CBS News/ October 9, 2012, 4:35 PM

U.S. memo warned of high risk of Libya violence

Glass, debris and overturned furniture are strewn inside a room in the gutted U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, after an attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012.

Glass, debris and overturned furniture are strewn inside a room in the gutted U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, after an attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012. / AP Photo/Ibrahim Alaguri

The regional security office for the U.S. Embassy in Libya compiled a running list of 230 security incidents through July 2012 in a memo that ultimately concluded that "the risk of U.S. Mission personnel, private U.S. citizens, or businesspersons encountering an isolating event as a result of militia or political violence is HIGH."

The document, obtained by CBS News, is the latest piece of evidence suggesting security in the country was tenuous ahead of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi that left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans dead.

Since the attack, there have been increasing questions about whether the State Department did enough to safeguard its diplomatic personnel in Libya, with some security officers for the mission claiming that repeated requests for additional security were ignored by officials in Washington.

In an email to congressional investigators dated Oct. 1, Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom said he sent similar lists of security incidents to superiors as a "significant part of (diplomatic post's) and my argument for maintaining" Diplomatic Security and Defense Department assets in Libya through October because the Libyan government "was overwhelmed and could not guarantee our protection."

"Sadly, that point was reaffirmed on Sept 11, 2012 in Benghazi," he wrote.

Nordstrom, who served in his post as regional security officer from September 2011 through July 2012, said the 230 incidents outlined in the memo "paint a clear picture that the environment in Libya was fragile at best and could degrade quickly. Certainly, not an environment Where post Should be directed to 'normalize' operations and reduce security resources in accordance with an artificial time table." In Benghazi, violent episodes appeared to be on the rise starting in June 2012 and included an explosion at the consulate June 6th, and an attack on the British Ambassador's convoy on June 11.

He wrote that an earlier version of the memo, which started tracking security incidents in June 2011, was attached to the diplomatic post's Hardship and Danger Pay report, "which resulted in an increase of danger pay to 30 [percent] of base bay" this summer.

He also claimed to have provided similar reports during regular emergency action committee meetings, though they typically focused on incidents falling within smaller time frames - two weeks or a month, he wrote.

Nordstrom is expected to testify Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Deputy Assistant Director for International Programs Charlene Lamb, who approves security requests, and Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, are also scheduled to testify.

Play Video

Ex-U.S. security team leader in Libya: "We needed more, not less" staff

Wood, in an interview with CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, said he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less. For what reasons, I don't know."

The State Department has formed a special panel to investigate the consulate attack but have told CBS News' U.S. State Department correspondent Margaret Brennan that any withdrawal of security personnel prior to the Benghazi attack had "no impact whatsoever on the total number of fully trained American security personnel in Libya overall or in Benghazi specifically." There was a Quick Reaction Force on standby in Tripoli to deploy if needed. That team did arrive in Benghazi on the night of the attack, but not until hours after the assault began.

The State Department also has continued to cite the threat assessment conducted by the Director of National Intelligence which stated that there was, "no actionable intelligence that an attack on our post in Benghazi was planned or imminent."

The Obama administration initially described the attack as an outgrowth of a protest against an anti-Muslim film produced in the U.S., which also sparked violent demonstrations outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo a day earlier.

Faced with persistent criticism from Republican lawmakers and others at the description of the attack as spontaneous, particularly given the use of heavy weaponry and organized tactics, administration officials have since classified it as a terrorist act, though Defense chief Leon Panetta said it took him "a while" to even reach that conclusion.

Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamic fundamentalist militia in Benghazi has been considered a likely suspect in the attack and is believed to have links to al Qaeda's North African branch - al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

Several other militant groups have been mentioned as possible culprits, and CBS News senior correspondent John Miller says that discerning the specific identity of those responsible will be difficult due to the blurred lines between the myriad extremist groups operating in Libya, and the wider region.

The memo noted that the rise of private militias in lawless portions of Libya threatened the fledgling national government, "which does not yet have the ability to effectively respond to and manage the rising criminal and militia related violence."

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
23 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
keithmaz says:
I suspect the reason Obama was "off" in the debate was largely due to his recent revelation that his Libya cover up was unraveling.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Martha12345 says:
Where is Hillary hiding ?
reply
takacrat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In the back of the bus where Obama throed her.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
infantryman1968 says:
U.S. memo warned of high risk of Libya violence
LOL!
You have to believe that there is an enemy in order to defend against it. Obama and his followers pathologically believe that the war on terrorism was strictly between Bush and the terrorists and not the American people.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
randysanders says:
As far as I know, the Defense Department is in charge of security for US Embassies and Consulates. After Libya's own people helped rid their country of Khadafi, it was important to either let their own people decide who'd lead their country or infuse their government with US operatives to insure that Libya became a safe country. The US Embassy and Consulate should have been aware of all possibilities of attacks. The intelligence reports from this attack seem to have conflicting data. One says that the anti islamic film made in America may have had some influence. The other says it was a preplanned attack suggesting it comemorated the attack of 9-11. It is possible that either is true and it is possible that both are tru to some degree. What ramlifications will it have? At present it seems that the defense department and intelligence communities have let Obama down. Is it possible that certain members in the defense department and inteligence communities hope that Romney seizes on this vulnerability to suggest Obama isn't informed enough on the issues of the day. My bet is that republicans in the defense department and republicans in some intelligence communities have a vendetta to rid the country of a democratic president by any means necessary.
reply
takacrat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama now has the same problems that Bush had. Obama explain how that this is still happening!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erick_z says:
This is truly sad.. The current administration appears to be completely out of touch and negligent.
reply
takacrat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's Bush Falt!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lovingcare says:
@ Cubscout09 & Newster90210

Mohammed al-Magarief, the president of Libya's General Assembly said on Wednesday that the deadly September 11 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was a pre-planned assault that had "nothing to do with" an anti-Islam online video.

Magarief said there were no protesters at the site before the attack, which he noted came in two assaults, first with rocket-propelled grenades on the consulate, then with mortars at a safe house.
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Was he there? No. Did he give any papers to support that? No.

I'm betting that he is saying that there were 'no protesters' because a riot-induced killing looks worse than a terrorist-induced killing in a foreign nation.

In the latter, it could be people coming from outside of the country. In the former, it is mostly people IN the country and leans to showing the political climate in that country.
takacrat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Was you there, NO was you in Vegas with Obama NO, he didn't invite you!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sooner_schooner says:
I can't believe Obama's media is actually reporting this. Like rats fleeing a sinking ship, I suppose.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bluejacket2-2009 says:
A tip., when Romney tilts his head with a cute smile he is lying... He does that tilt and smerk daily... he stutters and rambles thinking of stuff that sounds good....

He will cut your deductions!!!! to pay the tax cut for the rich!
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
He's not trolling, he is telling the truth about Romney, or as some are calling him: Rob-Me.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
keithmaz says:
CBS war correspondent Lara Logan

Speaking to a crowd of about 1,100 at last Tuesday's Better Government Association annual luncheon, Logan accused the administration of downplaying the number of Al Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan to support its rush to leave. She also claimed Washington acts as apologists for the Taliban by downplaying their links to Al Qaeda and the strength of their organization.

"I chose this subject because, one, I can't stand that there is a major lie being propagated," Logan said. That lie, she explained, is that the American military has weakened the Taliban.

Even the progressive biased media is finally beginning to do their job and actually report on REAL issues. Keep moving center CBS, don't continue to betray the American people as well as your own profession.
The Obama administration is not only incompetent but also corrupt top to bottom.
reply
bluejacket2-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
George Bush and Mitt Romney are the Republican party.... Bush, Bush, Bush... get used to that name because that is what you get with Mitt Romney and America is going to get an earful in the coming weeks...

Romney will start war everywhere, the deaths in Lybia as tragic as they were are nothing compared to those killed under Bush and Romney if elected.
keithmaz replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bluejacket. You prove my point precisely. It is clear from your delusional comment that you are a progressive lemming incapable of independent thought, unable to utter anything other than what the liberal media feeds to you. You are a good example of the the damage the main stream media is doing.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
VeggieVal says:
Well, at least now we know why the big cover-up by the Administration.

The compound was below minimal security standards, the Ambassador's team repeatedly requested additional security measures, and they were ignored.

No wonder Obama would cling to his lies...even more amazing is that I'm certain there will be several in here leaping to the President's defense, and no doubt some will even try to blame Romney, the Republican House or some other Conservative target.

Haven't we had enough of this incompetence yet?
reply
tverney replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A big cover up? What planet are you from? Iran-Contra, that was a big coverup (Reagan). Watergate, that was a big coverup (Nixon). Weapons of mass destruction (Bush), that was just the village idiot at the helm.

What ambassador is going to ever say security is good, just send the team home? Obviously, you haven't eaten your veggies today!
See all 23 Comments