Obama ad: Romney "dishonest" on auto bailout
Updated 4:29 p.m. Eastern Time
The Obama campaign on Monday afternoon released an ad rebutting Mitt Romney's claim - which he has stated both on the stump and in advertising - that because of the Obama administration, production of Jeeps is moving to China.
The new Obama ad, "Collapse," will air in the crucial swing state of Ohio, where one in eight jobs are tied to the auto industry. It opens by spotlighting a Romney op-ed headlined "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" to claim that Romney "turned his back" on the auto industry at a crucial time.
This is not entirely fair: Romney did not actually use that phrase - it was the headline placed on an op-ed he wrote - and Mr. Obama's administration took GM and Chrysler through a "managed bankruptcy," which is what Romney advocated in the column. The difference is that while Mr. Obama used federal funds to help the industry, Romney advocated providing federal loan guarantees to banks that loaned Detroit the necessary money. Administration officials say those loans would never have come due to the financial crisis, and that Romney's position would have thus meant the end of the industry.
The narrator in the Obama ad goes on to say that "now, after Romney's false claim of Jeep outsourcing to China, Chrysler itself has refuted Romney's lie."
On Thursday, Romney said, "I saw a story today that one of the great manufacturers in this state Jeep -- now owned by the Italians -- is thinking of moving all production to China. I will fight for every good job in America. I'm going to fight to make sure trade is fair, and if it's fair America will win."
Chrysler called that claim "a leap that would be difficult even for professional circus acrobats."
"Jeep has no intention of shifting production of its Jeep models out of North America to China," said a spokesman. "It's simply reviewing the opportunities to return Jeep output to China for the world's largest auto market. U.S. Jeep assembly lines will continue to stay in operation."
Yet the Romney campaign is continuing to suggest Jeep jobs moving overseas: In a new campaign ad, a narrator says, "Obama took GM and Chrysler into bankruptcy and sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China." This is technically true, but it's misleading: Chrysler is considering building Jeeps in China for the Chinese market, but it has not indicated it will move American Jeep jobs overseas. The company has a Jeep production facility in Toledo, Ohio.
The Obama ad goes on to say the truth is that Jeep is adding Ohio jobs before deeming Romney "wrong" on the auto bailout and "dishonest now." It shows Romney saying "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" on CBS News in 2011 in the context of a discussion of the controversial op-ed mentioned above.
UPDATE: Amanda Henneberg of the Romney campaign emailed a response to the ad.
"It appears the Obama campaign is less concerned with engaging in a meaningful conversation about President Obama's failed policies and more concerned with arguing against facts about their record they dislike," she said. "The American people will see their desperate arguments for what they are."
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 119 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 240 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen.
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 129 Comments
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Obama to tour Jersey Shore with Gov. Christie














Yeah that's it, What about the incumbent who refuses to allow off shore drilling? That way we can rely on his muslims brothers to keep us going.
LIE, Behind close doors: 47% pay no taxes and live off the Govt. Seniors, Retired, Elderly on assisted care, unemployed, students, low-wage earners including the Military, are you a leach? He doesn't expect your vote since he plans to SHAFT you.
LIE, I'll be good for everybody. "Liberal" governor to Rightie in the primaries to Centrist as candidate to Rightie reborn to Centrist in the debates to Moderate till ELECTION DAY to whoknowswhat. VOTE FOR ME SUCKERS.
LIE, nothing sinister about my tax reports and offshore accounts. Read "Mitt Romney's Bailout Bonanza" by Greg Palast investigator of corporate fraud and racketeering and journalist. His 2009 tax report will show how much he profited from the auto bailout sending autopart factories and jobs to China, paying little or no taxes.
From a Tax Justice Network study: wealthy individuals have up to $32 trillion of hidden money around the world in what are known as offshore accounts or tax havens, real estate and yachts not included. If he wants to buy the WH, Romney must show his offshore accounts and tax reports to see is he's fit for any honest job.
obwan222 says:
"Romney wanted a managed bankruptcy..."
The banks were bust. You can't have a "managed bankruptcy" without a lender or buyer and there were none available in the private market.
Instead the auto companies would have been liquidated and a million more people would be out of work as the auto supply chain collapsed.
Then you would blame the President for that.
_________________________________________
Thank you for presenting a great example of a lib partisan hack who can't do his own research and has to regurgitate lib blog drivel.
Obama's "car czar" Rattner is quoted as saying they never even approached the banks on getting $60 Billion in loans for the bailout with government backing, instead they just took taxpayer money straight to Detroit. They could have had a legitimate bankruptcy without the cost to taxpayers otherwise.
You regurgitate the BS argument laid out by the lib camp that "banks were bust", asserting there was no money. However, $75.1 billion in 2008-2009 was doled out in government backed student loans, a 25% increase over the previous year, then increased again for 2009-2010. So, no, the "banks were bust" argument doesn't wash.
Furthermore, if there were any major issues with his tax returns, you can bet the IRS would have already taken action, either on their own
--------
Yes, just like the police catch all criminals!
_______________________________________
They tend to catch the high profile ones, raffle.
Regardless, I agree that they would tend to focus on high earners. I just find the argument is that they would have caught him *no matter what*, if he had done anything illegal, to be weak.