AP/ July 16, 2012, 7:00 PM

GOP blocks campaign donor disclosure bill

WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans have blocked Democratic-backed legislation requiring organizations pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into campaign ads to disclose their top donors and the amounts they spend.

GOP opposition prevented Democrats from getting the 60 votes needed to bring what is known as the Disclose Act to the Senate floor. The vote was 51-44.

Democrats revived the act during a presidential election campaign in which political action committees and nonprofit organizations, funded by deep-pocketed and largely anonymous contributors, are dominating the airwaves with largely negative political ads.

Another version of the Disclose Act passed the then-Democratic-controlled House in 2010 but was similarly blocked by Republicans in the Senate. Republicans cite First Amendment rights and say the bill favors unions in opposing the legislation.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky accused Democrats of wasting time on bills "they know won't pass but which give them a chance to make a fuss about a problem that doesn't exist and blow a kiss to the unions for good measure."

The bill, which would not have gone into effect until next January, would have required any organization that spends $10,000 or more during an election cycle to file a report within 24 hours identifying any donors who gave $10,000 or more. Current election law requires super political action committees, or PACS, to make periodic reports to the Federal Election Commission, but nonprofit groups, including social welfare organizations, labor unions and trade groups, generally do not have to reveal the sources of election-related spending.

"Perhaps Republicans want to shield the handful of billionaires willing to contribute nine figures to sway a close presidential election," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. He said this election was in danger of being bought by "17 angry, old, white men."

The White House, in a statement, said the bill was needed so Americans would "know who is attempting to influence the nation's elections." Without the bill, it said, "corporations and wealthy individuals will continue to be able to shield their donations from disclosure."

Democrats have been pushing for more disclosure since the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in the 2010 Citizens United case that overturned a decades-old law barring corporations, unions and other organizations from spending on advertising and other forms of political activity.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said super PACS and other outside groups have spent some $150 million during this election cycle, double the amount spent during the same period in 2008. Election campaigns, he said, are "now waged by shadowy political attack groups posing as social welfare organizations."

The Sunlight Foundation watchdog group said Monday that Crossroads GPS, a conservative organization formed by Republican strategist Karl Rove, has announced ad buys so far totaling $83 million while Americans for Prosperity, another conservative group founded by brothers Charles and David Koch, have bought ads worth $32 billion.

Groups such as Crossroads GPS, are classified as social welfare organizations not subject to disclosure laws as long as they spend more than half their resources toward "social welfare" purposes. But that 50 percent can go for "public education" that can be highly political in nature.

Knowing they were facing defeat, Democratic supporters announced earlier in the day that they would hold a "midnight vigil," speeches going late into the evening on the need for greater campaign transparency. "We can't let the special interests off the hook after just one round," Whitehouse said.

Monday's vote was strictly along party lines except for Reid, who changed his vote to "no" in a procedural move that allows him to bring up the legislation again on Tuesday.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
23 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
digitalartlady says:
The Republicans are literally putting a gun to the Supreme Court, The Senate, The Congress and telling them "We don't have to disclose nothing and we the GOP have successfully block you from knowing who is funding us". If Americans roll over on this one then what's the point of voting?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
GOP blocks campaign donor disclosure bill
---
And repubs rail that Obama's administration is not "transparent" enough.....

Anyone who doubts that the repubs are dedicated to the top 2% is totally blind.
reply
hillzhavays replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The bill's intent is to allow a political party to go after its enemies. There is no need to see what or how much a company has donated.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UForgotPoland says:
Where's the Republican "Straight Talk Express"?
reply
Former_Marine_Sgt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As always the 'straight talk' only applies when it's used against anyone daring to NOT be of the faith (Right wing Republicanism).

The first tenent of the faith (Right wing Republicanism) is 'to be two faced against those who are not of the faith IS upholding the faith'
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lami987 says:
GOP contributors are a bunch of job outsourcers, tax evaders and have accounts in tax havens like swiss banks, Caymen Islands and Bermuda.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
proofistruth says:
Could this be the year Americans get so sick of the hate ads, the Repugnant strategy backfires?

Think of the millions spent, to buy a fake TV news channel, set up the talking point focus groups, hire the hate radio poisinalities, wouldn't it be easier if the Repugs could ever just have an idea?
reply
parrot2-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Chevy, even repugs are trying to find out what Mitt plans to do ..... Dumb Dumb repugs !!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tryingtodogoodwork says:
It's inconceivable to me that anyone of conscience, of plain simple decency, could ever again vote Republican.

President Obama, 2012!

Democrat super-majority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
Just ask yourself one simple little question...what is it Republicans fear about disclosing who their donors are ?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
reality_sanity says:
Only those up to no good seek to hide their "honest" actions.
reply
demkicker123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Like obama did?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nearl451 says:
I guess they've done this in the spirit of full disclosure?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
76SpiritOf says:
Well, this goes to show who we sould be voting for.

Straight democratic ticket this time. Anyone who feels that large donors should be identified should vote the same way!

Let's show the Koch Brothers they cannot buy the ballot box!
reply
tryingtodogoodwork replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You're spot on, 76. I can't imagine ever voting anything other than straight-ticket Democrat again. And I'll encourage every person I know to do the same.
demkicker123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It will never happen. All who voted for obamacare in the full congress is at risk. You'll see.
See all 23 Comments