Obama back on the road with "fiscal cliff" pitch
President Barack Obama gestures as he speaks to workers about the economy during a visit to Daimler Detroit Diesel in Redford, Mich., Monday, Dec. 10, 2012. / AP Photo/Paul Sancya
Amid ongoing closed-door talks between Republicans and Democrats over a compromise to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff," President Obama today headed to Michigan as part of a continued effort to rally the public around his plan, which would raise taxes on the top two percent of American households.
With less than a month to go before the U.S. is slated to go over the "cliff" -- a series of tax hikes and spending cuts set to start kicking in early next year -- the president is increasingly turning to campaign-style tactics as a means to achieve his legislative goals in the face of GOP opposition: Today's visit to Michigan marked another of several recent rallies aimed at ginning up public support for his plan, and Obama supporters received distinctly campaign-like emails today encouraging them to "reach out to fellow Obama supporters and make sure they contact their Republican representative" on the issue.
Outwardly, little progress appears to have been made in the negotiations, given that neither side has yet agreed to budge on the key sticking point: Whether or not the Bush-era tax cuts should be extended for the top two percent of Americans. But there are some signs of possible movement. Mr. Obama met with Boehner yesterday at the White House, and White House spokesperson Jay Carney says the "lines of communication remain open" following that meeting.
Obama on "fiscal cliff": "I'm willing to compromise a little bit"
"The president does believe that we can reach an agreement," Carney told reporters today in a briefing on Air Force One as the president traveled to Michigan.
Visiting Daimler's diesel engine producer Detroit Diesel today, Mr. Obama underscored that the company's recent success -- Mr. Obama announced a new $120 million investment that will result in "115 good new union jobs" -- as evidence that his own policies from the last four years are working.
"I placed my bet on American workers. We bet on American ingenuity," Mr. Obama said. "I'd make that same bet any day of the week. Three and a half years later, that bet is paying off... The American auto industry is back."
But he warned that any recent economic progress could be hampered if Congress "doesn't act soon" to pass a bill to deal with the "cliff," and that middle-class families will be stuck with a tax hike starting in the new year, when a package of Bush-era tax cuts are set to expire.
"If Congress doesn't act soon, meaning in the next few weeks, starting on January 1st everybody's going to see their incomes taxes go up," he told the crowd. "A typical middle-class family of four will see an income tax hike of around $2,200. How many of you can afford to pay another $2,200 in taxes?"
"I didn't think so," he said, after someone in the audience cried out, "Not me!"
Mr. Obama, as he has done repeatedly in the past several weeks, proceeded to outline his own "balanced" plan, which includes extending the Bush-era reductions for 98 percent of Americans while raising them on income of $250,000 or more.
"We can solve this problem. All Congress needs to do is pass a law that would prevent a tax hike on the first $250,000 of everybody's income," he said. "When you put it all together, what you need is a package that keeps taxes where they are for middle class families, we make some tough spending cuts on things that we don't need, and then we ask the wealthiest Americans to pay a slightly higher tax rate."
On that principle, he stressed, "I won't compromise."
"I'm not going to have a situation where the wealthiest among us, including folks like me, get to keep all our tax breaks, and then we're asking students to pay higher student loans," he said. "Or, you know, suddenly, you know, a school doesn't have school books because the school district couldn't afford it. Or some family that has a disabled kid isn't getting help that they need through Medicaid. We're not going to do that, we're not going to make that trade-off. That's not going to help us to grow."
Whether and to what extent Boehner will agree to that position remains the primary point of political interest in the negotiations. So far, both the White House and the speaker's office remain mum on the question.
"Discussions with the White House are taking place, but we have no detail to share about the substance of those conversations," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said today in a statement. "The Republican offer made last week remains the Republican offer, and we continue to wait for the president to identify the spending cuts he's willing to make as part of the 'balanced' approach he promised the American people."
Popular in Politics
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 413 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 438 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 116 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 218 Comments
Yes, he has to eat crow very soon, and every one knows he will not do that smilingly but crying like a baby. WATCH FOR HIS CRY LIVE ON FRIDAY 12 NOON (EST).
But, what I haven't heard is what is your projected deficit in years 1 through 4. I don't need a 10 year projection, you aren't going to be in office that long. Also, when you talk about Medicare cuts, you mention it is in the reimbursements. Are these the same reimbursements that Congress votes to repeal each year (i.e. the "Doc Fix")?
I know you want to have the masses love you, but have you ever thought about telling them the truth? Tell them what your plan will do to the deficit AND the debt. Ask them if they are willing to be free of pain now so that their children and grandchildren will live in a US that looks more like Greece than it does today. And why don't you define "fair share" a little better? Isn't shared sacrifice (i.e., returning to the Clinton tax rates for EVERYONE) a better solution? If it wasn't, why did you sign it into law, which will go into effect in 20 days?
Personally, I think it was one of your best moves. Blame it on whomever, but between raising taxes on everyone and the sequestration cuts, we are going to be a lot closer to a balanced budget than either your plan or the GOP plan.
A123 Systems, the company making electrical car batteries that received $249 million in Federal stimulus money, was sold today, to the Chineese. So money we have borrowed and still owe, was invested in a company that went broke. I believe the state of Michigan invested another $140 million in the company that filed for bankruptcy last Oct. America lost on that one.
Taxes don't need to be increased. Government spending needs to calm down. It's not a free for all.
Obama won the election. He won the Electoral College. He won decisively by popular vote. More people like him than you..........
.........So.......quit acting like rich spoiled brats and work with the other side like you claim you do and solve this fiscal problem fairly......not in the best way of the money that put you in office
Keep it up until Boehner / Ryan quit squealing and just pass these needed measures.