CBS/AP/ October 2, 2012, 9:24 PM

GOP says White House ignored Libya warnings

WASHINGTON Despite two explosions and dozens of other security threats, U.S. officials in Washington turned down repeated pleas from American diplomats in Libya to increase security at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi where the U.S. ambassador was killed, Republican leaders of a House committee said Tuesday.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chairman Darrell Issa and Rep. Jason Chaffetz of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee said their information came from "individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya."

Issa, R-Calif., and Chaffetz, R-Utah, said the attack three weeks ago in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months before the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the U.S.

There was allegedly even a direct threat on Facebook, the Daily Beast reports. In June, militants associated with the late dictator Muammar Qaddafi allegedly posted a threat referencing Amassador Stevens' jogging route, even posting a picture of him.

Intense questioning over the White House's handling of the situation in Libya has gained a lot of traction in Republican circles recently, perhaps as a late election-season broadside.

On Sunday on "Face the Nation", former House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested the ambassador was without security on 9/11, and that was a terrible mistake. (There was a small security detail in Benghazi during the attack. It was overrun.)

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said recently the handling of the situation was "unbelievable." GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan called the incident "part of a bigger story of the unraveling of (the Obama administration's) agenda all over the world."

In the most recent push back against the Obama administration's actions in Libya, the House committee's letter listed 13 incidents in all that should have given the White House concern, but Chaffetz said in an interview there were more than 50. Two of them involved explosive devices: a June 6 blast that blew a hole in the security perimeter. The explosion was described to the committee as "big enough for 40 men to go through"; and an April 6 incident where two Libyans who were fired by a security contactor threw a small explosive device over the consulate fence.

"A number of people felt helpless in pushing back" against the decision not to increase security and "were pleading with them to reconsider," Chaffetz said. He added that frustrated whistle-blowers were so upset with the decision that they were anxious to speak with the committee.

The lawmakers said they plan a hearing on Oct. 10. They asked Clinton whether the State Department was aware of the previous incidents, and whether the level of security that was provided to the U.S. mission met the security threat, and how the department responded to requests for more protection.

The State Department has declined to answer questions about whether extra security was sought by officials in Benghazi ahead of the attack.

Clinton responded in a letter to Issa on Tuesday that she has established an accountability review board that will determine "whether our security systems and procedures in Benghazi were adequate, whether those systems and procedures were properly implemented, and any lessons learned that may be relevant to our work around the world."

She asked the committee to withhold any final conclusions about the Benghazi attack until the committee can review the findings of the board. The panel is led by retired State Department official Thomas Pickering and includes retired Adm. Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Clinton also pledged to address the specific questions raised in the committee's letter in addition to document requests.

Referring to the Benghazi attack, the letter said, "It was clearly never, as administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest."

In the days immediately after the attack, the Obama administration said it believed it was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video circulating on the Internet. Since then, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and White House press secretary Jay Carney have called the incident a terrorist attack. President Barack Obama has not used those precise words, though he has referred to the attack in the context of "acts of terror."

U.S. and Libyan investigators still aren't working together three weeks after the attack. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Tuesday the U.S. wants maximum transparency, collaboration and cooperation. She said the U.S. and Libya were partnering well politically, but there now has to be cooperation at the investigative level.

Clinton discussed security on Sept. 18, when asked whether measures were appropriate.

"Let me assure you that our security in Benghazi included a unit of host government security forces, as well as a local guard force of the kind that we rely on in many places around the world," she said.

"In addition to the security outside the compound, we relied on a wall and a robust security presence inside the compound," she said. "And with all of our missions overseas, in advance of Sept. 11, as is done every year, we did an evaluation on threat streams."

Clinton also said the Office of the Director of National Intelligence "has said we had no actionable intelligence that an attack on our post in Benghazi was planned or imminent."

She added that diplomats "engage in dangerous work, and it's the nature of diplomacy in fragile societies and conflict zones to be aware of the necessity for security but to also continue the important diplomatic work that has to go on.

"There is risk inherent in what we do and what these brave men and women representing the United States are up against every single day," Clinton said, "and we do our very best to limit that risk by ensuring that our security protocols reflect the environments in which diplomats work and the threats that they are presented with."

Chaffetz said in an interview that if the Benghazi security was typical of the protection in other dangerous places, "that's frightening." He said Benghazi is "one of the most awful and volatile areas on the planet. A reduction in the security profile doesn't seem consistent with the threat that was on the ground. That's why we have whistleblowers anxious to speak with us."

Among the incidents cited in the Issa-Chaffetz letter to Clinton:

- Just weeks before the attacks, the unarmed Libyan guards at the consulate, employed by British contractor Blue Mountain Group, were warned by family members to quit their jobs because there were rumors of an impending attack.

- In April, a gun battle erupted about two miles from the consulate between an unidentified armed group and forces loyal to the transitional government.

- In June, a posting on a Facebook page mentioned Stevens' early morning runs around Tripoli along with members of his security detail. The page contained a threat against Stevens and a stock photo of him. Stevens stopped the runs for about a week, but then resumed.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
124 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimhass says:
It's pretty clear that Fox News has its eye on another phony scandal, and for some reason, CBS, which used to have standards, feels compelled to go along. And the commenters show all the characteristics of the Fox herds: all repeating the same nonsense they've heard.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MamaMia325 says:
This is the fourth most talked about article today, but it was moved from your front page into politics? It's a shame this is election season, because I truly believe that if this security failure on our part happened at a different time, this would be investigated as a nonpartisan issue, with interest by both sides. Politics is an ugly business, and I'm starting to firmly believe you can't expect to get a straight shake from our news at all anymore. Very sad that the lives lost are getting thrown under the bus in the name of politics.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mick_from_Amsterdam says:
It is to be hoped that both debate participants have agreed to be patted down prior to the debate...

We wouldn't want a repeat of the George W Bush "badly tailored shirt that looked like it covered a battery pack" affair of 2000

And lately...Mitt hasn't been looking nd actin even more not-too-bright thn Bush did back then...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
walkthetalk says:
Are you kidding me! the White House doesn't make mistakes, according to his spoon-fed followers.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fittinguy says:
Mr Issa is this going to be another year long "investigation" like your attack on AG Eric Holder? There is no smoke, there is no fire, just a corrupt House Committee Chairman.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ongelooflijk-2009 says:
Based on many of the front page stories the major news outlets have chosen to run with, it looks like the media want to make this as competitive a presidential race as possible. You know, work the American voting public up into 'a proper frenzy' with the polls, well timed stories and what not!

Don't you just love the ratings race---------Not to mention the part about being manipulated, NOT!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
And Bush ignored 9/11 warnings, lied about Saddam...

What if both sides lie for the benefit of partisan followers?
reply
PNMMM replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ENOUGH ABOUT BUSH!!!!! the guy sucked.... he's gone... get over it.. now what about our current loser in the White House. you going to elect him again America?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
USSAmerikan says:
After reading excerpts from Ambassador Stvens' diary and how he clearly knew he was targeted and begged his bosses for SOME protection one would have to reach the conclusion that either Hawaiian born Barry Soetoro, nationalized Indonesian and adoptive son of Indonesian Muslim Lolo Soetoro, blood son of Marxist Muslim Barack Hussein Obama is the epitome of incompetence, leaving our ambassador to die a horrible death on the anniversary of 9-11, in Libya of all places, suffocated and having his cadaver dessecrated OR he was simply giving his Muslim correligionates their pound of flesh for having killed Obama Bin laden, turning Ambassador Stevens into a peace offering at the altar of Extremist Islam. We'll find out in a few years when someone who was involved is on his/her deathbead wants to make their peace with the Lord.
reply
boba2222 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Another Tea Baggin Birther Nut, cuckoo for coco puffs@!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
john92021 says:
time for Hillary to fall on her sword or at least give up her security for the embassies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
usunus says:
The fact is the NATO leaders totally ignored the warnings of Gaddafi about the Libyan extremists.The leaders rushed into Bengazi impetuously under the war cry of Hillary Clinton falsely claiming an imminent humanitarian disaster in Bengazi.The four Americans killed in the consulate attack consequently paid a heavy price for this terrible folly.And history is going to repeat itself in Syria,if we are not more cautious.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not disagreed...
See all 124 Comments