One way to pass farm bill: Attach it to fiscal cliff

The most realistic avenue to getting members of Congress to act on the urgency of a new farm bill before U.S. shoppers begin to find products like milk on supermarket shelves at ludicrous prices, some experts say, is to bundle it with the one thing on everyone's mind as the year comes to an end: the so-called "fiscal cliff."

Since Oct. 1, when the 2008 agriculture law expired with the House and Senate unable to agree on an extension, U.S. farm rules have technically been operating under a 1949 "permanent" law. Because the 2008 law covered all crops planted in 2012, and federal funding for many agricultural programs is assured through March 2013, impacts of the default have - with some exceptions, like supplemental payments for dairy farmers - gone largely unnoticed. 

• As farm law expires, its future uncertain
• Four things to watch during the lame duck Congress

But that grace period ends Jan. 1, when consumers will begin to see everyday shopping list items spike to outrageous prices, with the implementation of incompatible regulations created 64 years ago. And, as Cornell University professor of agricultural economics Andrew Novakovic suggested, in the meantime Congress' attention may be otherwise occupied by the "fiscal cliff," a series of tax hikes and spending cuts set to go into effect the first of the year, which could hurl the United States into a dangerous recession.

"Tough situation in D.C.," Novakovic wrote in an email when asked about the most likely outcome for farm legislation. "Almost anything remains possible and I wouldn't bet a lot either for or against any outcome, but prospects for a proper farm bill before the end of the year are not good. I'm pretty sure if Congress can't come up with an agreement for a 'fiscal balloon' they won't be able to or inclined to do anything with a new farm bill."

In its own right, the "fiscal cliff" has for months stumped congressional leaders who, due to a split body and unprecedented Washington gridlock, have been unable to move beyond the impasse created by whether or not to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the top two percent of wealthiest Americans. But House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who post-election has been in talks with President Obama and Senate Democrats, said he's confident they'll avert a tumble into recession - and also reportedly told House Agriculture Committee Chair Frank Lucas, R-Okla., a farm bill could be part of the solution.

"He assured me that was on their agenda and gave me the impression that it was one of the issues that will be addressed in the big picture sense...I assume he means sequestration and taxes," Lucas told Politico last week. "When the speaker answered my question, the way he acted, led me to believe - I'll put it that way -that they are focused on the big picture and this is one of those elements. No more specifics than that."

Lucas continued: "Whether it is part of the 'bridge' - he's used that phrase before - to the ultimate thing I don't know," Lucas said, adding of the bill's savings, which could be calculated into required spending cuts Jan. 1: "Clearly our $35 billion in the House package in savings has gotten somebody's attention."

The House farm bill, approved by Lucas' committee in July, never made it through the GOP-controlled chamber, due primarily to disagreements over how deeply to cut food stamps. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed its version - the "Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012" - in June.

A spokesperson for the House Agriculture Committee confirmed to CBSNews.com it's "possible a farm bill could be part of a larger year-end package." Ranking members of both congressional chambers' committees, though, insist they're resolute to pass not just an extension of a prior farm program, but an entirely new law.

"I am absolutely, 110 percent against a one-year extension, and I will do everything in my power to stop it," Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., the ranking Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, said in an interview with AgriTalk radio. Peterson said he is "still hopeful" the full, five-year plan can get through Congress: "I really think they want to get this off their plate by the end of the year," he said.

Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., ranking Republican on the Senate Agriculture Committee, agreed: "Some way, somehow, we need to get a five-year farm bill passed," he told Politico. "There are an awful lot of farmers and ranchers and their lenders out there now who are sort of in financial purgatory."

In addition to controlling market goods pricing and supplemental product payments, the farm law covers funding for, among other things, food stamps, conservation efforts, crop insurance, and natural disaster assistance.

[AOCGUY]

No No No No.

It is time to stop this madness. Cr@p like this is why we are in this fiscal dilemma in the first place. Every bill should be a single issue, no riders, hidden agenda, etc. And associated with every bill should be a clear statement and committment on how to pay for it. Congress wnats to subsidize wheat production - fine pass a wheat subsidy bill with and identify exactly how they plan on paying for it. The bill should also have a specified time as to when expected benefits to the American people (not just the farmers) should kick in. Failute to meet that target should mean automatic and permanent expiration of the bill.

[WHAT-IS-HE-SMOKING]

Such a deal, if your company (the farm) does not make enough money from you product, then federal government will give you money.

[shurch4truth]

CALLING ALL AWARE CITIZENS!

For your good and the good of the U.S.A. do not forget that under George W. Bush the economy crashed because the Republicans said if you don't tax the rich it will trickle down. Guess what it did not work. The economy crashed. Guess what else? They want to do it again.

Why? Because Republicans get their campaign funding from the rich,

[Venificia]

And just who do you think the Demo's get their money from Poor people on food stamps. Stupid statement. Unless of course poor folks can aford 35,000 dinners with Barry.

[hdc77494]

Why do we have a massive subsidy program for one class of workers at the expense of everyone else? Why aren't their products being sold in stores at the prices they will bear? Especially when you include the massive corn subsidy that hurts livestock producers. It's all political power being doled out for votes using our money.

[Mike239239]

This is not for a class of workers it is for corporate farm. Just more welfare for the wealthy.

[waygone]

They should change the name to "The American Food Bill". Everybody thinks this only affects farmers.

[NinthSt78]

Put it on a slow boat to China where they have lots of hungry customers. If it goes over the weight limit and sinks, try building a bigger boat.

[riphamilton-2009]

this sounds more like an opinion piece than an unbiased report.

millions of americans don't believe the federal government should be subsidizing big agriculture by giving them billions in taxpayer dollars.