prev
next
Billions in Sandy aid package headed elsewhere
Men repair a home damaged by superstorm Sandy next to a one that is collapsed, on New York's Rockaway Peninsula, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012. / AP Photo/Seth Wenig
WASHINGTON Conservatives and watchdog groups are mounting a "not-so-fast" campaign against a $50.7 billion Superstorm Sandy aid package that Northeastern governors and lawmakers hope to push through the House this coming week.
Jersey shore town's Sandy recovery starts at the boardwalk
Their complaint is that lots of that money actually will go toward recovery efforts for past disasters and other projects unrelated to the late-October storm.
The measure bill includes $150 million for what the Commerce Department described as fisheries disasters in Alaska, Mississippi and the Northeast, and $50 million in subsidies for replanting trees on private land damaged by wildfires.
The objections have led senior House Republicans to assemble a $17 billion proposal, that when combined already approved money for flood insurance claims, is less than half what President Barack Obama sought and the Senate passed in December.
House Speaker John Boehner intends to let the House vote on both measures. He's responding both to conservatives who are opposed to more deficit spending, and to Govs. Andrew Cuomo, D-N.Y., and Chris Christie, R-N.J., who are irate that the House hasn't acted sooner.
The $17 billion package will be brought to the floor by the House Appropriations Committee, and Northeast lawmakers will have a chance to add $33.7 billion more.
- Rebuilding the heart of Belmar, N.J.: The boardwalk
- Sandy panel suggests floodgates, shelters for N.Y.
- Sandy prompts some seniors to seek assisted living
- Obama signs Sandy aid bill
Critics are taking the sharpest aim at $12.1 billion in the amendment for Department of Housing and Urban Development emergency block grants. Any state struck by a federally declared major disaster in 2011, 2012 or this year would qualify for the grants, and that's just about all the states, said Stephen Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group. Only South Carolina, Arizona and Michigan would not qualify, he said.
"That's not a bad chunk of change, particularly if you are trying to get other lawmakers to vote for the bill," Ellis said.
State and local governments like block grants because they provide more flexibility in how the money is spent. The money can go toward a variety of needs, including hospitals, utilities, roads, small businesses and rent subsidies.
The Northeast lawmakers' $33.7 billion amendment also includes more than $135 million to help the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration improve weather forecasting.
"A lot of the money goes to government agencies to rebuild rather than helping people actually afflicted by Sandy," Ellis said.
Before getting to the aid measures, the House on Monday planned to consider legislation intended to streamline Federal Emergency Management Agency regulations that critics blame for slowing down recovery efforts. That bill would let FEMA make limited repairs instead of lease payments to provide housing that might be less expensive than traditional agency trailers.
A $60.4 billion storm aid package passed by the Senate in December included $188 million for an Amtrak expansion project with an indirect link to Sandy: Officials say that new, long-planned tunnels from New Jersey to Penn Station in Manhattan would be better protected against future flooding.
The Club for Growth, a conservative group, complained the Senate bill was overpriced, full of pork and would swell the federal deficit because other government programs weren't being cut to cover the costs of the legislation. That bill expired with the old Congress on Jan. 3. So whatever additional aid package the House passes would have to go back to the Senate for its approval.
Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, two frequent critics of government spending, tried unsuccessfully to strip the Senate version of $125 million for an Agriculture Department program to restore watersheds damaged by wildfires and drought, $2 million for roof repairs at Smithsonian Institution museums in the Washington area and the $50 million in tree planting subsidies.
McCain also targeted $15 million to repair storm-damaged NASA facilities, saying the agency had called its Sandy damage "minimal."
"An emergency funding bill should focus on the emergency needs of the victims, not the needs of politicians," said Indiana Sen. Dan Coats, the senior Republican on Senate Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security. "Loading up a massive $60.4 billion package with unrelated projects and earmarks for other states is not the way we should use taxpayer dollars."
- no previous page
- next
1/2
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 155 Comments
- The 4 remaining Supreme Court cases to watch
- Next up for Obama: Major effort on climate change
- Michelle Obama and daughters tour Berlin Play Video
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities 77 Comments
- Senate deal seen near on key aspect of immigration reform
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 604 Comments
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
I do not understand liberal thinking, just to prove a point, you will spend yourself into bankruptcy. It's not a matter of point, we need to pull back on spending and that means cuts to every facet in the system. People are going to have to go back to work no matter how menial the job is. And the illegals ARE taking jobs people want, kick them out to make room for the ones living off the system.
Liberals only adhere to the constitution when it suits them. Want to change gun laws, put it to a vote in the Senate and Congress, if the bill passes BOTH houses with 3/4's of the votes, we have a new Amendment. That is how the system works.
Second amendment is ignored, but when the dumacrats want to raise the debt ceiling and bypass congress, they try to twist the intention of the 14th amendment.
Stop trying to spend money, A hurricane Sandy bill should ONLY pay for the damage from hurricane Sandy.
I don't know how you run your household, but mine is within my fiscal budget with a surplus.
Why does the rest of America owe a periodic large payment to people living on the coast?
How about coastal people buy insurance and leave the rest of us alone?
Why does the rest of America owe a periodic large payment to people living in the heartland?
See how it works?
It is inconceivable to direct these aid elsewhere, while thousands of people are on the street. These grants are aimed above all for victim disaster.
"au revoir"
------------------------------------------
hence why all the pork is in the bill ... to feed the mouths of all the pigs that stand at the trough all day long ... trading their votes for their own selfish consideration ... then complaining publicly about all the overspending in washington ... and how we have to do something about that.
just give everyone one of those trillion dollar coins ... that ought to cover all their open issues.