Romney's tax suggestion gives more clarity, but details still sparse
Mitt Romney this week offered some more insight into his tax reform plan, but not enough to fully understand how his agenda may impact voters' payments to the IRS or the federal deficit.
In an interview with Denver TV station KDVR on Monday, Romney suggested capping federal income tax deductions at $17,000. "And you could use your charitable deduction, your home mortgage deduction, or others -- your health care deduction, and you can fill that bucket, if you will, that $17,000 bucket that way," he said. "And higher income people might have a lower number."
The idea was merely a suggestion and doesn't represent a formal policy proposal from the Republican candidate. It does, however, give some insight into how Romney might pay for the revenue losses that would come from his proposed tax cuts -- which could reach as high as $456 billion in 2015 if current policies are kept in place.
"It is at least a down payment on the revenue lost to the rate cuts," Robertson Williams, an analyst at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, told CBSNews.com.
Still, there are some major unknowns: For instance, to determine how large that down payment would be, Romney would have to give some more specifics, such as whether that $17,000 cap applies to individuals or couples.
In tonight's debate, President Obama is sure to drive home the fact that Romney's tax reform plan has so far been short on details. Romney has promised to cut income tax rates by 20 percent across the board, repeal the estate tax, and get rid of taxes in investment income for those making up to $200,000. While he has said the tax cuts would be offset in part by eliminating deductions and loopholes, he has not clarified what deductions and loopholes he would eliminate.
In email to supporters Wednesday, Obama deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter wrote, "We'll see if Mitt Romney finds some time in tonight's 90-minute debate to tell us specifically how he can avoid raising taxes on middle-class families and still pay for another $250,000 tax cut for multimillionaires."
- no previous page
- next
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 170 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Obama: Racism is no excuse for not excelling Play Video
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 107 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 363 Comments
- Obama to discuss legality of drone program














In addition, dividend income is taxed at a lower rate than a paycheck. Executives are asking for lower salary and higher dividend payments. They use the lower salary to fool the workers into thinking they are taking a pay cut for the good of the company. They are actually making a killing on a 14% tax rate while workers are at 25 - 35%. Recently a big bank CEO said he would take just one dollar in pay until the company got out of trouble. He forgot to mention he was accepting several million shares in company stock in leu of salary. Bank shares were $2.20 at the time now they are $9.50. That exec. made a cool $19 million and the gains tax will be half of what he would have paid if it were income.
The little guy gets screwed again under the Romney plan.
I opened up our 2011 tax return and calculated it based on 17k in deductions. I left in the deduction per person, as I sure hope Romney is not talking about taking that also.
Our initial federal tax goes up by 2,950.00, and you can bet that reduction in Social security tax is toast, so add on another 2% of your GROSS income for that tax.
I must tell you we ARE taxpayers, not wealthy, and have a fairly large mortgage, but that is not all that is at stake with the 17k limit.
The 17K proposed is the TOTAL of all mortgage interest, points, property tax, sales tax deduction, other taxes, Charity deductions (tithes, etc.), Medical and Dental expenses (that include insurance) over 7.5%, job expenses, etc.
The child tax credit will most certainly disappear. That is subtracted off the tax you owe, bottom line, so each child credit you get now, is 1000.00 less in your pocket.
This is not political, this IS reality.
Do the math and see what your vote MAY cost you personally.
Or
They may cap deductions at 17K for our returns.
What is your home mortgage interest deduction worth to you?
Not to mention many people buy a home BECAUSE of that deduction. This will effect home sales, construction, and numerous areas.
If you file long form, check your itemized deductions and see what you could lose.
How many children do you get 1000.00 child tax credit for? Lose that, and it is 1000.00 per child, out of your pocket.
I will leave it at that.
Here's the 60 minutes link
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7422772n
The President was frustrated at the inability to get real answers from Mr. Romney.
I thought he remained cool while Romney was bordering on losing it.
It was just an idea. One of many his campaign floats out there then strike down later, off camera, by someone else in the campaign.
He throws vague ideas out there to see if it sticks or not because he doesn't have a plan.
The only thing it shows clearly is that Mitt is a BS artist that only knows how to say "it's all Obama's fault". That's it. That's what he does. I can't believe he's even running for President.