
White House press secretary Jay Carney listens to a follow up question regarding the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., after he told reporters that President Barack Obama is receiving updates on the situation, Friday, Dec. 14, 2012, during the daily press briefing at the White House in Washington, D.C. / AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
Updated 3:50 p.m. ET
After news broke about the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that renewing the federal assault weapons ban "does remain a commitment of" the president's. However, he continued, "What I said is that today is not the day to, I believe, as a father a day to engage in the usual Washington policy debates. I think that that day will come, but today is not that day."
Carney said that Mr. Obama was first notified of the shooting at 10:30 a.m. by Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan. The shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School this morning left 27 people dead, including at least 18 children ages five to 10 years old.
Carney: There's a day for gun control review, "but today is not that day"
Carney: Newtown shooting will "weigh heavily" on Obama "as a father"
The president called Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy, the governor's office said today, to express his condolences and pledge whatever resources the federal government can bring to bear to assist the families and the investigation. According to the White House, the president also spoke with FBI Director Robert Mueller about the incident, and the FBI providing support to state and local police.
Carney told reporters around noon that "it's certainly possible, if not likely, that the president will have something to say," in a written statement or otherwise.
"We are still waiting for more information about the incident in Connecticut," Carney said. "As we do, I think it's important, on a day like today, to view this as I know the president, as a father, does, and others who are parents certainly do: which is to feel enormous sympathy for those families affected and to do everything that we can to support state and local law enforcement and to support those who are enduring what appears to be a very tragic event."
1) lack of knowledge and treatment of mental health issues. This is the common denominator. The experts need to teach us, the nation needs to listen. Ignoring, heads in the sand, your problem not mine........not working folks. It is misunderstood folks, there is help and hope.
2) if you have someone in your home that is mentally unstable, get the guns out. Just get the guns out.
Invasion of privacy? Yep, but those with diagnosis of mental health care issues should not be able to buy a gun, it's for their safety and yours. There must be a way to accomplish it.
The National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the Hughes Amendment in 1986 have all placed limits on how automatic guns can be bought and sold, but did not make it illegal to possess them entirely.
Purchasing one requires submitting fingerprints and photographs to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, going through an FBI criminal background check, and paying a $200 tax, among other requirements. Only automatic weapons manufactured and registered with the federal government before 1986 can be bought, owned and sold.
If this info is correct it should give ban guns completely folks at least an idea that you cannot go to your local Wal-Mart sporting goods department and fork over your money and walk out with a weapon that is capable of firing full automatic.
God Bless to all and may the love of are father comfort you, and know that the lost are safe in the arms of our father in heaven
My understanding is very different from yours. I at one time carried a M-16, it was not a fully automatic weapon. Each squad leader carried one with a selector switch and could be fired full or semi automatic. Automatic weapons as you describe have been illegal in the US for years. Semi-automatic are legal. The semi-automatic M-16 is an excellent hunting rifle, very accurate and lightweight. Mine carried .223 bullet. I also carried an M-1 Garand, they were used in WWII and Korea. The M-I fired a 30.06 cartridge, a much larger cartridge than the M-16. If a weapon has to be full automatic to be considered assault then an assault weapon or rifle is illegal to own in the United States. You are correct that a full automatic rifle is not any good for hunting. Not only are they no good for hunting but if you were caught hunting with one it would be confiscated and you would like pay a huge fine and also very likey spend some time in jail. It would be a very serious offense. If you are correct and a assault weapon is a full automatic weapon then they are already outlawed.
But an assault rifle ban is nonsense, and just the President playing politics. The weapon used here, an AR, is not an assault rifle, and is no different than semi-autos that hunters have been using for more than eighty years. But because it LOOKS like an M16, because it LOOKS scary to those who know nothing about weapons, it's the favorite target of know nothing anti gun people, and this also makes it a favorite target of Obama. It's nothing more than a way of appeasing liberal Democrats. It is not base din reality.
And it isn't going to happen in any meaningful way. We live in a society that raises monsters, and then blame the tools the monster uses because that easier than facing the truth and changing society.
They can be carried by one person running in an assault formation toward an enemy, unlike many of the old machine guns that had to be mounted on the ground or to heavy to carry during a running assult. Their light weight and intense fire power is the key... They were designed to kill hundreds in minutes for military combat-not freaking hunting, personal or domestic protection; unless the domestic invader is freaking 100 man army regiment..
They are deadly killers on a massive scale...