any respectable Democrat they can.
This is the same party that has members that have stated there is such a thing as legitimate rape. I refer to them as the "Dinosaur Party" since they are going to become extinct in future American elections.