prev
next
Petraeus, Allen sided with Jill Kelley's sister in child custody battle
When Jill Kelley's twin sister Natalie Khawam recently needed character references to appeal the loss of custody of her four-year-old son, she turned to two prominent figures now under investigation: then-CIA director David Petraeus and the lead U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen. CBS News has obtained the letters filed in the court case bearing the signatures of the two men. They were written in late September, after Kelley had already complained to the FBI that somebody was sending her threatening emails, and about the time the FBI was conducting its first interview with Petraeus' alleged mistress: Paula Broadwell.
According to court documents, Khawam submitted both the Petraeus and Allen letters in her appeal of the scathing decision that awarded sole custody of Khawam's son to her ex-husband.
Among the reasons given by the District of Columbia Family Court judge for denying Khawam custody of her son: "profound concerns about Ms. Khawam's poor logical thinking and her extreme distortions" and "severe psychological deficits." Court documents state that Khawam "was terminated from at least four consecutive positions of employment within the first five years following her graduation from law school, is a psychologically unstable person whose unsteady moral and ethical compass and apparent lack of awareness of her own shortcomings make it impossible for her successfully to navigate her surroundings in a consistent and sustainable way."
Petraeus scandal grows: Gen. Allen now under investigation
For her part, Khawam argued that she had suffered domestic violence and other offenses. The court said the allegations were "false and unsubstantiated."
In the letters, bearing four star general flag emblems, the two generals vouch for Khawam's loving relationship with her son.
CBS News' Kim Skeen contributed to this report.Petraeus' letter, dated September 20, states that he and his wife have known Khawam for "approximately three years, getting to know her while serving in Tampa, Florida and through our friendship with Dr. and Mrs. Scott Kelley." He continued, "it is unfortunate, in my view, that her interaction with her son has been so limited by the custody settlement."
Allen's letter, dated September 22, states "It is tough enough for (the child) to live his life struggling to understand the separation of his parents. We should not penalize him by limiting his expectations to experience the love, mentorship, and guidance of his mother... I humbly request your reconsideration of the existing mandated custody settlement."
Court records indicate both Khawam and her sister Kelley have suffered financial difficulties.
Khawam filed for bankruptcy on April 14 citing liabilities of $3.6 million including $800,000 owed to her sister, $600,000 to a Tampa businessman, and $53,000 to the IRS. In another court case, Khawam is suing a former employer for alleged sexual harassment by a colleague and other charges. The employer denied all charges and accused Khawam of perjury and bankruptcy fraud.
The Kelleys and a company called "Kelley Land Holdings," were sued by Central Bank in 2010, which reportedly claimed to be owed nearly $2.2 million. A judge ordered the property in question be put up for sale.
Popular in Politics
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 528 Comments
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 118 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test 68 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate won't apologize for comments on abortion, gays
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
Rather than focus on the "crazy sister", take a look at Judge Neal E. Kravitz, an associate judge at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, and his bias against Arab-Americans demonstrated in the recent case of Khawam v Grayson P. Wolfe and that of another Arab-American male. Historically before Judge Kravitz's recent rulings against the two Arab-Americans in two separate cases, the highest attorney's fees ever ordered in family court were $20,000. In spite of such historical precedent, Judge Kravitz ordered the Arab-American male pay $250,000, and Natalie K. Khawam, an Arab-American female, $350,000 in attorney's fees. A reasonable person can only conclude that race, ethnicity, culture, and/or national origin played a primary role in the findings and determination of Judge Kravitz in these matters. Such bias and misconceived notions of an individual's national origins, ethnicity and/or race by a judge should not be permitted and such behavior is indicative of judicial misconduct.
kravitz_watch@aol.com
206-203-3196
Rather than focus on the "crazy sister", take a look at Judge Neal E. Kravitz, an associate judge at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, and his bias against Arab-Americans demonstrated in the recent case of Khawam v Grayson P. Wolfe and that of another Arab-American male. Historically before Judge Kravitz's recent rulings against the two Arab-Americans in two separate cases, the highest attorney's fees ever ordered in family court were $20,000. In spite of such historical precedent, Judge Kravitz ordered the Arab-American male pay $250,000, and Natalie K. Khawam, an Arab-American female, $350,000 in attorney's fees. A reasonable person can only conclude that race, ethnicity, culture, and/or national origin played a primary role in the findings and determination of Judge Kravitz in these matters. Such bias and misconceived notions of an individual's national origins, ethnicity and/or race by a judge should not be permitted and such behavior is indicative of judicial misconduct.
kravitz_watch@aol.com
206-203-3196
"Generals Petraeus and Allen - Helping a Domestic Violence Victim?"
http://www.voicesofmen.org/general-petraeus-and-general-allen---helping-a-domestic-violence-victim.html
Where these two men happen to actually 'get' it - domestic violence and the continuation of dv through child custody.
shame on the article,
shame on the commentors in their eagerness in to call a dv survivor 'crazy'.
The generals have access to key codes of nuclear weapons and they have this questionable behaviour. These twins must be really good to get advantage of two of the most senior people in the military - shocking indeed!
If they gave character references just because the sisters were their friends then this is criminal on their part - corruption, nepotism, favouritism, lying on Statutory Declaration, you name it. They are no more different than those who have been caged and put behind bars for nepotism. Justice must be pursued here to the full.
The only thing I like about all this is the fact the 'no one is above the law' mantra seems to be working in America, so that even hardened 4-start generals can still be called to account for their wrong behaviour.