By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ December 11, 2012, 6:13 PM

Right-to-work signed into law in Michigan

Updated 6:04 p.m. Eastern Time

Against a backdrop of raucous protests in the Michigan capitol, Republican Gov. Rick Snyder signed into law controversial right-to-work legislation after final passage in the GOP-led state legislature.

Play Video

Tens of thousands protest right-to-work in Mich.

The Michigan house passed two right-to-work laws earlier in the day - one focused on public sector workers, and one focused on private-sector workers - as protesters supporting unions chanted "shame on you" and "union busting is disgusting." The bills passed the Republican-led Michigan Senate last week, and Snyder signed them late Tuesday.

Right-to-work legislation, which is currently in place in 23 states, prevents agreements in which employees are required to pay union dues. American workers can't be forced to join unions, but many unions and companies have agreements in which all employees must pay union dues.

Right-to-work laws make such agreements illegal. Proponents say they give workers more freedom and are good for business; opponents say they are designed to shrink unions so they have less leverage in fighting for better wages, benefits and working conditions.

President Obama on Monday called the Michigan legislation "right to work for less money" and said lawmakers shouldn't be trying "to take away your right to bargain for better wages."

But Michigan Republican Gov. Rick Snyder, who long maintained that right-to-work was not on his agenda, has been adamant in his support for the legislation, which he says will create jobs. "It's about being pro-worker, it's about giving freedom of choice to workers," Snyder told MSNBC.

MLive reported Tuesday that an estimated 10,000 protesters descended on the Capitol Tuesday morning, with state police limiting access to the Capitol building after it reached its 2,000 person capacity.

Though most protesters opposed right-to-work, there were some supporters present as well -- many affiliated with the conservative advocacy group Americans for Prosperity. The Michigan branch of that group said in a statement that the legislation reflected "a pro-growth policy that can and will help to turn Michigan's economy around." The tent erected by Americans for Prosperity at the protests was torn down by opponents of the legislation.

Before Snyder signed the legislation, Michigan state Rep. Douglas Geiss said Tuesday that "there will be blood" if they become law.

"We are going to undo 100 years of labor relations," Geiss said.

Play Video

Obama takes on union fight in Michigan

The Michigan House Speaker, Republican Jase Bolger, said the legislation was about helping workers, not hurting them.

"This is not about Republicans versus Democrats," he said, according to MLive. "This is not about management versus labor. ... This is not about the past. This is about the future. ... Today is a game-changer - for Michigan, for its workers, and for our future."

The legislation is particularly significant in Michigan because it is considered the symbolic heart of the labor movement. "Sit down" strikes in Flint in the 1930s launched the United Auto Workers as a major power and led to the unionization of the U.S. auto industry.

Right-to-work opponents fear that passage in Michigan will spur moves to pass such laws in states like Wisconsin and Ohio that will further weaken an already sputtering labor movement. Over the past half-century, the percentage of American workers in a union has declined from 30 percent to less than 12 percent.

Rev. Jesse Jackson was among the protesters who sat on the floor of the Capitol building during the House votes. After the bill passed, protesters chanted "veto" and "the people united will never be defeated" as state troopers guarded entrances to the House and Senate chambers. Outside, protesters held signs reading "union strength is a family value," while inside they sang "solidarity." The Detroit Free Press reported that a trooper used pepper spray on one protester outside the Capitol.

Unions are vowing to consider pursuing recall bids against lawmakers who voted for the bill, including Snyder. That could mean a repeat of the recall fight that took place after Wisconsin passed controversial anti-union measures last year, though the first-term governor already faces reelection in 2014.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
529 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WhereisOT says:
So the trash at faux news is announcing "alert alert" bs for a "manhunt"..
For the loser getting smacked in the big mouth...lol

Why the hypocrisy...the terrorists over at the nra are fine with it...
"A little thump therapy never hurt anybody" clel baudler
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BuckeyeChuck says:
The right to work issue is very typical of republican thinking, it is basically giving people the benefits of union dues with out paying them.

It is the same as the republicans think of taxes, they want to live in a country where taxes have given them a good standard of living, but they don't want to pay the taxes. They simply want to freeload off the people that have already paid taxes.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
IPonUall2 says:
These devisive laws being passed in the manufacturing belt of America is another blow to the middle class which this legislation attacks, not help.
The Republicans are going to be in for a major turn in 2 possible ways in the near and not so distant future...
1. They will be rode out on a rail next election.
2. Their continual attacks on the middle class will cause a reaction of violence the kind the nation hasn't seen since the civil war.

America I implore you to wake up and do your duty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quantum_analysis says:
TEA_BENDER says: "I enjoy reading most of the post on this forum."

--------------


I'm sure you do, especially the repeats of the mackinaw right-wing stink tank and the AFP teabagging extremists that are just doing the koch heads dirty work, and turning America into a 3rd world country just as fast as they can!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quantum_analysis says:
CLERIC77 says: " During a protest against right-to-work legislation in Michigan's capital, Tarver's catering supplies were destroyed when demonstrators tore down the tent where he was serving and trampled his gear."

-------------------


That's what happens to ignorant people near an anti-union, AFP teabagging tent setup to incite the obviously upset union protesters. The protesters should have tarred and feathered all the ignorant teabagging extremists and any fox nooz commentators in sight, and run them out of town forever!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quantum_analysis says:
It was easy to see this plan to make Michigan the 24th right-to-work state was long brewing. With 17.5 percent union density, the fifth-highest in the country, and a record of voting for Democratic presidents, Michigan was a tempting target for such billionaire-funded national groups as Americans for Prosperity (the Koch brothers) and for the state's home-grown billionaire, Richard DeVos of the Amway fortune.

The Americans for Prosperity's Michigan chapter quadrupled its spending in 2010, the year Snyder was elected, to $1.1 million. The Mackinac Center, a longtime right-wing think tank in the state, spent $5.7 million last year, and stepped up its game last week to support Snyder's move. DeVos funds both groups.

It was the AFP bozos and a fox nooz commentator that instigated the fight that fox looped over and over again, calling them union "thugs" as usual, and inciting the fox parrots like mortified and gentzer0!
reply
bbglow replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's the next election that will be interesting ...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quantum_analysis says:
georgina rudely says: "over the last four years the banks have had to make sacrifices, businesses have all made sacrifices with years of little to no profit"

----------------


Give us a break georgina, since banks and corporations have been making RECORD PROFITS the last few years, and with record amounts of corporate welfare and bank bailouts by the U.S. taxpayers, it's about time we started taking care of the middle class and SMALL businesses, and force our dysfunctional congresscritters to pass middle class tax cuts for the 98%.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JSwisshelm says:
To all of you in your 20's, 30's, and 40's. This country is ruled by corporations who own our politicians. By the time they get done with us, you will spend your life working for $7 - $12 per hour, have no healthcare coverage, have no pension or retirement plan, no paid vacation, sick time or paid holidays, and work 6 days a week. You will work until the day you die, like Americans did in the 19th century. The corporate moguls have scared you into believing everything they say about unions, Democrats, and President Obama. Sucks to be you.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Think4times says:
I wonder if violence in protests would decrease if there was a law put in place that you must leave 10 feet of space between protesters and supporters. and at least 3 feet of space from the media.

I'm sure it sounds weird.. but I think it makes sense, because it's "personal space" being invaded that usually starts the violence.

Similar to a brother and sister fighting, and the mom tells the brother "leave your sister alone", and the brother gets within an inch while taunting "I'm not touching you"

People love to push the boundaries of personal space just for the purpose of intimidation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MidRoadAlone says:
It's amazing the level of ignorance the liberals on this site continue to display.

Making statements that the violence was by individuals planted by conservatives. Or that conservatives provoked he Union members.

The truth is, Unions are run by mobsters who prvoke thier buffoon thug membership into violence. You see it during strikes all of the time - I saw it at GE during strikes there.

Union members are mostly ignorant, unskilled workers who aren't worth the money or benefits they receive, so they have to fight and intimidate to get their way. That's why they are willing to bust the heads of anyone, even handicapped people in wheelchairs, to get their way.

This same theme repeats throughout liberal land, whether it's Unions ot the Occupy movement.
reply
RonnieHonduras replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zanes -- your husband's wages should be determined by just how skilled he is, not by some arbitrary union agreement that holds him down from how excellent he is.

As for union violence, don't be silly. I live in Pittsburgh and have seen the thuggery first hand, in the 70s, 80s, etc. It's that stupid mentality -- one guy is the ladder carrier, another guy is the ladder raiser, and another guy is the ladder lower, requiring three guys, minimum 3 hours each per job -- is the kind of idiocy I've seen defended, and the kind of stuff they bust up peoples' cars and threaten with bats if they cross a picket line when they're striking to protect.

Maybe if unions wised up a bit, they'd not be so hated by non union members who actually know that through hard work and desire you achieve and get higher wages, vs. dealing with 9as I've seen and heard countless times) the mentality of being criticized for working too hard. Actually have heard the phrase as a thinly veiled threat, "Buddy. You trying to make the rest of us look bad?"

Thugs. You and your husband should disavow / disassociate immediately.
See all 529 Comments