By

Leigh Ann Caldwell /

CBS News/ October 16, 2012, 9:31 AM

Ross Perot endorses Mitt Romney

Presidential candidates Bill Clinton, Ross Perot and President George H.W. Bush shake hands with the panelists after the conclusion of their final debate, October 19, 1992, in East Lansing, Mich.

Presidential candidates Bill Clinton, Ross Perot and President George H.W. Bush shake hands with the panelists after the conclusion of their final debate, October 19, 1992, in East Lansing, Mich. / J. DAVID AKE/AFP/Getty Images

Billionaire former presidential candidate H. Ross Perot announced his support of Mitt Romney Tuesday, saying voters are faced with "a serious choice."

"We can't afford four more years in which national debt mushrooms out of control, our government grows, and our military is weakened," Perot wrote in an op-ed in the Des Moines Register.

"For the past four years, we have squandered one opportunity after the next to turn things around. The longer we delay acting, the steeper the price we will have to pay," he continued.

"As a president, [Romney] would do what this administration has been unable to do, which is reform our federal government, pare it back, and -- most critically -- keep it from acting as a brake on economic growth."

Although Romney and Perot diverge on multiple issues, including over abortion and trade, Perot backed Romney during his 2008 presidential bid as well.

Perot's two presidential bids centered around the national debt and reducing government spending. During his first presidential bid in 1992, he won 19 percent of the vote against Bill Clinton and then-President George H.W. Bush in his self-financed run as an independent. He only pulled in 8 percent in his second run in 1996.

Meantime, one of Mitt Romney's father's political aides, Walter De Vries, wrote a scathing letter to journalists, saying that Mitt Romney is not as principled as his father, George Romney. De Vries who worked for George Romney in the 1960s, while he was governor of Michigan and before his 1968 presidential run said that Mitt Romney's changing political positions are "erratic and startling."

"While it seems that Mitt would say and do anything to close a deal - or an election," he wrote, according to The New York Times, "George Romney's strength as a politician and public officeholder was his ability and determination to develop and hold consistent policy positions over his life."

He said Mitt Romney's campaign is "a far cry from the kind of campaign and conduct, as a public servant, I saw during the seven years I worked in George Romney's campaigns and served him as governor."

De Vries wrote the scathing critique of Romney in a 700-word essay, which he told The Times that it is the outline of a book.

"George would never have been seen with the likes of Sheldon Adelson or Donald Trump," De Vries added, referring to the wealthy casino mogul and the entrepreneur and reality TV show host.

De Vries said he voted for President Obama in 2008 and will again.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Leigh Ann Caldwell On Twitter »

    Leigh Ann Caldwell is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cmurphysf says:
Typical CBS - In an article that is supposed to be about Ross Perot announcing his support of Romney, you concentrate 1/2 of the article on Walter de Vries (now a liberal who does not hold the same views he did when he was George Romney's assistant) attack on Romney.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JTP711 says:
Where is the outrage on this "mans" war on women. He harbors back to the glories of the 1950's or the mormon worldview on women!!
-Men make decisions on rather women get contraceptives, no need for planned parenthood
-Gun violence is the fault of single mothers
-you want equal pay for equal work women, I tell you what you can have, you can leave early to make dinner for pappa bear
HE IS DISGUSTING and this man is sick of his attacks on my Mother, sisters, daughters, and friends!
OBAMA 2012
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Perot calls it like it is.

His predictions on NAFTA have been dead on!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
badgernation says:
#billionaire
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dougw659 says:
Just want to make sure I have this down correctly. When a billionaire who stands to make even more money from one candidate being elected endorses that candidate, I should overlook his self-interest. yeah, right.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PetrashAlan says:
Ross Perot?!?! I thought he was dead!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marklaprade says:
Hey Mr. Perot Do you still hear that sucking sound Its Bain Capital .. shutting down American companies and shipping the jobs overseas!! How bout the sucking sound of two wars on a credit card! How about the obstructionist republicans .. Heck one term president and we want him to fail comments and their blatant obstruction which I think should be along the lines of Treason.
Ross the person (s)you endorsed has change his position numerous times in just this year alone!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Protect_US_Jobs says:
I want to know where Romney really stands on "out-sourcing" and illegal immigration.



Seems in previous elections that both parties were always able to distract and polarize voters with insignificant peripheral issues, which ended up getting most of voters so caught up in the BS that they lost sight of the bigger picture.



Now that that abortion and gay marriage are not legitimate distractions, they're going with gas prices and Social Security.





If they (Both Parties) don't start addressing the real problems in our country like "out-sourcing", illegal immigration and the out of control costs of health care insurance, by the next election - American citizens may just have to run a nation-wide campaign to vote every single incumbent elected official out of office, so that maybe they'll finally get the message.



Wouldn't it be More Productive if Our Elected Leaders Started Working Together as AMERICANS for AMERICANS and AMERICA, instead of just bickering, stalling and posturing for the next election as democrats and republicans! The American People have had it with this unproductive BS! The sad thing is that both parties stink! Neither party is really looking out for the best interest of the US citizens who elect them and who they're supposed to represent.





Perot said it back in 1992 "Jobs getting sucked out of the country" - Many people saw it back then, but unfortunately too many people bought into the spin of "BS" that we were being sold.



YouTube - Giant Sucking Sound - Ross Perot 1992 Presidential Debate.flv



And this something that most of us already knew at that time, because it was just common sense!





You may want to check this site out: economyincrisis.org



economyincrisis.org/content/protectionism-matter-self-survival#comment-6632



economyincrisis.org/content/unethical-predatory-practices



Too bad we'll never see these types of articles in the mainstream media.





It's appears that the foreign interests are influencing our media as well, just watch the ABC Nightline special on Apple's iPhone and iPad products being made in China that ends with the dramatic biased comment "That you can be the nation that lines up to make these products or the nation the lines up to buy them, but it's impossible to be both". What BS propaganda! ABC has direct ties to Apple and Foxconn.



It also doesn't help us compete when these companies are subsidized by their communist government.
reply
dougw659 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are right on some issues, but are missing some bigger points. Long before there were factories in China to build electronic components, and before there was a huge pool of Asian IT talent to outsource jobs to, corporations still played the same game, just between states here in the US. They got tax breaks from state A, then wooed state B for even better tax breaks and kept moving offices and factories to wherever the labor was cheap and tax breaks were high. The people who run large corporations only understand one motive...greed. Without ongoing regulations, they will always find ways to beat the existing system. Government may have many bad features, but they are still the best counterbalance to the capital power of greedy corporations and billionaires.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zenia5 says:
OF COURSE....one billionaire endorses another billionaire...where is the news in that????

The good news is that at least some Repugs recognize Mittens for what he is....an unprincipled flip-flopper:

"Meantime, one of Mitt Romney's father's political aides, Walter De Vries, wrote a scathing letter to journalists, saying that Mitt Romney is not as principled as his father, George Romney. De Vries who worked for George Romney in the 1960s, while he was governor of Michigan and before his 1968 presidential run said that Mitt Romney's changing political positions are "erratic and startling."


"While it seems that Mitt would say and do anything to close a deal - or an election," he wrote, according to The New York Times, "George Romney's strength as a politician and public officeholder was his ability and determination to develop and hold consistent policy positions over his life."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mikesfilms says:
Perot, the one predicting a swoop of million of jobs out of the nation with NAFTA. Except it wasn't NAFTA but the outsourcing by Romney's Bain and his pals. Bain Capital, now outsourcing 170 jobs to China at Sensate Technologies and dismantling and shipping the plant to China. Consolation: some American workers will work temporarily training Chinese replacements.
reply
See all 13 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right