VP debate will again feature generational gap

Joe Biden Paul Ryan debate election vice president generic / CBSNews/Getty
For the third time in as many presidential election cycles, the vice-presidential debate on Thursday night will showcase two candidates who came of age -- both personally and politically -- in different eras.
The generational gap between 69-year-old Joe Biden and 42-year-old Paul Ryan may not be at the forefront of either campaign's debate practice sessions, but it is could have an impact on "perception battle" from the moment that the two men take the stage.
In the 2004 VP debate, the age difference between John Edwards and Dick Cheney was a relatively modest 12 years, but the physical distinctions between the youthful, energetic Democrat and the dour, white-haired Republican could hardly have been more striking.
Going into that contest in Cleveland, Edwards -- a charismatic former trial lawyer -- was widely expected to outshine the incumbent with a history of heart problems and a reputation for being proudly cantankerous.
Instead, Cheney more than held his own in a seated format that suited him well. He was able to draw attention to Edwards' status as a relative newcomer on the national political scene via a rehearsed line intended to highlight his opponent's poor Senate attendance record.
"The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight," Cheney said to Edwards in one of the debate's most memorable moments.
The assertion was later shown to be technically untrue, but during a debate in which the war in Iraq and other national security-related policies were central topics, it helped reinforce perceptions of Cheney as an experienced Washington hand, while Edwards was untested.
In what was indisputably a "change" election four years later, Sarah Palin sought to turn her relative youth into an advantage. At an Ohio rally three days before she squared off against Biden, the 44-year-old Palin drew attention to her Democratic opponent's senior status.
"I've never met him before," she said of Biden. "But I've been hearing about his Senate speeches since I was in like second grade."
Going into their face-off in St. Louis, Palin benefited from coming into the debate with the lowest expectations of any vice-presidential candidate in memory.
Her performance, in which she winked for the cameras and avoided answering many of moderator Gwen Ifill's questions directly, was largely deemed a success in light of her ability to stand toe to toe against a Washington fixture who had spent decades steeped in the intricacies of domestic and international policy.
Biden is now four years older, of course, and in Danville, Ky., on Thursday night he will be matched against an opponent two years younger than Palin was in 2008.
To put that age disparity into starker perspective, when Biden was first sworn into the U.S. Senate in 1973, Ryan was not yet 3 years old.
- no previous page
- next
Popular in Politics
- FBI: Surveillance info helped reveal subway, stock exchange bombings 204 Comments
- Jesse Jackson Jr. asks to serve jail sentence before wife
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows
- Snowden: U.S. gov't destroyed my chance for fair trial 288 Comments
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions
- IRS scandal: Is partisanship overshadowing facts? 173 Comments
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story"
- Treasury secretary's loopy signature is now less loopy















If that is who he was in the Senate......then his state must have had little to choose from!
There is a HUGE amount of information regarding this plan online in various news websites! Google is a good way to research "starve the beast"!
So what's your point, TJ?
I can just see the fear of Obama minions, buffoons and Bozos on here waiting for tomorrow night as they watch and cringe in embarrassment as Biden helps Ryan and Romney get another bounce in the polls.
LOL!
Matthew 7:15-20
Matthew 7:15-20
Privatization of SocSec will devastate those in the 80% income bracket and below at retirment age because the ONLY way they can match the benefit in a private retirement account is to average upwards of 6 to 10% year-over-year for 40 years.
Those in the upper 10% of income can easily match SocSec with only a 3% average annualized return.
Most people never take the time to understand the plans available to them.
For certain taxpayers, there is NO difference between a Roth and a Traditional IRA/401(k).
AND, depending on the state in which you work, and to which you retire, a Traditional can SAVE you beaucoup d'bucks.