NRA releases anti-Obama ad
After endorsing Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney last week, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is out with an anti-Obama television ad, the latest signal that the powerful pro-gun organization is preparing to commit significant resources in the effort to help defeat the president's re-election this fall.
The ad, which does not mention Romney by name, attacks unnamed, presumably Democratic, parties for "chipping away at" rights and freedoms - including Second Amendment rights.
"Mountains of debt. Threats to our sovereignty. Chipping away at your rights. Chipping away at your freedom," a narrator in the ad says. "And now they're attacking your Second Amendment rights."
"But you can stop them," the ad says, as "Stop Obama" text flashes across the screen. "Right now. Defend freedom. Defeat Obama."
According to an NRA spokesperson, the ad will air through Election Day in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and Wisconsin. The buy for this week was $1.5 million.
The NRA's Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox formally endorsed Romney for president last week at a campaign stop in Fishersville, Va., nearly six months after Romney spoke at the NRA in an appeal for the powerful lobby's support.
Romney has in the past backed an assault weapons ban and a waiting period to buy firearms, but he has signaled more recently that he would not support any new gun laws.
Gun control advocates argue that, contrary to what the NRA suggests in its ad, Mr. Obama has not done enough to promote gun control. In 2010, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence gave the president a failing grade for "continuing concessions to the 'guns anywhere' mentality of the gun lobby and lack of leadership for common-sense gun laws."
Among the laws Mr. Obama has signed while president is one that allows people to carry concealed weapons in national parks and in checked luggage on Amtrak trains. The Brady campaign also complained in 2010 that Mr. Obama "muzzled Cabinet members who expressed any support for stronger gun laws and failed to appoint permanent leadership at the agency that polices the gun industry," and that "this White House even voiced no objection to people carrying guns near Presidential events."
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 114 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 141 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 126 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen.
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- Obama to tour Jersey Shore with Gov. Christie














I own a motor vehicle. I must register that motor vehicle. I must pass a test for a drivers' license. If I want to drive a truck, I must get another type of license and pass another type of drivers' test.
What is wrong with requiring gun owners to conform to the same licensing procedures?
Incidentally, if you are wondering where the Mexican Mafia gets its weapons, at least 90% of them come from NRA gun shows. Incidentally, Fast and Furious was really an attempt to figure out how drug dealers got guns. It did not involve DOJ agents buying guns and giving them to drug dealers.
The gun laws, particularly in Arizona, prevented the Justice Department from any further action.
That which can be regulated/licensed can be prohibited. Might as will license the possession of a printing press, computer, pen and paper; they are all mightier than the sword and have killed more people.
Says a lot when you feel more threatened by a bunch of moral, salt of the earth types than you do a pathological liar and Marxist intent on bankrupting your country, don't you think?
We don't believe you even have a husband, there is no way you would be married to a law abiding gun owner with those views.
"Methinks the NRA doth protest too strongly"?
Where did you go to school? Sounds like ghetto talk to me, no wonder you don't want us to have guns, you want them all for you and your thugs!
If we really want to honor the 2nd ammendment then gun ownership MUST be well regulated. We do not currently have a well regulated system.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/14/national-rifle-association/barack-obama-coming-after-guns-under-radar-nra-say/